HighCaliber
1.1K posts
$BTQ CEO buying up 100,000 shares.
@BTQ_Tech @olivierfrancois
More insider purchases, more confidence in the stock, regardless of share price movement.
Let me ask you this, is this a sign of a failing company or an undervalued company?
Trust the process.
💰🔜📈🚀
English
HighCaliber retweetledi
Okay guys, here’s the game plan $BTQ
🚨🚨🚨🚨
(I know this is a long tweet, but stick with me)
I’ve sat here all day, pondering how to make this company better. At least in terms of stock price—as financials, accounting and delivery of such—are the only things I’m certified to speak on.
⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
Why We’re Missing the Mark:
Accounting + Marketing ($BTQ)
This problem isn’t just marketing.
And it’s not just accounting either.
It’s the disconnect between the two—and that disconnect is directly affecting the stock price.
At first, I thought this fell entirely on marketing.
The job of marketing is simple: bring in customers.
The current strategy is to sit back and wait on government mandates. Which I understand has been the strategy for a while and updated as of the latest earnings call.
BUT,
That’s a mistake.
Governments move slowly. Mandates take time. And new customers—under the current plan—won’t arrive fast enough to stabilize or support the stock price. Not because demand doesn’t exist, but because customers are waiting on technology to be fully built and deployed.
That part is fine. Engineers should build. That’s their job.
But that doesn’t mean sales and marketing have to WAIT for technology —that’s never existed before—-to exist.
So,
Where this truly breaks down is accounting.
Where Accounting Is Failing:
The accounting team is not properly leveraging the power of ASC 606, which is fully GAAP-compliant and exactly how the big players operate—
( $PLTR, $NVDA, $TSMC, just to name a few).
Under ASC 606, we can and should be recognizing revenue tied to committed customers and contractual expectations, even if the technology isn’t fully deployed yet. This allows the company to:
1. Book earnings appropriately
2. Show legitimate accounts receivable
3. Reflect real demand and future cash flow
4. Present financial health, momentum, and growth in real time
This is how early-stage and high-growth companies protect themselves from the exact problem $BTQ is facing now: a failing stock price while technology is still being built.
These tools exist for a reason.
Why This Matters for Stock Price:
Stock price is not driven by hope.
It’s driven by accounting optics, revenue visibility, and confidence.
ASC 606 also allows for later write-offs of unperformed obligations. Any revenue tied to work that ultimately isn’t completed can be deferred or written off against future revenues. That flexibility:
1. Reduces capital risk
2. Protects against funding shortfalls
3. Removes the fear of overextension
This is standard practice. It’s legal. It’s within GAAP. And it’s how the “big fish” play the game.
Not using these tools is choosing to play at a disadvantage.
The Fix Is Simple (and Proven)
This isn’t about forcing results—it’s about letting the right people do the right jobs:
1. Stock Price = Accounting
2. Customers = Marketing
3. Technology = Engineers
4. Execution & Compliance = Legal
Let engineers build.
Let accountants structure the numbers correctly.
Let lawyers ensure everything is applied properly.
Use all the tools in the shed.
High-level execution of both marketing and accounting, working together—not in silos—can stabilize and ultimately save this stock price before full deployment.
If this approach doesn’t work, I’ll gladly admit defeat.
But history shows that everyone who’s used these principles has succeeded.
It’s time we fall in line.
Here’s to better outcomes ❤️🤝🚀
@BTQ_Tech @olivierfrancois @CSchlauf @blip_tm @en_tropyc
God bless you all, be great. 🙏
GIF
English
HighCaliber retweetledi
When life gets you down and you feel unloved and worthless, just remember you’ll be dead one day.
Have a great weekend.
English