spy
663 posts


@ultimate_kombo You think we don’t know what fifa is planning. Dey play game wey dem don know who go win am
English

@Beyondthematchh No mind them. Agenda go flow if dem know win this match
English

Zlatan Ibrahimovic on Chelsea's £117m deal for Morgan Rogers:
🗣 “Not every player with one good season is worth £100m. I wonder how much Lamine Yamal, Vinicius and Michael Olise will be worth if Rogers is £117m.”

Kalshi Sports@KalshiSports
NEW: A Kalshi user has put $291,995 on Lamine Yamal to NOT score today vs Argentina. Potential payout of $400,000.
English

@ENZOIZU This is not analysis anymore. It is negativity dressed up as insight. Chelsea could win the league and you would still frame it as proof the project is failing. Not a single positive post, ever. This one is complete nonsense. You are just farming engagement through negativity.
English

🎙️Chelsea fans, £117m on Morgan Rogers doesn’t prove the project is real.
It proves the project is exactly what we’ve been saying it is.
This club just agreed to pay Aston Villa £117m for a 23-year-old attacker. Xabi Alonso was instrumental. 6+1 year deal. Medical Monday. Big signing. Big noise. Same story.
Meanwhile:
Andrey Santos was developed here, raised his value, and was sold to Manchester United for £50m before he could become important.
Marc Cucurella became one of the few reliable senior voices and left for Real Madrid.
Malo Gusto is being linked away.
Trevoh Chalobah has attracted interest.
Enzo Fernández’s future is still a conversation, even after Alonso said he wants to keep him.
The Xhaka pursuit got rejected by Sunderland.
No European football next season.
But yes, tell me again how dropping £117m on another young, high-ceiling forward answers the actual questions.
This isn’t building. This is the same pattern dressed up as progress.
You develop the young ones just enough to make them sellable.
You spend big on the exciting attacking profiles that create headlines and “big club” noise.
You let the experienced voices and the spine become discussions.
You call it vision. You call it a new era. You repeat.
Alonso knew this model before he signed. He knew the churn. He knew the lack of permanence. He knew the sporting directors were running the same recruitment philosophy. He signed anyway. Now he’s the credible face putting his name on the £117m attacking signing while the questions about who actually stays and who the team is built around remain unanswered.
Morgan Rogers might be excellent. He might develop into exactly the player they hope he becomes. That’s not the point.
The point is that a club that has spent over a billion pounds in four years and finished 10th doesn’t get to silence every criticism with another expensive forward before it explains what the spine looks like on September 1st if Enzo goes, if Gusto follows, and if the left-back and holding midfield situations aren’t resolved.
Spending money was never the argument.
Treating almost everyone as eventually discussable while dropping £117m on the next shiny attacker is.
That’s not a project.
That’s just better marketing on the same model.
#CFC



English

£117m for an average player like Rogers? Never really rated him and I honestly don’t think Arsenal need him anyways. We need a player who can create space in difficult situations.
David Ornstein@David_Ornstein
🚨 EXCLUSIVE: Chelsea reach verbal agreement with Aston Villa to sign Morgan Rogers. Bid of £117m accepted by #AVFC & being finalised. 6+1y contract, medical Monday. #AFC interested but 23yo attacker wanted #CFC; Xabi Alonso instrumental @TheAthleticFC nytimes.com/athletic/63902…
English









