Seb Stern

2.2K posts

Seb Stern banner
Seb Stern

Seb Stern

@sseb85

Poker player. Financial analyst. Student of life.

Toronto, Ontario Katılım Ağustos 2021
432 Takip Edilen913 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Seb Stern
Seb Stern@sseb85·
This Canada-wide Rogers outage really highlights the dangers of monopolized industries. When one malfunction can put half of a country’s economy on pause, we have a big problem.
English
286
4.2K
18.7K
0
Seb Stern retweetledi
Ajay Joe
Ajay Joe@joedelhi·
“In this video, I want to share a touching story that took place in Almaty. In 2016, a dog fell into the Sayran reservoir and couldn’t get out because of the smooth banks. A young man tried to rescue it but couldn’t do it alone. That’s when a group of people formed a human chain, holding hands, and together they rescued both the dog and the young man. Now, 10 years later, that act of solidarity has been turned into a sculpture inaugurated in March 2026. This monument not only immortalizes the rescue of a little dog, but also shows how art can serve as a bridge between emotion and action. Through a small being, this human chain reminded us that when we come together, we can overcome barriers, save lives, and, as a society, build a more compassionate and united future.” Via instagram.com/reel/DWM0YsMka… #almaty #RescueStory #Solidarity #HumanChain
English
56
832
3.8K
63.2K
Seb Stern
Seb Stern@sseb85·
@michelletandler Meanwhile the “liberal progressives” remain (predictably) silent.
English
0
0
6
117
Michelle Tandler
Michelle Tandler@michelletandler·
I don't even know which I am angrier about - NYC's first lady using slurs against Gays and Black people, or her celebrating the bombing of Jews.
English
25
35
291
6.1K
Seb Stern
Seb Stern@sseb85·
@BretWeinstein @davidicke While I did appreciate the honest arc of your Covid beliefs, this “first hour” response is not honest. In the first few episodes of Dark Horse you were openly claiming and advocating removing all clothes entering the house, straight into the laundry, shower, full sanitizing, etc.
English
0
0
1
158
Bret Weinstein
Bret Weinstein@BretWeinstein·
@davidicke Listen David, no one owes anyone an apology for trying to do the right thing, especially with respect to voting. Your claim that I bought the "Covid hoax in its entirety" is nasty, and wrong. My belief began to break in the first hour. Look it up.
English
142
46
2.6K
79.4K
David Icke
David Icke@davidicke·
Oh yes you do. You are the same guy who bought the 'Covid' hoax in its entirety and yet claim 'influencer credibility' for being utterly wrong over and over. No wonder Rogan and Carlson give you a platform. Have you ever wondered, 'intellectual giant', that maybe politics is not the answer, but a trap? Have you ever realised that the lesser of two evils is still evil or that even the 'lesser' often turns out to be worst option? I left school at 15 without taking any exams and could see what Trump was in 2016. You are one of the 'intellectual class' and could not. Says so much about the 'education' (programming) system. Voting for Trump was a 'patriotic duty'? What utter bollocks. Better have him on again, Joe and Tucker, to tell your audience what to believe. He's never wrong.
Bret Weinstein@BretWeinstein

I don’t owe anyone an apology for supporting Trump. No one does. The Democrats didn’t run a credible candidate. They ran two insults to our intelligence. It was a de facto coup—rule by a cabal of advisors. Voting Trump was a patriotic duty even if a cabal now seems to control him

English
273
133
1.2K
254.9K
Seb Stern
Seb Stern@sseb85·
@hungryhorsepokr You don’t think you need strong mental game because you have it. If you didn’t have it, you’d need it.
English
0
0
4
258
hungryhorsepoker
hungryhorsepoker@hungryhorsepokr·
my most controversial poker opinion: "mental game" is a shiny object feels good to work on. is probably the 9th most important thing. dialing in a repeatable thought process, getting fast at ranging, thinking 3 steps ahead...that's what actually moves the needle. not journaling about how your last bad session made you feel. look, not saying mental game isn't important in other aspects of life. i went to therapy for years and it completely changed the trajectory of my life. when it comes to poker, though? feels great. doesn't address the real issue.
Terrance Reid@tjreidpoker

@hungryhorsepokr You don't need mental game is crazy talk

English
28
1
70
61.8K
Seb Stern
Seb Stern@sseb85·
@LodgePokerATX In Toronto, at “Canada’s largest casino” we pay roughly $50-$60/hr in rake - 10% to $20 at any stake. $12/hr is mind blowing
English
1
0
1
70
Lodge Card Club Austin
Lodge Card Club Austin@LodgePokerATX·
$1 Comps Are Back!!! From now on, players will earn $1/hour comps for all cash game play! Players will be able to check their balances on Poker Atlas and redeem them at our kiosks. In addition to this, we are moving to a new hybrid pricing model for cash games: For players who pre-pay time, the rate will remain at $12/hour. Post-pay will now be $13/hour.
English
18
2
77
40.2K
Seb Stern
Seb Stern@sseb85·
@GadSaad I call BS. How can the mother know what the baby identifies as before it can talk?
English
0
0
0
8
Gad Saad
Gad Saad@GadSaad·
Wow!
GP Q@argosaki

BREASTMILK She thought she was studying milk. What she uncovered was a conversation. In 2008, evolutionary anthropologist Katie Hinde was working in a primate research lab in California, analyzing breast milk from rhesus macaque mothers. She had hundreds of samples and thousands of data points. Everything looked ordinary—until one pattern refused to go away. Mothers raising sons produced milk richer in fat and protein. Mothers raising daughters produced a larger volume with different nutrient balances. It was consistent. Repeatable. And deeply uncomfortable for the scientific consensus. Colleagues suggested error. Noise. Statistical coincidence. But Katie trusted the data. And the data pointed to a radical idea. Milk is not just nutrition. It is information. For decades, biology treated breast milk as simple fuel. Calories in. Growth out. But if milk were only calories, why would it change depending on the sex of the baby? Katie kept digging. Across more than 250 mothers and over 700 sampling events, the story grew more complex. Younger, first-time mothers produced milk with fewer calories but significantly higher levels of cortisol—the stress hormone. The babies who drank it grew faster. They were also more alert, more cautious, more anxious. Milk wasn’t just building bodies. It was shaping behavior. Then came the discovery that changed everything. When a baby nurses, microscopic amounts of saliva flow back into the breast. That saliva carries biological signals about the infant’s immune system. If the baby is getting sick, the mother’s body detects it. Within hours, the milk changes. White blood cells surge. Macrophages multiply. Targeted antibodies appear. When the baby recovers, the milk returns to baseline. This was not coincidence. It was call and response. A biological dialogue refined over millions of years. Invisible—until someone thought to listen. As Katie reviewed existing research, she noticed something unsettling. There were twice as many scientific studies on erectile dysfunction as on breast milk composition. The first food every human consumes. The substance that shaped our species. Largely ignored. So she did something bold. She launched a blog with a deliberately provocative name: Mammals Suck Milk. It exploded. Over a million readers in its first year. Parents. Doctors. Scientists. People asking questions research had skipped. The discoveries kept coming. Milk changes by time of day. Foremilk differs from hindmilk. Human milk contains over 200 oligosaccharides babies can’t digest—because they exist to feed beneficial gut bacteria. Every mother’s milk is biologically unique. In 2017, Katie brought this work to a TED stage. In 2020, it reached a global audience through Netflix’s Babies. Today, at Arizona State University’s Comparative Lactation Lab, she continues reshaping how medicine understands infant development, neonatal care, formula design, and public health. The implications are staggering. Milk has been evolving for more than 200 million years—longer than dinosaurs walked the Earth. What we once dismissed as simple nourishment is one of the most sophisticated communication systems biology has ever produced. Katie Hinde didn’t just study milk. She revealed that nourishment is intelligence. A living, responsive system shaping who we become before we ever speak. All because one scientist refused to accept that half the story was “measurement error.” Sometimes the biggest revolutions begin by listening to what everyone else ignores.

QST
189
836
9K
1.7M
Harold ☘️
Harold ☘️@Nikk1066·
@sseb85 @jeremymstamper @TheLaurenChen In this case the baby is not being sold because she is the biological child of the parents. What’s happening is that the surrogate is essentially renting out her womb to give birth to a baby she is not genetically related to. It’s bad but in this case it’s not “baby selling.”
English
1
0
4
47
Jeremy Stamper 🇺🇸
Jeremy Stamper 🇺🇸@jeremymstamper·
@TheLaurenChen I’ll go ahead and make the obvious point that both slavery and being murdered are by their very definitions nonconsensual. This must have occurred to you.
English
7
0
66
2K
Seb Stern
Seb Stern@sseb85·
@RobSchneider Let’s not forget, at the start of Covid and the dark horse podcast both Brett and his wife were advocating full masking and taking off their entire outfits at the door when entering their house. Then the information landscape changed as Michael points out - and they pivoted.
English
0
0
0
55
Seb Stern
Seb Stern@sseb85·
@Aella_Girl This is your personal limitation (or preference, if you prefer) projected onto the world - and the logic is backwards When you have that bond with someone you care deeply for you don’t WANT to be with others and vice versa Nothing is forbidden by anyone, it’s simply not desired
English
0
0
2
27
Aella
Aella@Aella_Girl·
i can't really conceive of being monogamous, personally. What would this look like, I get into a relationship with someone and then... forbid them from intimacy with others? tell them i'll leave them if they do? but i wouldn't want to leave them, it wouldn't bother me.
English
173
26
705
681.2K
Seb Stern
Seb Stern@sseb85·
@TiffanyFong To be fair though, if that were the case the opposite would also be true of conservative men.
GIF
English
0
0
0
72
Thomas Chatterton Williams
Thomas Chatterton Williams@thomaschattwill·
The single most attractive quality in a man is generosity. The most unattractive quality is stinginess. The sheer number of men on here who claim to be concerned about picking up a dinner tab for a date it won't work out with is astonishing! So you bought someone dinner, my god.
English
483
281
4.4K
850K
Seb Stern retweetledi
david friedberg
david friedberg@friedberg·
why not just raise income tax rates? because your real intent is not to just “provide healthcare”. you’re masking that you are proposing the creation of, for the first time in the 250 years of this American republic, an organized government seizure of private property from citizens. you’re calling it a “wealth tax” or a “billionaires tax” or “millionaires tax” or whatever nom du jour polls well. but at the end of the day, it’s the seizure of private property from citizens by the government. citizens that earned money, paid their fair taxes on those earnings (53% if they live in California) and are now being told they need to hand over after-tax assets because the government has failed to provide promised services with the revenue it’s collected, and are now re-casting their own failure to be a socio-economic inequity that must be justly resolved... a slippery slope that has never gone anywhere good (see economic effects in USSR, Cuba, Venezuela, France and Norway wealth tax etc.) the American founders fled tyranny in Europe and this amazing nation was populated by immigrants (myself and your parents) from around the world not just looking for a “better life” but for a place where they could have freedom from tyrannical governments that can take what they want from private citizens. a great nation borne of property rights, the rule of law, and endowed freedoms to believe, speak, or act. these principles led to the greatest run of innovations, successes, and widespread increase in prosperity, for all citizens, ever seen. the citizens, the individuals, not the institutions, delivered this progress. those who invented, who toiled, who bled, who sacrificed, who took risk and persevered, who led, and who changed the world, are not charlatans, kleptocrats, or oligarchs. they’re what made us all better off. prosperity is a measure of america’s success, not its failure. it is your principle that is so offensive, as evidenced by the broad disdain for your flippant flirtation with the darkest of human fantasy - socialism. you and other neo-socialists have led so many of us to reflect on America’s history and what it is becoming. that now leads so many to consider, so unnecessarily, leaving their homes for a place where everyone stands up to shout down the principle you suggest. because if your ideas are now considered moderate, it’s clear this titanic is sinking. that a “simple tax” of taking assets that have been earned, through toil and tribulation, rightly taxed, and preserved, should now be unjustly seized, is your solution to a problem of obvious government mismanagement and outright fraud, tells us that your true motivation lies not in giving people healthcare but in cutting down success and deleting the system of prosperity and opportunity for all. i don’t care, and neither should anyone else, what the sum total market value of a private citizens private assets might be. it is none of my business and should be none of yours. because, again, once you open that pandora’s box, we might as well study Lord of the Flies … there is literally nothing stopping 51% of citizens demanding that their government go out and seize 100% of the private property of the 49%. want to give healthcare to people in need? do your job and fix healthcare. make it affordable. want to be lazy about it? then do your job lazily and raise income taxes. want to take private property from private citizens who have paid their fair share of taxes and legally earned their property, then honestly declare that it is envy, not inequity, that you strive to resolve…
English
1.7K
5.6K
39K
4.5M
Seb Stern
Seb Stern@sseb85·
@hungryhorsepokr Not mentioned in the breakdown is that Charlie’s line has to work 5/6 times to make profit by the river. At risk is ~5k to make ~1k. Or taking down on turn occasionally risking ~1.1k to make ~160. Not saying strat is wrong, but stats/reads/freq on the rec matter. Runout. Etc.
English
2
0
13
1.6K
hungryhorsepoker
hungryhorsepoker@hungryhorsepokr·
same hand. two pros. one loses $110. one wins $1,065. we had corey eyring (low stakes pro) and charlie carrel (high stakes crusher) play the exact same spot. here's the difference: we're playing $20/40, and we open BTN with 8♥4♥ to $110. SB folds, rec in BB calls. ~$5k effective. COREY (low stakes pro): flop ($240) A♣Q♣3♥. rec checks, corey checks back. turn ($240) 5♠. rec bets $180, corey folds. result: lose $110 (-2.75bb) corey's thought process: no equity, no reason to continue. fold and move on. this is a winning play. corey lost the minimum. but it wasn't the MOST profitable line. CHARLIE (high stakes pro): flop ($240) A♣Q♣3♥. rec checks, charlie bets $50, rec calls. turn ($340) 5♠. rec checks, charlie bets $885, rec calls. river ($2,110) A♦. rec checks, charlie jams $4,000, rec folds. result: win $1,065 (+26.52bb) charlie's thought process: flop and turn - recs don't want to play for stacks deep without the nuts. charlie bets flop to take initiative. when rec checks turn? he applies massive pressure. river - rec checked again, they're not comfortable playing this deep. here's the key: rec doesn't have boats (would've raised preflop with AQ, raised flop with A3). only boat is sometimes A5s. if charlie had QQ here and jammed, he'd think weak Ax would fold. so if value can't get called by weak Ax when jamming... that opens the door to jam as a bluff and fold out those same hands. charlie jams $4,000. rec folds weak Ax. same hand. one found a winning play. one found the HIGHEST EV play. the difference? charlie recognized recs don't want to play massive pots deep unless they have the nuts, and applied pressure across all three streets to force a fold.
hungryhorsepoker tweet media
English
53
3
114
39.4K
Seb Stern
Seb Stern@sseb85·
@ryangerritsen I think people truly misunderstand how numbers work. Inflation is an accelerational force. Lower (positive) inflation means prices are still increasing. This article headline and sub heading is nonsensical. Unless inflation is a negative number prices still increase, just slower.
English
0
0
0
37
Seb Stern
Seb Stern@sseb85·
@WalderSports The Toronto Blue Jays franchise is everything we dream and wish the Maple Leafs franchise to be… and more.
English
0
0
1
168
Statfax
Statfax@statfax·
It took Vladdy Jr. 1.7 seconds to score from first base on this play 🤯 It is an MLB and World Series record
English
119
101
8.7K
2M