Zephry
69 posts





Humanity has not prevailed ( • ᴖ • 。) AWTF Heuristic is now over and OpenAI has completely demolished human competitors. In the end, humans performed quite well, but the performance of OpenAI was outstanding. I'll post my detailed thoughts about this in a few days, since this deserves a longer commentary.






Reuters: - The CCP has held meetings with top Chinese AI labs (including Alibaba, ByteDance and Z.ai) about potentially restricting overseas access to China's most advanced AI models, including both closed and open-source models. - Under the proposal being discussed, anyone who leaks or steals AI technology might be punishable under China's national security laws. - This initiative may be a follow-on from a May 2026 roundtable discussion of Chinese legal experts regarding regulation of open-source AI. During this discussion, several experts proposed a three-tier system for Chinese AI models: 1. Low-risk open-source models would be subject to a simple filing or a filing exemption. One expert said models under 10B parameters should fit in this category (but this was just an example shared by one panel member). 2. More advanced AI models would be subject to pre-release safety testing and would need to be reported to a regulator. 3. Models implicating national security, risks to critical infrastructure, cybersecurity concerns, sensitive data considerations, or major public interests would not be open-sourced, or would be open-sourced only within a strictly controllable limited scope, and could be restricted to domestic use. - Unclear if and when these rules will become effective and whether they will apply to both current and future models. - Separately, "according to two of the sources, Chinese authorities are deeply worried about the potential for Mythos to exploit software vulnerabilities and that Washington might deploy the model against Chinese interests."


Crazy forecast

.@AnthropicAI has filed a lawsuit against @Abnormal claiming we copied their brand to mislead security customers, and they are asking for “all revenues, earnings and profits” This is obviously not true. They don’t own every A/slash design in AI cybersecurity, and they don’t get to turn a logo dispute into a claim on Abnormal’s entire business. It would be easier to concede quietly. But Abnormal was built on trust, innovation, and intellectual honesty. Values are what you do when tested (especially when inconvenient) Our behavioral security platform and our AI models are ours. Everything meaningful about Abnormal was built the hard way: the technology, the customer relationships, and the trust. We earned that trust by protecting customers, and we will defend it. My blog post about it (link below):

Sources: Chinese AI developer MiniMax is working on a 2.7T-parameter model, dubbed M3 Pro and set for release as early as Q3, and plans to open-source it (@juroosawa / The Information) (Visit Techmeme dot com for the link and full context!)

Filing: Chinese AI model maker Z․ai is seeking to raise ~$4B from the sale of 19.8M shares at ~$202 to ~$216 each, after its stock jumped 1,500% since January (Bloomberg) (Visit Techmeme dot com for the link and full context!)







