Steve Fuest

460 posts

Steve Fuest banner
Steve Fuest

Steve Fuest

@SteveFuest

Saint Louis, MO Katılım Mayıs 2017
926 Takip Edilen196 Takipçiler
Wade and Boone 🇺🇸
Wade and Boone 🇺🇸@TerrierWade·
Wade went to the eye doctor today for his 10 day checkup since getting his eye removed. He is doing great and they got all of the cancer out! 😁 Thank you for all of your prayers and kind words.❤️
Wade and Boone 🇺🇸 tweet media
English
271
114
1.8K
13.2K
Steve Fuest retweetledi
JGIM Journal of General Internal Medicine
JGIM Journal of General Internal Medicine@JournalGIM·
@JournalGIM is planning a medical education themed issue. Submit your #MedEd paper to us by February!
Society of General Internal Medicine (SGIM)@SocietyGIM

.@JournalGIM is requesting submissions for a Medical Education Theme Issue: Evidence, Innovation, & Action in Medical Education. Papers must be submitted by 2/5 & adhere to JGIM's online instructions for authors. Anticipated publication Winter 2025. bit.ly/3tbUkdL

English
0
2
6
2K
Steve Fuest retweetledi
Lisa Rotenstein MD
Lisa Rotenstein MD@LisaRotenstein·
In our new study in @JournalGIM we find electronic inbox work & turnaround time assoc with pts’ likelihood to recommend female but not male PCPs @BrighamWomens With @DBatesSafety @Ted_Melnick @mollyjeffery @ChristineSinsky @rick_gitomer
David Bates@DBatesSafety

Our paper led by @LisaRotenstein is out in JGIM, for female PCPs only, greater patient medical advice request volume, total message volume, and electronic inbox time were associated with a higher likelihood to recommend. rdcu.be/dmDB6

English
1
12
31
7K
Steve Fuest
Steve Fuest@SteveFuest·
Reynolds Ranch County Park
Steve Fuest tweet mediaSteve Fuest tweet mediaSteve Fuest tweet media
English
0
0
9
320
Steve Fuest
Steve Fuest@SteveFuest·
Castlewood Canyon state park
Steve Fuest tweet mediaSteve Fuest tweet media
English
0
1
3
263
Steve Fuest
Steve Fuest@SteveFuest·
@rbganatra awesome @thecurbsiders hotcakes episode! In ELEKT-D, does the sensitivity analysis with modified intention-to-treat impact your concern about differential loss in a non-inferiority trial?
English
0
0
1
19
Steve Fuest
Steve Fuest@SteveFuest·
@rbganatra Maybe during trial design they wanted to avoid sequential testing halving p=.025 and instead just have one with p=.025
English
0
0
0
13
Steve Fuest
Steve Fuest@SteveFuest·
@rbganatra The best answer I could find was in the supplement protocol PDF, page 91: "Since we do not intend to make any claims of superiority or detriment of treatment within the subgroup analysis framework, p-values will not be adjusted for multiplicity."
English
1
0
1
27
Rahul Ganatra
Rahul Ganatra@rbganatra·
Help me out here, critical appraisal nerds: In the ELEKT-D trial, it seems to me that ketamine was both non-inferior AND superior to ECT: NI margin: -10% Primary outcome: +14.2% (+3.9 - +24.2) But, the paper doesn't say that. What am I missing? #statstwitter #epitwitter
NEJM@NEJM

In the ELEKT-D trial, ketamine was noninferior to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) as therapy for treatment-resistant major depression without psychosis. Full trial: nej.md/3ODZMPc Editorial: Ketamine and ECT in Depression — Risks and Rewards nej.md/43jyUIR

English
2
0
4
4.6K

Keşfet

@LisaRotenstein @theNCI @yincaoScD @NODGastro @InadomiJ @bfdrake @AasmaShaukatMD @jlouissaint89