steve o
5.7K posts


@mark_slapinski What a stupid question. Here I'll give it a go.
Man identified as former nazi scalped alive and fed to pigs, was it deserved.
The answer is yes.
English

🚨IT’S NOW OFFICIAL: Gov. JB Pritzker just made Illinois the FIRST state to let people SUE ICE agents for violating their rights.
Federal immunity is blown to hell.
This is the blueprint. Every state needs to wake the hell up and follow.
CALL TO ACTIVISM@CalltoActivism
🚨HUGE: Gov. JB Pritzker has signed a law that creates a pathway to sue ICE agents for unlawful detentions and BANS immigration arrests around Illinois courthouses. This is what protecting due process and fighting federal overreach looks like.
English

@ImBreckWorsham It was a lot of fun fighting wars the last 60 years with nothing to show for it
English

if abortion is ILLEGAL, men abandoning their pregnant partners should be ILLEGAL too. if women can't opt out of PREGNANCY, then men shouldn't be able to opt out of FATHERHOOD either!
Kia 🧸ྀི@xevekiah
what unpopular opinion about ABORTION can put you in this position???
English

@Doomslayer9293 @RjFisher1998 @toJamesConnor No, they are plotting to put bombs at MacDill AFB. 20 million people is an invasion even if you don’t understand that.
English

Ask yourself: If a person born in America isn't an American, what are they?
Why would another country be required to claim them as a citizen?
What if a person was born in America to parents from two different countries?
The Trump arguments against birthright citizenship are impractical nonsense.
English

@Doomslayer9293 @RjFisher1998 @toJamesConnor It’s been tried in every liberal state on some level. In fact I currently can’t own a machine gun. I’ve had my right to bare arms infringed. You tards call it common sense then nod like morons when a invader shits out a kid and says we own them citizenship
English

@steveo71776670 @RjFisher1998 @toJamesConnor Yeah cos your arguments were logical and emotionless lol talking about invader babies. Yknow I’d love to see your reaction to Trump issuing an EO banning all gun ownership, bet you’d be all about that Constitutional absolutism again
English

@Dem_Damn_It @DrJStrategy Call me a dipshit but don’t explain your points. It’s ok someone will tell you how to think later.
English

@steveo71776670 @DrJStrategy I appreciate your thoughtful reply, although I disagree. 👍👍
English

Food for thought.
Trump, Hormuz and the End of the Free Ride
For half a century, Western strategists have known that the Strait of Hormuz is the acute point where energy, sea power and political will intersect. That knowledge is not in dispute. What is new in this war with Iran is that the United States, under Donald Trump, has chosen not to rush to “solve” the problem. In Hegelian terms, he is refusing an easy synthesis in order to force the underlying contradiction to the surface.
The old thesis was simple: the US guarantees open sea lanes in the Gulf, and everyone else structures their economies and politics around that free insurance. Europe and the UK embraced ambitious green policies, ran down hard‑power capabilities and lectured Washington on multilateral virtue, secure in the assumption that American carriers would always appear off Hormuz. The political class behaved as if the American security guarantee were a law of nature, not a contingent choice. Their conduct today is closer to Chamberlain than Churchill: temporising, issuing statements, hoping the storm will pass without a fundamental reordering of their responsibilities.
Trump’s antithesis is to withhold the automatic guarantee at the moment of maximum stress. Militarily, the US can break Iran’s residual ability to contest the Strait; that is not the binding constraint. The point is to delay that act. By allowing a closure or semi‑closure to bite, Trump ensures that the immediate pain is concentrated in exactly the jurisdictions that have most conspicuously free‑ridden on US power: the EU and the UK. Their industries, consumers and energy‑transition assumptions are exposed.
In that context, his reported blunt message to European and British leaders, you need the oil out of the Strait more than we do; why don’t you go and take it? Is not a throwaway line. It is the verbalisation of the antithesis. It openly reverses the traditional presumption that America will carry the burden while its allies emote from the sidelines.
In this dialectic, the prize is not simply the reopening of a chokepoint. The prize is a reordered system in which the United States effectively arbitrages and controls the global flow of oil. A world in which US‑aligned production in the Americas plus a discretionary capability to secure,or not secure, Hormuz places Washington at the centre of the hydrocarbon chessboard. For that strategic end, a rapid restoration of the old status quo would be counterproductive.
A quick, surgical “fix” of Hormuz would short‑circuit the dialectic. If Trump rapidly crushed Iran’s remaining coastal capabilities, swept the mines and escorted tankers back through the Strait, Europe and the UK would heave a sigh of relief and return to business as usual: underfunded militaries, maximalist green posturing and performative disdain for US power, all underwritten by that same power. The contradiction between their dependence and their posture would remain latent.
By declining to supply the synthesis on demand, and by explicitly telling London and Brussels to “go and take it” themselves, Trump forces a reckoning. European and British leaders must confront the fact that their energy systems, their industrial bases and their geopolitical sermons all rest on an American hard‑power foundation they neither finance nor politically respect. The longer the contradiction is allowed to unfold, the stronger the eventual synthesis can be: a new order in which access to secure flows, Hormuz, Venezuela and beyond, is explicitly conditional on real contributions, not assumed as a right.
In that sense, the delay in “taking” the Strait, and the challenge issued to US allies to do it themselves, is not indecision. It is the negative moment Hegel insisted was necessary for history to move. Only by withholding the old guarantee, and by saying so out loud to those who depended on it, can Trump hope to end the free ride.

English

@Dem_Damn_It @DrJStrategy Yes. If it is in our best interest to do so. I subscribe to the realist ideology of international relations. Nation states should act in their own best interest. Years of us securing the global trade routes is us getting cucked by the globe. They can secure their own oil
English

@steveo71776670 @DrJStrategy So you’re saying it’s okay for us to go in, create a crisis, disrupt world markets, and then jump out and say “yall deal with it?” Got it. You’re a dipshit.
English

@ArtemisAether Yes CQ Brown racist piece of shit. Thanks for agreeing with me
English

@steveo71776670 P.O.S. 💩🤖 @steveo71776670 💩🤖TRASH
English

@Doomslayer9293 @RjFisher1998 @toJamesConnor Cute. I love that you went from trying to argue to an angry asshole speaking nonsense 🤣. Classic lefty. All irrational feelings zero thought and logic.
English

@steveo71776670 @RjFisher1998 @toJamesConnor Ooooh watch out, I think I see an anchor baby coming for ya, better shoot up a school just to make sure you get them all
English

@hippyygoat This isn’t a dignified transfer this is a VA hospital. And you are a cunt
English

@AishaDaughter Your self loathing is noted. Go fuck yourself loser
English

@MAGACult2 Army chief of staff has almost nothing to do with Iran war. Unlike what Obama do to McCrystal
English

@ireallyhateyou I support death penalty for all those terrorists cunts that did that.
English

@Suzierizzo1 If men can be drafted for war. Women should be drafted for breeding
English

@charise_lee They were shot down by missiles purchase by the money Obama gave them
English











