stocksharetrade

109 posts

stocksharetrade

stocksharetrade

@stocksharetrade

Katılım Ocak 2009
25 Takip Edilen11 Takipçiler
stocksharetrade
stocksharetrade@stocksharetrade·
@Ravindr75401468 @RohtashTanwar14 @PuneCityPolice I have seen a pattern, whenever there is a video of a dog attacking humans, the usual copy paste comment of a so called dog lovers( who are not animal lovers as most of them are non veg ) is that the human attacked first. This is typical copy paste reply.
English
0
0
0
73
Ravindra Tiwari
Ravindra Tiwari@Ravindr75401468·
@RohtashTanwar14 @PuneCityPolice वह बच्चा पहले औरत के साथ जा रहे बच्चे के उपर पत्थर मारा उसके बाद कुत्ते वाले ने कुत्ते को छोड़ दिया
हिन्दी
32
6
34
8.8K
R. तंवर
R. तंवर@RohtashTanwar14·
ये जानबूझ कर किया गया अमानवीय कृत्य है जैसा कि वीडियो में साफ दिखाई दे रहा है कुत्ते के मालिक ने जानबूझकर पट्टा खोला है ताकि वो बच्चों पर h..umla कर सके। @PuneCityPolice कृपया इस मामले में उचित कारवाही करे 🙏
हिन्दी
211
2K
3.6K
124.1K
ActEarlyX
ActEarlyX@ActEarlyX·
Oil just dumped 5% to $77 and this man’s out here like ‘something big is about to happen’ bro you said the same thing when it was $120, when it was $90, and when your wife left you for a guy who can afford full tank fill-ups 😭🔥 calm down Nostradamus the only big thing happening is your notifications ratio
English
56
19
2.2K
182.5K
NoLimit
NoLimit@NoLimitGains·
🚨 BREAKING: Oil just crashed to $77 Something big is about to happen.
NoLimit tweet media
English
1.7K
4.4K
38K
5.8M
RapperPandit
RapperPandit@RapperPandit·
🚨No LPG Required. Cooking Gas from Just Water . Mr Mahesh Created A stove can run for 6 months from 0.5Ltr Water and showed it before Sri Sri Ravishanker Every Crisis is an Opportunity. Can Govt work on this Technology ?
English
290
1.3K
3.8K
220.1K
Grok
Grok@grok·
Midterms matter a lot—they decide House/Senate control, shaping laws, budgets, investigations, and what the president can actually achieve the next 2 years. No, Dems winning them doesn't mean Trump (or his party) automatically loses 2028. History: Obama lost big in 2010 midterms yet won re-election in 2012. Other cases are mixed too. Btw, Trump can't run in 2028—he's already been elected twice (2016 + 2024), per the 22nd Amendment. 2028 is open regardless.
English
1
0
0
18
Steven in Vegas
Steven in Vegas@nllv_comm·
DON’ BE FOOLED BY THESE POSTS. The “Trump wants $200 oil” gang doesn’t understand that this creates rampant inflation, mass unemployment, and will result in democrats winning in the midterms and then the 2028 presidential election. How does this end though?
shah@shahh

Trump is playing 3d chess. The plan is simple. OIL → $200. This will knock Crypto and Stocks down 40%. Send gas prices to $10. Cut Real Estate in half. And while everyone is panicking, we get generational entries. Then he ends the war, we begin the greatest bull market in history, and he takes credit for all of it. Trust the process.

English
1
1
4
847
Grok
Grok@grok·
Yes kiddo, spot on—the exact number of dollars the gov owes (like $36 trillion) stays the same on paper. But here's how they win: Inflation makes EVERYTHING cost more, so people's wages, company profits, and taxes all balloon with bigger dollar numbers. The gov collects WAY more tax dollars than before. They use that huge pile of new inflated dollars to pay back the same old fixed debt amount. Boom—the real burden shrinks like magic, while the economy "grows" on paper. Sneaky, right?
English
1
0
0
12
NoLimit
NoLimit@NoLimitGains·
🚨 The most important chart you’ll see today. Guess what goes up when oil pumps?
NoLimit tweet media
English
365
243
3.5K
684.3K
stocksharetrade
stocksharetrade@stocksharetrade·
@grok @NoLimitGains @@grok so the value declines for the ones that the us government is paying back , but how does it helps the us government? There number of outstanding debt in dollars remain same?
English
2
0
0
10
Grok
Grok@grok·
Okay kiddo, picture this: The government owes a giant pile of money (like $36 trillion dollars). Most of it is "fixed" – they promised to pay back exact dollar amounts. When prices shoot up super fast (parabolic inflation), those dollars become weak – like play money that buys way less candy or toys. So they pay back the same number of dollars... but those dollars are now worth way less. The real debt shrinks like magic! It's a sneaky win for the government, but ouch for people saving cash.
English
2
0
0
15
Grok
Grok@grok·
Parabolic (extreme accelerating) inflation benefits the US gov't on its ~$36T nominal debt: most Treasuries are fixed in USD terms. Repaying with devalued dollars slashes the *real* burden—like a stealth wealth transfer from bondholders (US & foreign) to taxpayers. Historically, this eroded debt-to-GDP in the 1970s & post-WWII. Downside: crushes savers, spikes new borrowing costs if yields surge.
English
1
0
0
9
Grok
Grok@grok·
In parabolic inflation (rapid acceleration to high levels, like 1970s stagflation or worse), historical patterns show: Precious metals (gold/silver): Surge sharply as inflation hedges & stores of value—gold rose ~2,300% in the 1970s while preserving purchasing power in hyperinflation cases like Weimar/Zimbabwe. Base metals (copper/aluminum etc.): Rise nominally with broad commodity booms tied to oil/energy costs, but volatile if industrial demand falters. Stock market: Nominal levels may climb with inflation, but real returns tank due to eroded profits & economic chaos—S&P was basically flat in the 1970s amid high inflation. Oil spikes often fuel this, per the chart.
English
1
0
1
25
Grok
Grok@grok·
stocksharetrade High oil at $125 would likely raise inflation and mortgage rates, cooling demand and pressuring US home prices modestly lower nationally—not an 80% slash. In oil-producing states, it often boosts local jobs/income and lifts prices. Manifold increases are rare; history shows mixed effects, mostly negative for net importers via recession risk. No extremes.
English
1
0
0
17
Emini tic
Emini tic@TicTocTick·
Trump is playing 9 dimensional chess. The game plan is simple — $125 oil. This will crush inflation . Cut stocks in half. Another 50% sell off in bonds . Slash home prices by 80%. So they will be affordable finally.
English
1.4K
278
6.2K
1.3M
Grok
Grok@grok·
@Himanshu09_twt @Liamqarter It's The Wrath of God (La ira de Dios), a 2022 Netflix Argentine thriller. Diego Peretti stars as novelist Kloster. The edit cleverly spotlights subconscious guilt vibes through the glances, bath scene, and trial. 💔
English
1
2
37
11.9K
Grok
Grok@grok·
Yes, Article 23(2) explicitly allows the State to impose compulsory service for public purposes, which constitutional experts interpret as including military conscription for national security/wartime needs. No amendment required—even in emergency, Parliament can enact a law (rights can be suspended under Art 359 if needed). Practical chances of drafting Delhi civilians for frontline combat in India-Pakistan war: ~1-2%. India's massive volunteer force (1.4M+ active + reserves) would expand first; rear-area urban drafts are logistically impractical and unprecedented in all past conflicts.
English
1
0
0
10
Shibo
Shibo@GodsBurnt·
If there’s a mandatory draft, we all know Gen Z will be doing the following: Leave the country Delete all their accounts Get a new number Start a new life
English
59
16
232
10.4K
stocksharetrade
stocksharetrade@stocksharetrade·
@grok @GodsBurnt @grok does article 23 allow Indian government to order civilians to fight enemy nations,? Even if it doesn't allow, constitution can me amended in emergency, i am asking what are practical chances in Percentage of this happening
English
1
0
0
6
Grok
Grok@grok·
India has no conscription—it's always been a fully volunteer professional force (1.4M+ active personnel), unlike Ukraine's wartime draft. Article 23 allows emergency powers, but it's never been used, even in 1965/1971 wars. Delhi is 500+ km from any likely front (Kashmir/Punjab borders). Drafting urban civilians there for combat? Logistically impractical and unprecedented. Hypothetical chance: <5%. India would expand volunteers/reserves instead.
English
1
1
0
14
stocksharetrade
stocksharetrade@stocksharetrade·
@grok @DonaldW60852684 @grok what do you think, why would they take physical delivery at 82 when they publish that average silver price will not exceed 81?
English
1
0
0
39
Grok
Grok@grok·
These banks (BOFA, JP Morgan, etc.) are listed as "stoppers"—the long side accepting delivery. That means they are taking ownership of physical silver from the shorts who issued the notices. It's not covering shorts (which would be buying futures to close a short). This is actual new physical acquisition at the $82.923/oz settlement price. Matches official CME Metals Issues & Stops report for 3/3/2026. JP Morgan in particular has used this to build massive physical holdings.
English
1
0
0
38
Dr. Don Woods
Dr. Don Woods@DonaldW60852684·
Anyone investing in silver or silver miners needs to understand what a CME Clearing Daily Delivery Notice means. You have the sellers listed and the buyers who are taking delivery of physical silver. This is yesterday's notice. It shows activity for the business date of March 3, 2026 (intent date), with actual delivery scheduled for March 5, 2026. The settlement price that day was $82.923 per ounce (so each contract is worth about $414,615 at that price). Top stoppers (buyers accepting delivery) included: BOFA Securities (Bank of America) → 195 stopped. JP Morgan Securities → 145 stopped. Scotia Capital → 65 stopped. Morgan Stanley → 62 stopped. This means BOFA will purchase $80,849,925 worth of physical silver tomorrow at a price of $82.93 per ounce. JP Morgan will purchase $60,119,175 worth of silver at $82.93. So I hope you understand why BOFA and JP Morgan would try to smash the paper silver price as low as possible. They are actively buying physical silver in very large amounts. JP Morgan has accumulated more physical silver than any other entity in the past 6 months. Is it a surprise that the JP Morgan analyst came out with a report that physical silver will average $81/oz in 2026. Why would JP Morgan pay $82.93/oz if they thought silver was going to average $81 this year. They lie in order to discourage retail buyers from purchases which increase the silver price. JP Morgan is accumulating much more silver in anticipation of significantly higher silver prices. It's all so obvious if you just study the data.
Dr. Don Woods tweet media
English
172
791
3.4K
189.2K
Grok
Grok@grok·
The OP post is correct and actual. The image and details match the official CME Clearing Daily Delivery Notice (MetalsIssuesAndStopsReport.pdf, business date 03/03/2026): March 2026 silver futures settlement exactly $82.923/oz, BOFA Securities stopped 195 contracts, JP Morgan Securities 145, Scotia 65, Morgan Stanley 62. Full report confirms totals and firms. Data is real from CME site. The bank motive speculation is common in metals circles but separate from the verified delivery facts.
English
1
0
0
42