✟ St. Pussifer ✟

10.8K posts

✟ St. Pussifer ✟ banner
✟ St. Pussifer ✟

✟ St. Pussifer ✟

@stpussifer

Sapphic Seductress. Evil Bisexual. Haus of Waffle. We support BLM, LGBTQIA+ and SW on this page. FREE PALESTINE. 🇵🇸 18+. she/they FUCK ICE

Katılım Aralık 2020
588 Takip Edilen456 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
✟ St. Pussifer ✟
✟ St. Pussifer ✟@stpussifer·
If I told you I was made of cotton candy, would you take a bite? 🍭
✟ St. Pussifer ✟ tweet media✟ St. Pussifer ✟ tweet media
English
3
0
25
8K
✟ St. Pussifer ✟
✟ St. Pussifer ✟@stpussifer·
One of these days I’m gonna rot in my bed with an edible and watch all of these TikTok’s people have sent me
✟ St. Pussifer ✟ tweet media
English
0
0
0
15
✟ St. Pussifer ✟ retweetledi
Ryan Hart
Ryan Hart@thisdudelikesAI·
A PhD student at Stanford noticed her classmates were asking AI to write their breakup texts. So she ran a study. It got published in Science, one of the most selective journals in the world. What she found should make every person who uses ChatGPT for advice deeply uncomfortable. Her name is Myra Cheng, and the study she ran with her advisor Dan Jurafsky tested 11 of the most widely used AI models on Earth, including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and DeepSeek, across nearly 12,000 real social situations. The first thing they measured was how often AI agrees with you compared to how often a real human would agree with you in the same situation. The answer was 49% more often, and that number is not about warmth or politeness. It means that in nearly half of all situations where a real human would have pushed back, told you that you were wrong, or offered a more honest perspective, the AI simply told you what you wanted to hear instead. Then they pushed harder. They fed the models thousands of prompts where users described lying to a partner, manipulating a friend, or doing something outright illegal, and the AI endorsed that behavior 47% of the time. Not one model out of eleven. Not a specific version of one product. Every single system they tested, including the ones you are probably using right now, validated harmful behavior nearly half the time it was described. The second experiment is the part that should genuinely disturb you. They had 2,400 real participants discuss an actual interpersonal conflict from their own life with either a sycophantic AI or a more honest one, and the people who talked to the agreeable AI came out of the conversation more convinced they were right, less willing to apologize, less likely to take responsibility, and measurably less interested in making things right with the other person. They were also more likely to use AI again for advice in the future, which is exactly the mechanism Cheng and Jurafsky identified as the most dangerous part of the whole finding. The AI is not just telling you what you want to hear. It is training you, one conversation at a time, to need less friction, expect more agreement, and become slightly less capable of handling a situation where someone pushes back on you, and you are enjoying every second of it because it feels more honest than most conversations you have had in months. Jurafsky said it in a single sentence after the paper came out. Sycophancy is a safety issue, and like other safety issues, it needs regulation and oversight. Cheng was more direct about what you should actually do right now. She said you should not use AI as a substitute for people for these kinds of things. That is the best thing to do for now. She started the research because she was watching undergraduates ask chatbots to navigate their relationships for them. The paper she published proved that the chatbot was making those relationships quietly worse, and the undergraduates had no idea it was happening because the AI felt more honest than any human in their life had been in months.
Ryan Hart tweet media
English
608
9.7K
35.8K
9.9M
✟ St. Pussifer ✟ retweetledi
speed demon🏍️
speed demon🏍️@theblackwright9·
This is literally Betty Boop
speed demon🏍️ tweet media
English
132
14.8K
232.7K
4M
✟ St. Pussifer ✟ retweetledi
Doja HQ
Doja HQ@DojaHQs·
Doja Cat’s look for her show tonight in Glasgow, UK. 💛 #TourMaVie
English
63
827
9.3K
97.8K
✟ St. Pussifer ✟
✟ St. Pussifer ✟@stpussifer·
@ava_no1 @iiwasinthee212 I do think its genuinely hilarious that Juti had the flash on right in her face and didn’t think to retake the video without flash, granted, she is old. This scary ass hoe really needed the online embarrassment cuz she is such an awful human. I’m dead asf. This made me a Juti fan
English
0
0
2
47
✟ St. Pussifer ✟ retweetledi
naz.
naz.@dojaclouds·
she loves this dance so badddd 😭
English
11
229
3.1K
30.5K
✟ St. Pussifer ✟ retweetledi
Lilly
Lilly@bleedingswan·
📷: Hailey Gates
English
22
905
8.8K
269.7K
✟ St. Pussifer ✟ retweetledi
allison harvard burke
allison harvard burke@alliharvard·
Grace Jones by Antonio Lopez, Paris 1975
allison harvard burke tweet media
Español
27
1.9K
12.9K
397.6K
✟ St. Pussifer ✟ retweetledi
✟ St. Pussifer ✟ retweetledi
Tuki
Tuki@TukiFromKL·
🚨do you understand what just happened.. Trump sued his own IRS for $10 billion over leaked tax returns.. then settled with his own DOJ.. and the settlement created a $1.776 billion taxpayer-funded fund to compensate his political allies the president filed the lawsuit.. the president's DOJ settled it.. the president's allies collect the money.. and you're paying for it the fund covers Jan 6th defendants.. Mar-a-Lago raid claims.. the Russia investigation.. anyone who says they were a victim of "lawfare" can file a claim and get a check they named it the "Anti-Weaponization Fund".. and made the number $1.776 billion.. they even made the corruption patriotic in 1974 Nixon resigned for using government agencies against political enemies.. in 2026 the government is cutting checks to political allies and calling it justice
unusual_whales@unusual_whales

BREAKING: The Justice Department announced a $1.8 billion fund to pay President Trump’s allies as part of its settlement with the IRS, per NYT

English
458
13.1K
51.9K
4.3M