Stuart Bell

13.6K posts

Stuart Bell banner
Stuart Bell

Stuart Bell

@stuartbell_

Sobriety Date: 28/02/2018 ⭐️

City of London, London Katılım Ocak 2011
846 Takip Edilen970 Takipçiler
Stuart Bell retweetledi
Patrick Christys
Patrick Christys@PatrickChristys·
I really hope Gary Neville stands as Labour’s candidate to be Mayor of Greater Manchester. Then gets absolutely smashed at the ballot box.
English
266
744
10.7K
112.5K
Stuart Bell retweetledi
Flav
Flav@Flav_Bateman·
All them Arsenal players letting their country down just to lose to Southampton. Peak times.
English
46
691
11K
139.9K
Stuart Bell retweetledi
Southampton FC
Southampton FC@SouthamptonFC·
We had too much for an injury-plagued Arsenal 😉
English
1.4K
8.9K
83.8K
2M
Stuart Bell retweetledi
talkSPORT
talkSPORT@talkSPORT·
"Services to broadcast." 😅
talkSPORT tweet media
English
38
148
4K
141.5K
Stuart Bell retweetledi
Liam Gallagher
Liam Gallagher@liamgallagher·
Cmon CHELSEA
English
620
2.4K
16.9K
713.7K
Stuart Bell retweetledi
Jake Tyson
Jake Tyson@jtyson1993·
Fucking embarrassing, Sosa, Uche get gone.
English
0
1
1
129
Stuart Bell retweetledi
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧@JChimirie66677·
There's a line in a democracy that, once crossed, changes everything: when elections cease to be an obligation and become a variable. That line has now been crossed in Britain, and it's the state's own elections watchdog saying so. The Electoral Commission has been explicit: Labour's justification for delaying local elections is not legitimate. Not unwise. Not clumsy. Illegitimate. Extending mandates damages public confidence, undermines local legitimacy, and creates a clear conflict of interest by letting councils decide how long they can avoid voters. In any functioning democracy, that would end the matter. Here, the government presses on regardless. That's the scandal. This is no longer a party political dispute or a row between Reform and Labour. The referee has intervened and said the game is being rigged, and the players have decided to ignore the whistle. When a government continues with election delays after being told by the independent authority charged with protecting electoral integrity that its reasoning does not hold, the issue stops being reform and becomes power protecting itself. The language Labour uses is revealing. Elections are framed as an inconvenience. Voters are framed as an administrative burden. Democracy is reduced to a cost-saving exercise, something to be postponed if the spreadsheets look untidy or the reorganisation plans are mid-flow. Ministers speak of "capacity constraints" as if the right to vote is a luxury item that must wait until the filing cabinets are rearranged. In a democracy, administration exists to serve elections. Elections do not exist to suit administration. The conflict of interest identified by the Electoral Commission should alarm anyone who still believes in democratic norms. Councils are being asked whether they would like to delay the moment they must answer to voters. That's not consultation. It's self-dealing. No serious system allows those in power to decide how long they may remain there without consent. Yet this is now presented as a "locally led approach," as though outsourcing democratic suspension makes it virtuous. Worse still is the uncertainty. Candidates have been selected. Campaigns have begun. Money has been spent. And with months to go before polling day, the government is still dangling the possibility of cancellation. The watchdog describes this uncertainty as unprecedented. That word matters. Democracies rely on predictability. Once elections become provisional, subject to last-minute ministerial approval, the entire process is degraded. When challenged, ministers retreat into condescension. Chris Bryant waves away concerns as conspiracy and insists that "ordinary people" would think elections are "a bit daft." This is a familiar trick: speak for the public while denying them a voice. Redefine democratic rights as common-sense nuisances that sensible adults should stop fussing over. It's the rhetoric of managed democracy, where participation is tolerated only when it produces the correct outcome. None of this is happening in isolation. Mayoral elections have already been postponed. Now council elections are being pushed back again. The pattern is clear. When the polls turn hostile, the timetable moves. When voters become unpredictable, the vote is delayed. Governments confident in their mandate do not need to buy time. They face the electorate and take their chances. Labour is not doing that because it knows what the numbers say. The danger is not just that millions of people may be denied a vote next year. It's the precedent now being set. Once a government learns it can delay elections after the watchdog objects, after campaigns have begun and candidates are in place, the principle is broken. Elections become conditional. Democracy becomes something you are granted when those in power feel safe enough to allow it. "Chris Bryant waves away concerns as conspiracy and insists that "ordinary people" would think elections are "a bit daft.""
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 tweet media
English
825
5.5K
12.5K
926K
Stuart Bell retweetledi
🤍𝕁𝕆🤍
🤍𝕁𝕆🤍@jomickane·
Consultant Engineer in Wales, forced to stand and speak out against all the Net Zero crap planned for the area. He says none of it adds up or makes sense, somebody is clearly going to make a lot of money if this goes ahead
English
189
3.6K
10.8K
178.3K