Sandeep Kumar Chaudhary

🚨 Outsiders issuing ORDERS to open SBI branch on holidays A CA firm conducting statutory audit mails a @TheOfficialSBI BM on 4th April directing them to open the branch on a holiday for audit work. Since when did external auditors get the authority to override banking norms, security protocols and staff rights? Opening a branch on a holiday is not just “adjustment” it is a serious security risk for cash, documents and officials. For years, staff have been pressured to stretch beyond limits late nights, holidays and now even outsiders are dictating terms? This is not audit. This is institutionalized harassment. Fix the system. Respect rules. Respect staff. #SBI #Banking #WorkplaceRights #BankersVoice #StopHarassment

THE GREAT BANKING BETRAYAL: 🏦A Nexus of Deception by IBA & DFS 🏦 The mask has finally fallen. What was once a "betrayal of trust" has morphed into a full-scale institutional fraud. The Indian Banks’ Association (IBA) and the Department of Financial Services (DFS) are operating as a coordinated nexus to strip bank veterans of their dignity and legal entitlements. While the builders of India’s banking system languish, the elites at the top are lining their pockets. ​The Evidence of Systematic Deceit: ​The RBI Parity Lie (Exhibit-P2): The 1993/94 Settlement isn't a suggestion; it’s a mandate. Clause 2 of the March 1994 minutes explicitly dictates that pension updation MUST follow the RBI pattern. Yet, the IBA continues to feed the Supreme Court "false affidavits" claiming no such formula exists. This is perjury in the highest degree. ​The "Prospective" Arrears Heist (Exhibit-P4): The October 2023 100% DR Neutralization is a calculated insult. By making it "prospective only," the IBA has effectively embezzled ₹10 to ₹15 lakhs in rightful arrears from every single senior retiree. Why are our elders being penalized for the IBA’s thirty-year failure to act? ​The Double Standard (Exhibit-P1A): In 2019, the DFS approved notional pension increases of up to 3.63x for RBI retirees. The formula exists. The money exists. The "lack of funds" argument is a fabricated myth used to gatekeep benefits from PSU bank staff while granting them to others. ​The PLI Scam: While pensioners are told the coffers are empty, the DFS has revised Performance Linked Incentive (PLI) guidelines to benefit the "Top Management" clique—the very same MDs and CEOs who comprise the IBA. They are awarding themselves up to ₹30 lakhs in Performance Linked incentives while simultaneously filing affidavits to dodge RTI accountability. ​The Reality: Institutional Cowardice The IBA (Exhibit-P3) attempts to hide behind the status of a "voluntary body" to evade Writ Petitions and RTI scrutiny, yet they wield absolute power over the lives of lakhs of retirees. ​Supreme Court Precedent is Clear: Pension is not a "bounty" or a "gift" to be given at the sweet will of an employer; it is a hard-earned property right. ​Justice delayed is justice denied. The IBA must stop its "shameless" litigation and predatory delay tactics. Honoring the 1993 settlement is not an option—it is a legal and moral obligation. ​#BankPensionUpdation #IBAExposed #JusticeForBankRetirees #ShameOn_IBA_DFS #StopTheLies #SupremeCourtOfIndia #BankEmployees #RTI #IBA_UFBU_Chor_Hain #DFSMurdabaad #NirmalaSitharamanMurdabaad #NarendraModiMurdabaad @DFS_India @ChiefIba @nsitharaman @narendramodi @ChVenkatachalam @rupamsmail @kanalmedia23 @Hellobanker_in @bankpediaa @bankaffairs @idesibanda @iNitinTyagi

So the bank @TheOfficialSBI is marking me unauthorised absence!! But on what authority? When the resignation was submitted, medical documents provided and repeated communication made via email and WhatsApp about inability to join? I may be absent in your records, but the burden of “unauthorised” should only lie with you. Let me make one thing absolutely clear: do not consider me an employee of your bank anymore. Under no circumstances will I be rejoining. Now, answer my questions..clearly and without evasion: When I applied for a transfer on spouse grounds, why was it neither approved nor rejected on time? After 5 months of continuous follow-up, I received a casual WhatsApp message stating that the request was not submitted through the portal. Is that an official response? Is this the standard of communication your institution follows? When I applied under extreme compassionate grounds, what happened to that application? There was no portal-related condition for such a request, so why was I never informed about its approval or rejection?