Sumit Mazumdar

@devwraithe @rektoff_xyz Actually Cohort 4 (C4) of @rektoff_xyz

@sum1t_here @rektoff_xyz Mad mad! Wdym C5 though? 🤔

@rektoff_xyz Thank you. On to the next 🚀

@rosarioborgesi Just gotta remember what @PatrickAlphaC says every thing in the Blockchain is public

📌 Why “private” variables in Solidity are still public Most people think private in Solidity means hidden. It doesn’t. Everything stored onchain is public 👇

@rosarioborgesi Bad tokenomics can't be patched with good code. Seen protocols with flawless Solidity get drained because the economic design had a hole in it. The exploit wasn't in the contract. It was in the model.

When you start studying DeFi protocols, you realize that knowing Solidity is only half of the job. A lot of financial mechanisms sit behind these protocols: liquidity, collateralization, incentives, interest models, peg stability, liquidations. Being a good coder is not enough. You also need to understand the economic design that makes a protocol work. That’s one of the reasons I started making these DeFi videos: to learn these protocols deeply myself and help others understand them. If you're learning DeFi this playlist might help 👇 youtube.com/playlist?list=…

It no longer makes sense to pay for documentation hosting platforms. We made a tool to help you always write docs for both human and AI consumption. You can ingest this package to have a standard for your docs. Perhaps we should turn it into a skill. github.com/Cyfrin/claude-…

🚨Ethereum Developers: you can now install your first AI Auditor in 1 minute - fully autonomous, available 24/7, with multiple sub-agent helpers. Open Source. FREE to use (with your AI model) and already finding vulnerabilities in smart contracts. Link below🫡

@rosarioborgesi Hey @rosarioborgesi following you from the past 8 months may be, you are really determined and showing daily Lgmi

I see many people talking about building a career in AI or crypto. I made my choice a year ago. I decided to pursue the path of a Solidity engineer and now I’m doubling down on it. I chose to follow my passion because that’s what allows you to do your best work. If you don’t truly like what you do, no amount of reasoning or money will sustain you long term.

@iamsachin_47 @kirat_tw ka ai/ml course sponsor kardo

After seeing Tech Twitter recently, one thing I understood is unemployment in our country is really high. - people are making fake accounts with Amazon Intern mentioned - doing rage bait on any given topic to just get more comments and views - getting in controversies to again boost engagement - writing tweets like "> worked as a dishwasher >blah blah... >now he is Jensen Huang" My request to these folks is - please study and upskill. Bolo toh 2-4 logo ke courses I will sponsor. But stop doing bull shit on this platform.

@sourabhbgp Accurate on both counts. Adjusting accordingly.

@sum1t_here the 'algorithm magic' is just the friends we made along the way (and by friends i mean unpaid consultation requests) real talk tho - the algo rewards replies more than posts. you're fishing in the wrong pond

tech Twitter: "just build in public and opportunities will find you" me: posts projects consistently for months opportunities: 0 random people asking for free work: 23 LinkedIn recruiters for jobs I'm not qualified for: 47 still waiting on that algorithm magic

@sama Sam doing a Saturday night AMA to defend the Pentagon deal the vibes are not good

Three general things from this AMA: 1. There is more open debate than I thought ther ewould be, at least in this part of Twitter, about whether we should prefer a democratically elected government or unelected private companies to have more power. I guess this is something people disagree on, but…I don’t. This seems like an important area for more discussion. 2. I think the is a question behind a lot of the questions but I haven’t seen quite articulated: What happens if the government tries to nationalize OpenAI or other AI efforts? I obviously don’t know; I have thought about it of course (it has seemed to me for a long time it might be be better if building AGI were a government project) but it doesn’t seem super likely on the current trajectory. That said, I do think a close partnership between governments and the companies building this technology is super important. 3. People take their safety (in the national security sense) more for granted than I realized, which I think is a good thing on balance but I don’t think shows enough respect to the tremendous work it takes for that to happen. Also, I am on the whole very grateful for the level of reasonable and good-faith engagement here. It was not what I expected.

I'd like to answer questions about our work with the DoW and our thinking over the past few days. Please AMA.

@francis_codex reposting the same argument doesn't make it more true we disagree. that's fine. good luck out there grow up brother

@francis_codex brother you're on Twitter telling strangers to give up on their dreams because a Stanford study said hiring dipped if you're so secure in your position why are you this pressed about noobs trying? sounds like you're worried they'll figure out the game faster than you want them to

nah bro, your “build, adapt, repeat” thing made sense in 2020 when companies actually hired juniors to do grunt work and trained them up. that era’s dead since late 2022, ai handles 50-80% of what entry-level devs used to do - boilerplate, basic debugging, simple features. gone those 3-year “seniors” climbed a ladder that still existed. today’s noobs are staring at a broken one stanford data: employment for 22-25 year old devs in ai-exposed roles dropped nearly 20% from late 2022 peaks signalfire: big tech new-grad hires are now 7% of total headcount, down over 50% from pre-pandemic, 25% from just 2023 ai didn’t kill learning. it killed the free on-ramp telling complete beginners to “just start” without being real about what that actually means now - prove ai mastery, ship real impact, day one - is copium and nah, i’m not scared of anyone catching up. i’ve been in this long enough to know exactly what i’m doing. i’m just done pretending easy mode still exists like you are, keep lying to yourself sucker

If you are a complete noob and you have plans to go into tech (especially the development side) just give up, because you will never catch up

@francis_codex I read it. I disagree. AI didn't kill the game for noobs. it killed the game for people who stop learning. 3 years ago or today, the principle is the same: build things, adapt, repeat if you think noobs are screwed, what's your advice? just don't start?

@sum1t_here bro, are you listening to yourself, “…learned to code 3 years ago…” are we not saying the same thing? 3 years ago was claude and openai even a thing? you just come out and say things, did you ever read my take?

AI will replace developers any day now meanwhile I just spent 2 hours Debugging why my app won't build the problem: a missing comma in package.json The singularity can wait. I have syntax errors to find.

@WhiteHouse We've reached the point where the President of the United States is beefing with a chatbot company on main 2026 is absolutely unhinged

"THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WILL NEVER ALLOW A RADICAL LEFT, WOKE COMPANY TO DICTATE HOW OUR GREAT MILITARY FIGHTS AND WINS WARS! That decision belongs to YOUR COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF, and the tremendous leaders I appoint to run our Military.  The Leftwing nut jobs at Anthropic have made a DISASTROUS MISTAKE..." - President Donald J. Trump

@ns123abc Wait hold on Anthropic told the Pentagon no while OpenAI, Google, and xAI all said yes? I was ready to roast them and now I'm... impressed? Character development nobody expected

🚨 Anthropic CEO Tells Pentagon “NO.” >pentagon: “use claude for ALL lawful purposes” >dario: no >pentagon: do as we say or you’re blacklisted >dario: “these threats do not change our position” Anthropic CEO final message to Department of War: >no fully autonomous weapons without humans >no mass domestic surveillance for Americans Pentagon official calls Dario a “liar with a God-complex” who “wants to personally control the US Military” and is “ok putting our nation’s safety at risk.” >xAI, Google & OpenAI all agreed to the Pentagon’s terms Anthropic: “Regardless, we cannot in good conscience accede.”

@AnthropicAI Anthropic: "distillation is a national security threat" Also Anthropic: releases Claude with an API anyone can hit 10,000 times to train their own model Bro you can't sell the recipe and then get mad when people cook

Distillation can be legitimate: AI labs use it to create smaller, cheaper models for their customers. But foreign labs that illicitly distill American models can remove safeguards, feeding model capabilities into their own military, intelligence, and surveillance systems.

We’ve identified industrial-scale distillation attacks on our models by DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, and MiniMax. These labs created over 24,000 fraudulent accounts and generated over 16 million exchanges with Claude, extracting its capabilities to train and improve their own models.