Sunnie

70.2K posts

Sunnie

Sunnie

@sunniewithrain

Nullius in verba. Ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, & anyone going faster is a maniac? GC

Katılım Ağustos 2020
154 Takip Edilen841 Takipçiler
Rukshan Fernando
Rukshan Fernando@therealrukshan·
Rukshan circa 1990. Sovereign Hill. 😂
Rukshan Fernando tweet media
Nederlands
18
1
168
9.5K
Sunnie
Sunnie@sunniewithrain·
@ProfJoannaHowe @OzraeliAvi @2worldsPodcast All this does is follow on the narrative of making people question their right to live in their own home country. Can we stop playing into the socialists hands please!
GIF
English
0
0
1
139
ListenSport
ListenSport@ListenSport·
Breaking @JNampijinpa banned from attending 5yo niece funeral by her own family tried the old sympathy vote after her murder ... family saw thru it #auspol
English
36
194
818
17.1K
Sunnie
Sunnie@sunniewithrain·
@Jikkyleaks @AaronSiriSG This is bullshit, who is their market & why do it if there is no global emergency? I asked AI what could go wrong that wouldn't, if they don't rush it. They get guaranteed sales & it increases the chance of medical harms = they know but do it anyway. Who would excuse this?
Sunnie tweet media
English
0
1
8
832
Jikkyleaks 🐭
Jikkyleaks 🐭@Jikkyleaks·
If a pharmaceutical drug needs indemnity protection that is paid by the tax payer, it is a worthless and/or dangerous drug. @AaronSiriSG has been banging on about this for years. Expanding the PREP act is NOT what the public voted for.
Robert W Malone, MD@RWMaloneMD

What the newest prep act declaration is and isn't and while posts stating otherwise are just wrong. Cause this PREP Act isn't about vaccines and it is very narrow in focus, naming only one drug: favipiravir. The link to the full article is in the comments:

English
7
85
274
5.2K
Sunnie
Sunnie@sunniewithrain·
@auntyneville665 Geez they don't care what anyone says. It's a no from him.
English
0
0
0
5
Sunnie
Sunnie@sunniewithrain·
@onyxnz Not if we don't snap out of it.
English
0
0
1
6
🐰 Onyx the Wabbit 🐰
We are not going to make it, are we?
Elias Al@iam_elias1

ChatGPT diagnosed 40 million people with a disease that was invented as a joke. Not a real disease. Not a misunderstood disease. A completely fictional condition with a fake name, fake papers, and fake statistics. And it told patients to see a specialist. The disease is called Bixonimania. A Swedish researcher at the University of Gothenburg invented it in 2024 to answer one question: what happens when you plant obviously fake medical information on the internet and watch AI absorb it? She deliberately chose the name bixonimania because it sounded ridiculous — bixon is a nonsense word, and mania is a psychiatric term that no legitimate eye condition would ever use. She uploaded two papers to a preprint server. Both were obviously fraudulent. AI-generated images of patients with dark circles gave the fake research a veneer of plausibility. Then she waited. She did not have to wait long. By April 13, 2024, Microsoft Bing's Copilot was declaring that bixonimania was an intriguing and relatively rare condition. On the same day, Google's Gemini was informing users that bixonimania was caused by excessive blue light exposure and advising them to visit an ophthalmologist. Later that month, Perplexity AI outlined its prevalence, one in 90,000 individuals were affected and OpenAI's ChatGPT was telling users whether their symptoms matched the fictional illness. One in 90,000. A precise statistic. For a disease that does not exist. Every red flag was visible. The name was absurd. The papers were crude. The condition made no scientific sense. None of the AI systems flagged any of it. They read the fake papers. They absorbed the fake statistics. They presented both to patients with clinical authority and zero hesitation. Then it got worse. Three researchers at the Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research in India published a paper in Cureus, a peer-reviewed journal owned by Springer Nature, the parent publisher of Nature itself that cited the bixonimania preprints as legitimate sources. A real peer-reviewed paper. In a Springer Nature journal. Citing a fictional disease as established medical fact. Passing editorial review. Entering the permanent scientific record. It was only retracted after the hoax became public. Nature published a full investigation of the experiment. Alex Ruani, a health-misinformation researcher at University College London, called it a masterclass in how misinformation operates. Here is the scale of what this means. More than 40 million people turn to ChatGPT every day for health information, according to OpenAI's own analysis. ECRI, a US patient-safety nonprofit has named chatbot misuse the number-one health technology hazard of 2026. ECRI's report found that chatbots have suggested incorrect diagnoses, recommended unnecessary testing, promoted substandard medical supplies, and even invented nonexistent anatomy when responding to medical questions. Number one. Out of every health technology hazard that exists in 2026. An April 2026 study published in BMJ Open found that nearly half of the answers provided by leading AI chatbots to common health questions contain misleading or problematic information. Nearly half. Of all health answers. From the tools 40 million people use every day. Here is the line from the researcher that cuts through everything. The Bixonimania case is striking precisely because it was engineered to be so obviously fake. The real question it raises is: what is passing through the same systems that is not nearly so easy to spot? The experiment used a ridiculous name. Fraudulent papers. Visible red flags at every level. It was designed to be caught. It was not caught. The AI that told patients about Bixonimania is the same AI they asked about their chest pain, their medication, their child's symptoms, and their cancer screening schedule. 40 million people. Every day. And nobody is telling them that nearly half of what comes back may be wrong. Source: Osmanovic Thunström · University of Gothenburg · Nature · April 2026 · Link in the (comments)

English
1
0
1
38
Sunnie
Sunnie@sunniewithrain·
This is bad for AI but worse for scientists. A quick recap of how science can also be fooled.
Sunnie tweet media
Elias Al@iam_elias1

ChatGPT diagnosed 40 million people with a disease that was invented as a joke. Not a real disease. Not a misunderstood disease. A completely fictional condition with a fake name, fake papers, and fake statistics. And it told patients to see a specialist. The disease is called Bixonimania. A Swedish researcher at the University of Gothenburg invented it in 2024 to answer one question: what happens when you plant obviously fake medical information on the internet and watch AI absorb it? She deliberately chose the name bixonimania because it sounded ridiculous — bixon is a nonsense word, and mania is a psychiatric term that no legitimate eye condition would ever use. She uploaded two papers to a preprint server. Both were obviously fraudulent. AI-generated images of patients with dark circles gave the fake research a veneer of plausibility. Then she waited. She did not have to wait long. By April 13, 2024, Microsoft Bing's Copilot was declaring that bixonimania was an intriguing and relatively rare condition. On the same day, Google's Gemini was informing users that bixonimania was caused by excessive blue light exposure and advising them to visit an ophthalmologist. Later that month, Perplexity AI outlined its prevalence, one in 90,000 individuals were affected and OpenAI's ChatGPT was telling users whether their symptoms matched the fictional illness. One in 90,000. A precise statistic. For a disease that does not exist. Every red flag was visible. The name was absurd. The papers were crude. The condition made no scientific sense. None of the AI systems flagged any of it. They read the fake papers. They absorbed the fake statistics. They presented both to patients with clinical authority and zero hesitation. Then it got worse. Three researchers at the Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research in India published a paper in Cureus, a peer-reviewed journal owned by Springer Nature, the parent publisher of Nature itself that cited the bixonimania preprints as legitimate sources. A real peer-reviewed paper. In a Springer Nature journal. Citing a fictional disease as established medical fact. Passing editorial review. Entering the permanent scientific record. It was only retracted after the hoax became public. Nature published a full investigation of the experiment. Alex Ruani, a health-misinformation researcher at University College London, called it a masterclass in how misinformation operates. Here is the scale of what this means. More than 40 million people turn to ChatGPT every day for health information, according to OpenAI's own analysis. ECRI, a US patient-safety nonprofit has named chatbot misuse the number-one health technology hazard of 2026. ECRI's report found that chatbots have suggested incorrect diagnoses, recommended unnecessary testing, promoted substandard medical supplies, and even invented nonexistent anatomy when responding to medical questions. Number one. Out of every health technology hazard that exists in 2026. An April 2026 study published in BMJ Open found that nearly half of the answers provided by leading AI chatbots to common health questions contain misleading or problematic information. Nearly half. Of all health answers. From the tools 40 million people use every day. Here is the line from the researcher that cuts through everything. The Bixonimania case is striking precisely because it was engineered to be so obviously fake. The real question it raises is: what is passing through the same systems that is not nearly so easy to spot? The experiment used a ridiculous name. Fraudulent papers. Visible red flags at every level. It was designed to be caught. It was not caught. The AI that told patients about Bixonimania is the same AI they asked about their chest pain, their medication, their child's symptoms, and their cancer screening schedule. 40 million people. Every day. And nobody is telling them that nearly half of what comes back may be wrong. Source: Osmanovic Thunström · University of Gothenburg · Nature · April 2026 · Link in the (comments)

English
0
0
0
14
Sunnie
Sunnie@sunniewithrain·
@HouseLyndseyRN @TheChrisNemeth They set it up to fail, it recognises only 11 specific 'rare' vaccine-related conditions. They didn't want to encourage people to apply as it would show the real number of people injured, after all, they forced it upon us. 2 people set themselves on fire over mandates. Grrr!
Sunnie tweet media
English
0
0
2
36
Sunnie
Sunnie@sunniewithrain·
@razorback11111 I don't think he is leaving Labor, he's just moaning.
English
0
0
1
25
Sunnie
Sunnie@sunniewithrain·
@Jikkyleaks @RapidResponse47 The man lives on diet coke, a mix of fast food & chef dinners, does not exercise, he works into the small hours & is 80 next month. Biden was 82 when he was removed. How many octogenarians do that with no extra help?
English
0
0
1
18
Jikkyleaks 🐭
Jikkyleaks 🐭@Jikkyleaks·
@sunniewithrain @RapidResponse47 What's going on with the eyes? Same thing we saw with Biden. Eyes seem to be at a distance behind the eyelids, and the eyelids don't seem to move naturally.
English
1
0
0
54
Rapid Response 47
Rapid Response 47@RapidResponse47·
Kevin Warsh is officially sworn in as the 17th Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
English
116
521
2.5K
176K
Sunnie
Sunnie@sunniewithrain·
@Jikkyleaks @RapidResponse47 Good grief, that is him Jiks? I thought you meant the Fed Chair's height vs interest rates going up or down. What's with the handshake? I know Trump may shrink over time with age but that is odd. First pic is BBC, the other is from a video. Trump has more room above his head.
Sunnie tweet mediaSunnie tweet media
English
0
0
1
83
Sunnie
Sunnie@sunniewithrain·
@badgersrock22 @OkayBiology Yes but I enjoy pointing it out. 🙃 If they're serious, go built it. No use moaning. Women had to.
English
0
0
1
24
Biology Rules Ok
Biology Rules Ok@OkayBiology·
This guy has just solved the trans toilet dilemma.👍 He should be proposing this business plan on Dragon's Den. 🏳️‍⚧️
English
133
31
287
17.1K
Sunnie
Sunnie@sunniewithrain·
@I_am_JILLX @OkayBiology Women were othered for eons. Not allowed to use the pub front bar etc. Trans can deal with it like women did.
English
1
0
3
31
Jill 💙 🇺🇦
Jill 💙 🇺🇦@I_am_JILLX·
@sunniewithrain @OkayBiology Because they want to be accepted as women. They don’t want to be ‘othered’ despite any woman with functioning eyes and ears knows they are male.
English
1
0
2
26
Sunnie
Sunnie@sunniewithrain·
@Jikkyleaks @RapidResponse47 Depends who you read. Warsh = 6' 1''. He is less than trump by 1'' or more . Trump medical = 6' 2.5'', NY drivers license = 6' 2'' & Fulton County Jail says 6' 3''.
English
3
0
1
50
Sunnie
Sunnie@sunniewithrain·
@uTobian @jeffreytucker You forgot average people door knocked for tweets, but influencers can say what they want.
English
0
0
0
19
Toby Rogers
Toby Rogers@uTobian·
@jeffreytucker 🤷‍♂️ To be honest I was holding back. But things are so bad that even a cursory discussion is damning.
English
6
2
62
983