sunny 'imagine'

8.5K posts

sunny 'imagine' banner
sunny 'imagine'

sunny 'imagine'

@sunnyriver

signal curator @fairdotclub

Katılım Şubat 2023
1.3K Takip Edilen27.2K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
sunny 'imagine'
sunny 'imagine'@sunnyriver·
Arch Network is turning every UTXO into programmable yield. Bridgeless DeFi on L1. • @Saturn_btc: Runes trading in real time - the same sat that bought your coffee now earns 8% APY in a pool. • ArchVM: Smart contracts on Bitcoin, no L2, no wrappers. • Titan Indexer: Runes hit 70% of BTC tx volume, then choked on indexing & UX. Titan + pre-confirmations = sub-second finality on L1. Runes now become liquid. • FROST+ROAST: Bridges are the original sin of DeFi. $3B+ hacked since 2021. Arch’s FROST+ROAST multisig keeps assets on L1, verifiers only sign execution, not custody. Bridge hacks? Solved. Bitcoin is no longer just digital gold. It’s about to become yield bearing programmable collateral. lfg @ArchNtwrk $GIZMO $PUPS
sunny 'imagine' tweet media
English
27
35
189
9.2K
sunny 'imagine' retweetledi
theWZRD
theWZRD@WzrdAp·
おはよう!!!! 🪄✨🌏☮️☀️✨🌟✨✨✨✨
theWZRD tweet media
日本語
8
3
26
315
sunny 'imagine'
sunny 'imagine'@sunnyriver·
NFTs and DAOs didn’t die because the underlying desire disappeared They died because the first version was mostly financial slop wrapped in idealistic bs That demand is still here People still want internet-native ownership, coordination, status, and upside They just don’t want to get funnelled through the same gross mix of vague governance, broken incentives, and extractive wrappers Projects like @realmsdaos & @fairdotclub are the next wave of innovation here actually connecting the trust and accountability layers beneath all of this to make them actually useful and legible in the real world
TBPN@tbpn

.@cz_binance says that NFTs and DAOs will make a big comeback. "I think tokenizing art is probably going to come back at some point, multiple times. I don't know when it will really hit big and stay... I think all of those things eventually should be much bigger than they are today." "I think many things will have a second wind, but the second wind will most likely be a little bit different... DAOs, NFTs — the next iteration may be slightly different, but they may still be called NFTs or something like NFT2."

English
2
6
7
854
sunny 'imagine'
sunny 'imagine'@sunnyriver·
@kloss_xyz Because most people still want to believe virality and value are the same thing
English
1
0
2
270
sunny 'imagine'
sunny 'imagine'@sunnyriver·
you should be harnessing the intelligence these ai companies are spending trillions building right now you’re probably still using it like a chatbot really make these companies work for you learn: - how to aim the ai - how to give it context - how to turn it into research, leverage, output, strategy, execution. that’s when it stops feeling like a chatbot and starts feeling like you’ve got frontier intelligence on demand point it at your actual life, work, business, and decisions. it’s worth going deeper trust me the people who benefit most from AI won’t be the ones who played with it it’ll be the ones who learned how to direct it
Andrej Karpathy@karpathy

Judging by my tl there is a growing gap in understanding of AI capability. The first issue I think is around recency and tier of use. I think a lot of people tried the free tier of ChatGPT somewhere last year and allowed it to inform their views on AI a little too much. This is a group of reactions laughing at various quirks of the models, hallucinations, etc. Yes I also saw the viral videos of OpenAI's Advanced Voice mode fumbling simple queries like "should I drive or walk to the carwash". The thing is that these free and old/deprecated models don't reflect the capability in the latest round of state of the art agentic models of this year, especially OpenAI Codex and Claude Code. But that brings me to the second issue. Even if people paid $200/month to use the state of the art models, a lot of the capabilities are relatively "peaky" in highly technical areas. Typical queries around search, writing, advice, etc. are *not* the domain that has made the most noticeable and dramatic strides in capability. Partly, this is due to the technical details of reinforcement learning and its use of verifiable rewards. But partly, it's also because these use cases are not sufficiently prioritized by the companies in their hillclimbing because they don't lead to as much $$$ value. The goldmines are elsewhere, and the focus comes along. So that brings me to the second group of people, who *both* 1) pay for and use the state of the art frontier agentic models (OpenAI Codex / Claude Code) and 2) do so professionally in technical domains like programming, math and research. This group of people is subject to the highest amount of "AI Psychosis" because the recent improvements in these domains as of this year have been nothing short of staggering. When you hand a computer terminal to one of these models, you can now watch them melt programming problems that you'd normally expect to take days/weeks of work. It's this second group of people that assigns a much greater gravity to the capabilities, their slope, and various cyber-related repercussions. TLDR the people in these two groups are speaking past each other. It really is simultaneously the case that OpenAI's free and I think slightly orphaned (?) "Advanced Voice Mode" will fumble the dumbest questions in your Instagram's reels and *at the same time*, OpenAI's highest-tier and paid Codex model will go off for 1 hour to coherently restructure an entire code base, or find and exploit vulnerabilities in computer systems. This part really works and has made dramatic strides because 2 properties: 1) these domains offer explicit reward functions that are verifiable meaning they are easily amenable to reinforcement learning training (e.g. unit tests passed yes or no, in contrast to writing, which is much harder to explicitly judge), but also 2) they are a lot more valuable in b2b settings, meaning that the biggest fraction of the team is focused on improving them. So here we are.

English
0
5
5
414
sunny 'imagine'
sunny 'imagine'@sunnyriver·
The wild part about private digital money is that a lot of existing power depends on being able to watch the money move what happens when financial privacy stops being a niche privilege and starts becoming infrastructure? because once visibility stops being automatic, control stops being automatic too W zk
mert@mert

zk money is so cool man using cryptography to move unstoppable secret quantum proof money at planetary scale is some awesome sci fi shit

English
0
5
6
481