Suren Garegin

@Natalia_yael4 Girls

What is your favorite thing about Israel 🇮🇱?

@VividProwess Shalom my Jew brothers and sisters! You are not alone, we stand with you! You are the nation whose looking for a peace in region and all the world, your history is great! Be glad stand with you my friends!

Non-Jewish people who show support for Israel may not fully understand the depth of our appreciation towards you. I genuinely take pride in the immense amount of love and unwavering support for Israel that we receive from non-Jewish people worldwide.

@mrvllxx @MaximeGauin Stop dodging with insults.

@suroogg @MaximeGauin If naming authors is not the same as proving the claim, what’s the point of your whole argument? You are the one putting the same names over and over again, without any claim? Are you dumb, or do you think people are dumb?

It’s honestly hilarious how, in debates about the Armenian Genocide, many Turkish nationalists do the same thing: when their argument falls apart, they ask one last question, immediately block me, and then pretend I “couldn’t answer.”

@mrvllxx @MaximeGauin My argument is not “names.” My argument is that an absolute claim requires direct proof. You said the Special Organization took no part. So prove that specific claim. Which source shows no role in deportation enforcement, convoy attacks, or organized violence?

@mrvllxx @MaximeGauin This is not complicated. I asked for evidence for one specific claim: “The Special Organization took no part.” A real answer would cite the source and explain it directly. Instead you gave insults, vague references, and now a lecture about “standards.” That’s evasion, not evidenc

@suroogg @MaximeGauin In this current situation what you’re doing is only manipulating with a big hypocrisy and mumbling for nothing.

@mrvllxx @MaximeGauin One disputed trial does not erase that record.

@MaximeGauin @suroogg Arguing with this guy is worse than arguing with a cat, or a wall. At least it wouldn’t be this annoying.

@mrvllxx @MaximeGauin Wangenheim and Morgenthau are hard to dismiss because they were foreign diplomats reporting during the events, not Armenian activists writing later. Add deportation orders, missionary reports, survivor testimony, confiscation, and demographic destruction.

@mrvllxx @MaximeGauin Asking for a specific source is not manipulation. I asked a simple question: which evidence refutes Wangenheim, Morgenthau, the Special Organization, demographic destruction, or the Ottoman indictment? Calling that “mumbling” does not answer it.

@suroogg @MaximeGauin Suren it’s clear from 100 miles away that you are just manipulating and mumbling, and i realized you are doing that on purpose. Just empty repeats and pointless objections. Total waste of time..

@mrvllxx @MaximeGauin I asked for evidence for one specific claim: “The Special Organization took no part.” The answer was “read my article” and insults. If the evidence is so clear, state it directly. Otherwise this is not debate; it is evasion.

@hakediyosunama @MaximeGauin @ThraggPasha @GerardAraud You say “tons of evidence,” but give no specific refutation here. Insults don’t prove anything. Pick one point — Ottoman records, German/Austrian reports, U.S. diplomats, survivor testimony, deportation orders, or demographic destruction — and actually refute it.

@suroogg @MaximeGauin @ThraggPasha @GerardAraud Sana tonlarca kanıt sunmuş, iddialarını bir bir yalanlamış hala boş konuşuyorsun. Hayatında bu kadar yer etmemiz sağlıksız, git biraz çimene bas.

Une lecture des derniers recensements de l’empire ottoman conduit à la conclusion qu’il abritait entre 1,5 million et 2 millions d’Arméniens en 1914. La question est simple : où sont-ils passés?

@mrvllxx @MaximeGauin @ThraggPasha @GerardAraud My point is not “one document proves everything.” It is that the evidence is cumulative.

@suroogg @MaximeGauin @ThraggPasha @GerardAraud “The evidence is cumulative: Ottoman records, German/Austrian allies, U.S. diplomats, missionaries, survivors, deportation orders, and demographic destruction.” Please show some proper examples, you just repeat this in your last 3-4 tweets.

@mrvllxx @MaximeGauin @ThraggPasha @GerardAraud Sure. Examples: Talaat’s deportation orders, German Ambassador Wangenheim’s reports to Berlin, U.S. Ambassador Morgenthau’s reports, Ottoman postwar indictments, and the demographic destruction of Armenian communities across Anatolia.

They don’t want debate. They want monologue.

Another genocide denialist @MaximeGauin blocked me right after being asked to prove one specific claim. They can write “read my article” 50 times, name-drop authors, and call everyone ignorant — but the moment you ask them to defend one concrete point, they run.

@MaximeGauin Funny how these people can deny genocide, insult you, scream “read my article,” and name-drop authors all day — but when you ask them to defend one specific claim, suddenly they disappear. They don’t want debate. They want a safe room for denial.

@MaximeGauin @mrvllxx or irregular operations. Citing Erickson, Safi, and Shaw does not make an absolute claim true.

@suroogg @mrvllxx Exactly, I demonstrated that, but you refuse to read, you refuse to read Edward Erickson, you refuse to read Polat Safi, your refuse to read Stanford Jay Shaw, you just repeat nonsense like a machine.

@MaximeGauin @mrvllxx Calling me a liar is not a historical argument. If you answered it, link the specific tweet and identify which point it refutes: Wangenheim, Morgenthau, Special Organization, demographic destruction, or the Ottoman indictment. Otherwise you are just replacing evidence with insult

@suroogg @mrvllxx I already answered on that in a specific tweet. You are liar.

@MaximeGauin @mrvllxx Armenians, deportation enforcement, escort operations, or attacks on convoys? Because that is much harder to defend than simply disputing one Akçam quotation.

@suroogg @mrvllxx Literally everything you shared. The orders of Talat are fakes for some of them ("Andonian documents"), authentic but crudely misquoted and mistranslated for others. The Special Organization took no part in the relocation and crimes. The indictment of 1919 was abandoned...