greensurvomystery
340 posts


@MakoKenji @Nocty16 @Wifi_Failure @berry_gatherer Them saying that they want a directors take on somthing, does not mean they agree with what you are saying
English

@Nocty16 @survomyservo @Wifi_Failure @berry_gatherer See how you avoided the SCP analogy because deep down you agree with me. The director can interpret the story all he wants. He can not or at least should not ignore something as fundamental as multiple levels. At least give us a few. That's not hard.
English

@MakoKenji @Nocty16 @Wifi_Failure @berry_gatherer I would like to see a movie where its someone's vision of scp. And not some fan service stuff. They could put popular scps in there. But that's it
English

@Nocty16 @survomyservo @Wifi_Failure @berry_gatherer But you would expect to see 173 and 106 and would be disappointed to not see him. Which is my point.
English

@MakoKenji @TheFnFan @Wifi_Failure @berry_gatherer That's diffrent because that's a movie and a TV series following a 1000 page novel. The backrooms is spread out among different creators with their own visions of what the backrooms is. Which is following a 4chan post
English

@survomyservo @TheFnFan @Wifi_Failure @berry_gatherer "I don't like Pennywise as a villain. Lets make an IT movie without him." - This how you sound.
English

@MakoKenji @Wifi_Failure @berry_gatherer If somone made a scp movie they would probably barely use any of the INTERNET MADE scps. Realistically, they would probably use the most popular ones like the ones you said. Along side with their own, new interpretations of scps
English

@survomyservo @Wifi_Failure @berry_gatherer Ok so If I made a SCP movie and didn't include 173 or 106 you wouldn't be mad because there's no such thing as true lore in no copyrighted media? I'll wait...
English

@MakoKenji @TheFnFan @Wifi_Failure @berry_gatherer No bro, I don't want to see "level: 120575727475828191948584828395838292827374757283857383 the clown room" or smth like that.
English

@survomyservo @TheFnFan @Wifi_Failure @berry_gatherer You can say that but most people would agree that Backrooms should have multiple levels. Like I can't believe this is even an argument?
English

@MakoKenji @Wifi_Failure @berry_gatherer Mf there is no "true lore" every creator has their own interpretation of the backrooms to do whatever they want with it. Its not like the backrooms is copyrighted.
KEY WORD: INTERPRETATION
English

@survomyservo @Wifi_Failure @berry_gatherer You don't have to like the true lore but if you want to make a movie about Backrooms, then you should respect the lore. You can't just tell your own bastardized version because it is convenient to you.
English

@TheFnFan @Wifi_Failure @berry_gatherer The movie is called 'Backrooms', not 'Kane Parson's Backrooms.' Ignoring the broader lore for his own personal take is extremely selfish. Don't y'all get mad at directors who do this. Adapt the true lore not your own personal interpretation.
English

@MakoKenji @Wifi_Failure @berry_gatherer Mf, what you are thinking of is the shitty tiktok interpretation of the backrooms. If you actually watched kanes backrooms series on YouTube, you can tell that its miles better than the tiktok shit
English

@Wifi_Failure @berry_gatherer That's extremely selfish and arrogant to ignore the lore and just say "only my version counts." Everyone knows that the Backrooms consists of multiple levels and entities. No matter how much Kane might want to monopolize the lore.
English

@theguy_blah @survomyservo @zerowontmiss I can assure you I watched it yesterday, don't listen to these slobs on Twitter all they do is hate and whoever says the ending wasn't good is probably not smart enough to comprehend it
English

@KaneHypeGuy I think a great quote for the backrooms is "nothing is real but nothing is fake"
English















