Hassan | SwiftCap EAs

331 posts

Hassan | SwiftCap EAs banner
Hassan | SwiftCap EAs

Hassan | SwiftCap EAs

@swiftcapeas

MQL5 developer turning trading ideas into code. I build MT5 EAs and post what they do.

Katılım Şubat 2023
22 Takip Edilen87 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Hassan | SwiftCap EAs
Hassan | SwiftCap EAs@swiftcapeas·
Been quiet on here for too long. Time to change that. I'm Hassan. I build MT5 Expert Advisors that automate forex trading. Started because I was tired of sitting at a screen all day manually trading. Spent months learning MQL coding, backtesting strategies, blowing test accounts. Now I have EAs with 50+ copies sold on MQL5, a Discord community, and prop firm accounts running my own algos. Going forward I'm posting: - Real EA performance. No cherry picking. - Behind the scenes of building & improving algos - My 100K prop firm challenge running on my own EA - Honest takes on the trading space No fluff. No Lamborghinis. Just systems, results and the real journey. If that's your thing - follow along: linktr.ee/swiftcapeas #ForexTrading #AlgoTrading #ExpertAdvisor
English
1
0
4
677
Angelo Ciaramello
Angelo Ciaramello@savedbyfx·
What is the best forex prop firm? Feel like the industry quietly stopped growing.
English
9
0
7
2.5K
Tanzeel Ahmed
Tanzeel Ahmed@TanzelAhmed·
What is the highest single payout record in FundedNext Futures? Does anyone know? I am going to break the all time record for the highest single payout in a futures prop firm at @fnfutures I’m up $270K on Day 2 with my 5×$50K Rapid Accounts. (Each account is sitiing at $54000 in profit)💀 Day 1: Made $27K Day 2: Made $27K Now I need $60K in total profit to meet the 40% consistency requirement. Then I can request my first capped payout of $7,500. After the 5 payouts, I can withdraw all this profits. It is going to become the largest single payout ever from a Future prop firm. InshaAllah 🤍 @fnfutures @Flynnn_FN Loading……🤍
Tanzeel Ahmed tweet media
English
67
12
168
10K
Hassan | SwiftCap EAs
Hassan | SwiftCap EAs@swiftcapeas·
@itsnataliapl Solid stuff, they will start compounding real soon. What was the amount spent in purchasing the accounts in these 2 yrs?
English
1
0
1
256
Natalia P
Natalia P@itsnataliapl·
I have been trading for 2 years now. I received 4 payouts in total from CFD firms totalling at 12,067 $ Do you think it’s a fast progress or slow progress? I think sometimes I am a bit harsh on myself Gotta be grateful for not giving up #propfirmtrading #tradingjourney
Natalia P tweet mediaNatalia P tweet mediaNatalia P tweet mediaNatalia P tweet media
English
41
6
277
10.5K
Hassan | SwiftCap EAs
Hassan | SwiftCap EAs@swiftcapeas·
3 months ago I started the $100K 2 Step FundingPips Challenge using my automated trading system and documented every week right here on X. Today — PASSED. ✅ Now the real challenge begins - keeping the funded account for as long as possible.
Hassan | SwiftCap EAs tweet media
Hassan | SwiftCap EAs@swiftcapeas

Week 7 of 100k Phase II FundingPips Challenge. Fully Automated. 3.3% for the week. 4.2% profit overall. After 3 months of starting this challenge, we are finally getting closer to passing the challenge. Fully automated disciplined trading at play.

English
1
0
3
603
D. Martin
D. Martin@dmartin_trading·
@swiftcapeas Nice! I have a range breakout but it was flat in June
English
1
0
1
26
D. Martin
D. Martin@dmartin_trading·
I track 14 Darwinex traders. I use them as my performance benchmark. In June their cumulative returns were -3.60%... The average return was -0.26%. Conclusion? June was a tough month
D. Martin tweet media
English
14
1
51
3K
Hassan | SwiftCap EAs
Hassan | SwiftCap EAs@swiftcapeas·
@EthanTrades13 Interesting, Gold was a losing month for you. Are you predominantly long on gold? Because it had some good downside movement throughout the month.
English
0
0
0
15
Ethan Hartwell
Ethan Hartwell@EthanTrades13·
Month 4 complete. June: +1.64% YTD: +20.86%. • 6 sleeves live (5 green, 1 red) • Gold was the only losing sleeve • Added 3 new sleeves for July • Trades copied across 8 prop firms + 1 live account One of the biggest advantages of prop firms is horizontal scaling📈
Ethan Hartwell tweet mediaEthan Hartwell tweet mediaEthan Hartwell tweet media
English
2
0
4
326
FundingPips
FundingPips@fundingpips·
A new day means new opportunities. Trade your plan and stay disciplined.
English
15
15
181
15.6K
Hassan | SwiftCap EAs
Hassan | SwiftCap EAs@swiftcapeas·
@dmartin_trading I think correlation to some extent will always be there. When market is in certain regime, almost all of the strategies might fail. Even better different traders, results would be similar during certain market conditions like we saw this April.
English
1
0
3
76
D. Martin
D. Martin@dmartin_trading·
Month 3 of Live Algo Trading is completed. I had my first red month on one of my accounts and it was a big hit. This month taught me a lot. Returns: FTMO 100K: -2.2% FTMO 10K: +0.45% E8 200K: +0.41% I did a full write up of the main takeaways this month which are on the topic of: Proper Correlation Analysis in Portfolio Construction and The Asymmetric Nature of Markets and it's impact on strategy development & overfitting risks. The full details on my performance is here: denelio.com/journey/jun-29… Here's the TL;DR for my June: My FTMO 100K account took the biggest hit, finishing -2.4%, while my FTMO 10K and E8 200K finished slightly positive at 0.45% and 0.41%. The main issue on the 100K was correlation risk. My FTMO 100K trades 5 Nasdaq strategies. I thought these strategies were diversified enough, but June exposed that they were far more connected than I realized. When Nasdaq had clean trends in May, that correlation worked in my favor so I overlooked it. In June however, when Nasdaq was more choppy, the same correlation amplified the downside. After deeper analysis, I rebuilt my portfolios with a stricter focus on keeping strategy correlation (weekly bucket) below roughly 0.20, which I find is a good rule of thumb. This is used alongside a rolling correlation analysis. The second major takeaway was that markets are not symmetric. My long strategies continued to show strength, but the short side performed terribly live and failed on new 2008–2017 OOS data I got access to. This made it clear that I had overfit the short side by assuming the same logic that works long should also work short. I have now separated my long/short strategies by removing the overfitted short side. In July, the focus will be on improving portfolio weaknesses by adding: One more long only index breakout, two Long only mean reversion and later developing proper short only strategies.
D. Martin tweet media
English
6
0
30
1.8K
Kieran Duff
Kieran Duff@kieran__duff·
If your strategy has a session or time-of-day filter, check what your data does on the daylight-savings changeovers. The broker's server time can shift relative to the actual market session twice a year, and your "London open" filter is suddenly firing an hour off for half the year. Either leave the parameters open to adjust or add a DST filter within the code to adjust automatically.
English
6
0
33
1.8K
Hassan | SwiftCap EAs
Hassan | SwiftCap EAs@swiftcapeas·
@Ashuragamez Start with YouTube for basic tutorials, and play around with ai for coding. Establish a framework on how to generate and test the strategies and start with simple ideas like breakout strategies.
English
0
0
1
16
D. Martin
D. Martin@dmartin_trading·
The best retail trader I have ever seen is this guy right here: SYO, the #1 trader on Darwinex. He has a 9 year track record and around $16M in investor capital. And yet… he sells a course. A lot of people assume that if a trader sells a course, it means they cannot trade well enough to make money from trading. In this case, that argument clearly does not hold up. I have yet to see another retail trader come close to his performance. But I think the reason he sells a course can be seen in his track record itself. When you analyze his drawdowns, he went through several. The biggest ones lasting 269 days, 180 days and 187 days. Three separate times, he went more than 6 months without making new money from trading. Now imagine trading is your main source of income. You are doing everything correctly. Following your system. Managing risk. Staying disciplined. And still, for over 6 months, no new income comes in. Now add real life on top of that. Rent. Bills. Family. Responsibilities. Unexpected expenses. You are in a drawdown, making no money, but life keeps charging you every month. I do not care how experienced or mentally strong you are. That will take a serious toll on you. Having another source of income changes everything. Whether it is a course, mentorship, software, a trading service or something else, stable income outside of trading can reduce the psychological pressure massively. And I think this is one of the main reasons so many profitable traders eventually offer trading related services. Yes, some genuinely want to teach and help others. But I think for many, the bigger reason is much simpler: Trading income is irregular. Even when you are very good, you can go months without making money. So building another income stream is not always a sign that someone cannot trade. Sometimes it is a sign that they understand the reality of trading better than most. This is just my opinion, but it answers something I always wondered: Why do so many profitable traders eventually sell something? I think this is the reason.
D. Martin tweet media
D. Martin@dmartin_trading

The more I trade, the more I don't want to be a "full time" trader. When trading is going good, you feel on top of the world and don't see the need for it not being your main source of income but when you go through those inevitable drawdowns it's a different story. I completely get why most traders (profitable ones) sell a course, offer a mentorship or other trading related services. Most will not admit it but the main reason I believe is because full time trading is not as "Free" as it is painted. The "you are your own boss", you can work whenever and wherever you want and there is huge scaling potential pitch, is true in theory. But in practice, you realize it is not that smooth.

English
16
5
137
20.1K
D. Martin
D. Martin@dmartin_trading·
After doing a few of crosschecks, this strategy does not meet my criteria for being robust. A lot of people recommend Connor's RSI as a good mean reversion strategy but it does not pass all my checks despite being profitable. My quest on finding a mean reversion strategy continues. Maybe I need to be less rigorous on how robust I expect Mean Reversion strategies should be. I can find robust and profitable breakout and trend following strategies with my eyes closed but I cannot develop a solid MR strategy even after months of trying. Do robust mean reversion strategies exist less or is it just a skill issue?
D. Martin@dmartin_trading

Very rare I test an idea I see on twitter and it is profitable. This idea is solid. Works on all major indices I tested it on (struggles on DAX but still profitable). I added a slight variation to the logic and this is the performance. $1000 risk per trade. 2021 - 2026 is OOS for the variation I did. Performance: Period: 2014 - 2026 Trades: 166 Win Rate: 71% Sharpe: 0.82 Ret/DD Ratio: 7.3 I have not ran much robustness checks yet but If I am not wrong I think this is a variation of the Connor's RSI strategy, so it should be robust

English
10
0
22
3.5K
PJ Trades
PJ Trades@PJtrades_NQ·
Y'all don't realize how good you have it with prop firms. Do the math. $350 trade x 20 accounts = $7000 Copy trading is a money printer IF you actually know how to trade.
English
31
33
617
33.8K