Teabagcartoon

bloo might be the ragebait king

🚨 Altman texts Musk: "we offered you equity when we established the capped profit. you didn't want it at the time." (Altman drafted this with Shivon Zilis, then sent it to Musk that night.) OpenAI's lawyers' plan was to use this to argue Musk's lawsuit is competitive warfare — he was offered for-profit equity, refused only because he wanted control. Musk on the stand today: >"How can I have equity in a non-profit?" That single sentence inverts the defense exhibit. If OpenAI offered Musk equity, OpenAI was already operating like a for-profit. Musk refusing the equity proves he understood the original charter. And in the same text, Altman wrote: "I personally have no equity and never have." Two years later, it was revealed Altman secretly owned the OpenAI Startup Fund.

Elon’s lawsuit against OpenAI has one massive problem: His own emails make it very hard to argue that he was always against OpenAI becoming a for profit. The receipts suggest something much more awkward: He wanted a for profit OpenAI. He just wanted to control it.

OpenAI will probably win because Elon’s case has one fatal problem: He has to convince the court that OpenAI’s structure is a betrayal, while OpenAI has receipts showing he wanted a profit structure too, just with himself in control. That does not look like defending the mission. It looks like losing the throne and suing the kingdom.