Sabitlenmiş Tweet
bran
1.5K posts

bran
@tearsien
TheBest. Villain. Hero. Mysterious "Unseen" Cyber Athlete
1999 Katılım Eylül 2012
435 Takip Edilen39 Takipçiler

Here is the missing clip of my interaction with Dalton Eatherly aka ChudtheBuilder that was edited out originally. And it’s clear you can see why: once I started making him realize I knew who he really was, and came at him with logic, he shifted his tone.
And giving the information that’s been made public over the weekend, I was right. Hope you seek help.
Thanks @parti_king
PartiKing@parti_king
A white man tried to have a civil conversation with chudthebuilder… then the vibe completely shifted “Once this is over you’ll never be Hirable” things started getting intense REAL fast
English

@clipmateee The real gigachads are the ones who come from one side being super mixed and the other side being super white (me). My moms side is German, scottish, british, and french. My dads side is jamaican scottish, and native american. So I look white and I have superior genetics. EZ
English

@mineraldepress1 @Hitchslap1 Apparently clear definitions are confusion, and opinions can be said to be ignorance without debate. Ironic, you use the words ignorant and confusing when that's all your comments shows to me.
English


@Taccm77 @Eaglemeagle12 @dom_lucre If getting sucker punched and tackled to the ground after walking away isn't life threatening, then I don't know what is.
English

@Eaglemeagle12 @dom_lucre The guy he shot was not threatening his life; in fact, it was the opposite. Chud pulled out his gun, and the guy fought back out of fear of getting shot, clear self-defense. Chud is guilty as FUCKKKK.
English

🔥🚨DEVELOPING: Footage has released of ChudTheBuilder with Tyson Hockley claiming you’re supposed to put Black people ‘on the ground and then you go live on Kick and say look at this dead nigger laying on the ground’ and ‘that’s how you go viral’ amid the claims from his fans that he never had violent racist intentions
English

@Kogot117 @XRPistheKING @BoomerDivvies In the term of 2-3 years, you definitely can. Most of those statistics are in the terms of 10-20 years though.
English

@XRPistheKING @BoomerDivvies No you can't. No one can. Blackrock JP Morgan vanguard no one had a fund that does this. Shit just look at your user name.
English

@Darrex__ @half0 @Hitchslap1 what's ironic is my measured IQ from I test I think does a disservice is most likely much larger than yours
English

@half0 @Hitchslap1 And was this a response worth responding to? I predicted it.
English

@tearsien @Hitchslap1 "I won't respond unless it is within my narrow frame of reference."
Fuck off with your low IQ ultimatums.
English

@lttlefoot @BeanGeniePNW @Hitchslap1 You are ignorant, you put value in a test that does not give enough credit to those with high "true" intelligence. This is the opinion of many great scientists like Einstein and Hawking.
English

@tearsien @BeanGeniePNW @Hitchslap1 You’re claiming to speak on behalf of intelligent people, but it’s based on your opinion of who is intelligent
If we take your word for it, this is an arbitrary group of people who don’t like “IQ”. Maybe that’s because they have low IQ
English

@jihadi321 @numbers64149076 @Hitchslap1 We are talking about IQ tests doing a disservice to true intelligence.
It seems you lacked the context.
English

@tearsien @numbers64149076 @Hitchslap1 Shockley’s iq was tested in her youth at 129.
We are talking about 85 iq
Try to keep up
English

@jihadi321 @numbers64149076 @Hitchslap1 To add, I think there is a reason you picked the lower range of IQ scores, those people aren't likely to have academic success due to their environment, and habits. How about Richard Feynman, William Shockley, James Watson & E.O. Wilson. These men were considered too average
English

@jihadi321 @numbers64149076 @Hitchslap1 This is a confirmation bias, anyone who would test at 85 IQ would be unlikely to use their full potentional intellectually. This is where IQ can be useful for employers, but not so useful is finding someones innate ability to learn.
English

@half0 @Hitchslap1 Final remark, probably won't respond to u again unless you say something worth responding to, but do you believe all definitions are unquestionable or undebateable? Definitions are meant to be challenged, you should read more philosophy, and more about the REAL scientific method
English

@tearsien @Hitchslap1 Nah you argued it for me by example.
Thanks for that
English

@ThatOneNuge @BeanGeniePNW @Hitchslap1 The definitions I supplied were entirely correct, but were given nuance. I have an opinion on what intelligence really is, and I used a known and very real definition to describe what I believe. They do not argue, because they do not have an argument and do not like paraphrasing
English

@tearsien @BeanGeniePNW @Hitchslap1 Dude was talking about your definitions, not your opinions.
Or as I like to call them, your pan-seared scallops over linguine alfredo. Since we can just decide any series of phonemes means whatever we want.
English

@jihadi321 @numbers64149076 @Hitchslap1 You're arguing the average, the not exceptions. I'm not willing to disservice the exceptions due to the average
English

@tearsien @numbers64149076 @Hitchslap1 If you had ever interacted with people with low iq you would know this is fucking stupid
English

@Asso_LaVolpe @Hitchslap1 Flat eathers reject definitons and systemic trust. Try harder for the insult
English

@tearsien @Hitchslap1 This is also how flat earthers argue.
English

@tearsien @Hitchslap1 "I couldn't care less about textbook definitions."
-- A proper example of being low IQ
English
bran retweetledi








