Hunter

Confluence > Influence

@blknoiz06 Imagine not being able to say anything about RH chain lmao

this is the CRAZIEST two weeks of my crypto career and ive been here since 2017 I CTOd the $ANSEM token around the same time I called the BOTTOM on $BTC and $SOL

Two giants! @Lighter_xyz listing $cashcat. What a massive event. This will leave ripple effects for years to come.

@Bandit0x0 what if 100 people bought 1% supply?

right this is fucking crazy what is happening rn 70% , 80%, 90% is being sent to these people they are literally supply mogging each other. Superman and other devs getting motion off sending the most percent to these guys. Im doing a 1% coin im never selling and i want to see how high it can go so this is the 1% coin $1%

Three weeks in! Season 1 has 218 wallets earning 100,000 points per day pro-rata, 2.1M points distributed to date Nest now has $1.25M TVL across three sources ($572K PSM + Kamino reserves, $352K tokenized equity collateral, $327K Meteora nUSD LP positions, with $737K nUSD in circulation, backed at 125%, and snUSD is paying 6% APY from real protocol revenue 40,600 $NEST burned via daily buyback Verifiable at app.nestusd.com/stats

@nodes explain like I'm five, whats the compute used for?

fullported for the culture $Cabinet

$1 and a dream coin launches, goes to 80k then dumps to 6k. @a1lon9 TWEETS about it, confirming the narrative guess what happens next: 1) the guys who held the coin get rewarded for their conviction 2) new coin under the same ticker launches and everyone's attention switches to it, the old coin slowly bleeds to zero qPorq2UQuP6g1KZnGKMQEfVxN87BYvaYdqVy3KVpump DZMYSwA1qTAGzJWij6TS2zCU8KbWtRCHuReL52aFpump You used to get rewarded for things like this. Now you're punished.

$1 and a dream coin launches, goes to 80k then dumps to 6k. @a1lon9 TWEETS about it, confirming the narrative guess what happens next: 1) the guys who held the coin get rewarded for their conviction 2) new coin under the same ticker launches and everyone's attention switches to it, the old coin slowly bleeds to zero qPorq2UQuP6g1KZnGKMQEfVxN87BYvaYdqVy3KVpump You used to get rewarded for things like this. Now you're punished.

2kBH6UcR8TitebUbKNYNvjUkSFWaiFBJ7nAPTKQwpump $ชั้ง return to tradition

@elonmusk @XFreeze We call it Interlink

There will also ultimately be >100k V3/V4/V5 satellites for Starlink broadband and direct to cellphone connectivity. If growth continues, Starlink will one day carry the majority of Internet traffic. At that point, it is the Internet and everything else just connects to Starlink.

Starlink V3 is a massive capacity leap From SpaceX’s S-1: Starlink V2 • Launched February 2023 • 96 Gbps downlink capacity Starlink V3 • Launch targeted for 2026 • 1,024 Gbps downlink capacity That is roughly a 10.7× jump This is the next phase of Starlink: • More bandwidth • More capacity • More users served • More global connectivity V2 helped scale Starlink to 9,600+ satellites and ~10.3M subscribers. V3 looks like the layer that pushes Starlink from “satellite internet” closer to true global broadband infrastructure

$SPX6900 forgotten, but only by the narrowminded LONG LONG LONG

@aminulive @BinanceUS its "supposed" to

@teh_hunt @BinanceUS Isn’t The WLFI stuff supposed to adversely affect this rather?

Trading for $TRX is now live on @BinanceUS! What’s new: 🔸 Trading is available on the TRX/USD and TRX/USDT pairs 🔸 Deposit or withdraw TRX via the TRON network

@yungcontent rl sims

i really think the sims renaissance is otw

This Is World Tyranny, Not World Liberty Financial — Here's Why This proposal has been packaged as a "governance alignment signal" and a "long-term commitment," but strip away the packaging and what you have is one of the most absurd governance scams I have ever seen. Let me break it down. I. Vote Against and Get Punished — Classic Coercion Tactic This is not a legitimate voting exercise, not even close.  The design of this proposal is a logical trap: anyone who votes against it has their tokens locked indefinitely with no unlock path whatsoever. In other words, if you oppose this proposal, you get punished. This is not voting. This is coercion. What kind of democratic process rewards agreement and imprisons dissent? II. Voters Have Been Selectively Frozen Out I personally hold approximately 4% of the voting power, yet my tokens have been frozen and I am forced out of this voting process. I am not alone. A large number of holders with significant voting rights are in the same position. Meanwhile, the team controls the power to freeze tokens — they decide who can vote and who cannot. What does this mean? It means the outcome was determined before the vote even began. This is not a governance vote. This is a performance where the police have already barricaded the doors of parliament and only let their own people inside to raise their hands. The voter pool has been purged. Only yes votes remain. The result of such a vote carries no binding force whatsoever. III. All Actual Power Has Been Seized by Anonymous Actors The actual control over the WLFI smart contracts lies in the hands of a 3/5 anonymous multisig and a single anonymous guardian EOA has the power to blacklist addresses holding WLFI. Let me emphasize — anonymous. This anonymous multisig can override any vote result and execute any operation directly at the contract level. The so-called governance proposals, on-chain votes, and community discussions are nothing but theater. Real power has never been yielded to anyone but themselves and it’s laughable that they try these tricks to fool the community. The bottom line is this, the power sits with anonymous wallet addresses whose owners nobody knows or can verify. This is not decentralized governance. This is dictatorship wearing the mask of a DAO. IV. Voters Must Identify Themselves, but the Rulers Are Anonymous — Worse Than Tyranny Here is the most ironic part: WLFI requires every participating voter to complete identity verification, electronically sign acknowledgements, and meet compliance eligibility requirements. You want to exercise your rights? Show your face first. But who are the guardian and multisig signers who hold the power of life and death over the contract? Nobody was told and there is absolutely no transparency.  While the governed must identify themselves, the governors with absolute power are anonymous. Your voters must register, submit to scrutiny, and be vetted and dictated how to vote— while your dictators won't even show their faces. V. A Naked Violation of Property Rights Worth Billions of Dollars Let us not forget the real stakes of this proposal: this is not some trivial parameter adjustment or protocol upgrade. This vote seeks to decide the unlock schedule for billions of dollars in assets, the reallocation of governance and vesting rights, and most extreme of all, the permanent destruction of billions of tokens. This is a naked expropriation of holders' property rights. In an environment where voting against the proposal is punished, where large numbers of holders have been frozen out of voting, and where actual control rests with anonymous wallets, using this sham vote to decide the fate of billions of dollars in assets? This is not governance. This is a sham and flies in the face of what this protocol was meant to be. No society governed by the rule of law would permit this. In traditional financial markets, any asset disposition of this scale would require rigorous regulatory review, independent board approval, and minority shareholder protections. Here, a few anonymous wallets get to decide everything. The permanent burning of tokens means holders' property is irreversibly destroyed, no compensation, no recourse, no due process. This has gone far beyond the realm of so-called "decentralized governance." This is a systematic violation of property rights. Conclusion I repeat that this proposal is not governance. It is an exercise of power by the selected few who are carefully engineering a further power consolidation and property expropriation operation. Dissenters are punished for voting no. Opponents are frozen out. Actual control lies with anonymous wallets. Those who exercise their rights must prove their identity while the fate of billions of dollars in assets is decided by a sham vote. This is not what decentralized finance was meant to be, results produced under these sorts of conditions carry no legitimacy, should not have binding force, and should not be recognized. I call on all WLFI holders to see this proposal for what it truly is, to voice their opposition across all public channels, and to reserve all legal rights of recourse.

@level941 @pigeon941 howd trojen get the tokens?

@level941 Money talks vs talks