Chives

284 posts

Chives

Chives

@tehchives

Advocate for self custody and transparency in all forms. Own your investments. https://t.co/p4qC2LCda2 tehchives on reddit/discord

Katılım Ekim 2012
83 Takip Edilen410 Takipçiler
Chives
Chives@tehchives·
@Sehgal_ankit Congrats, Ankit! You have a great team there, passionate and dedicated.
English
1
0
1
35
ankitsehgal
ankitsehgal@Sehgal_ankit·
Thanks you all the amazing guests!
XXIM Podcast@xximpod

Grok (xAI) Just dropped the Verdict on XXIM 🔥 @xximpod is one of the fastest-rising and most respected specialist blockchain podcasts of 2025, already top 5–8 globally ⚡️ Global Crypto Podcast Rating: 8.5–9/10 → Content Depth & Focus: 9.5/10 → Host Knowledge: 9.0/10 → Guest Selection: 9.5/10 → Neutrality & Credibility: 9.0/10 → Growth Trajectory: 10/10 → Production Quality: 7.5/10 (raw & real and getting better 🤌) → Discoverability/Reach: 7.0/10 (but exploding) #XXIM #Blockchainpodcast

English
1
0
8
253
Chives
Chives@tehchives·
@itsalwaysrains @JFWooten4 @6days1week @Hanezeve64 @blocktransfer It's the best case scenario. An equitable and transparent market structure that is more transparent, more resilient, and more trustworthy than legacy solutions while also requiring less maintainance and allows for easy consistent reporting and auditing.
English
1
0
5
142
AlwaysSadButTruthful
AlwaysSadButTruthful@itsalwaysrains·
This process can create "phantom shares" in the market, as highlighted in the context of "naked short selling." explaining SI%, FTD's, and cycles, through deeper level instruments and arrangements. -_- lost in the depths of the data, i am.
AlwaysSadButTruthful@itsalwaysrains

repo participants are on the hook for long term bubbles. think LTCM and 2008. so they sell swaps on indexes and etfs and redeem the swaps, to cover the debts of the bubbles. +rehypothecate them at the block trade level so others cant see whats going on at the swap record level.

English
1
1
39
2.7K
Chives
Chives@tehchives·
@beyond_mythos @exspiracolo @Rob_Tedesco11 My impression is that you can DRS any class of shares - any class issued by a company is as valid as the others, even if voting power varies heavily. I don't see how DRS would help common shareholders democratically if another class which carries majority voting power.
English
1
0
1
40
beyond-mythos
beyond-mythos@beyond_mythos·
Thank you. Agreed. To your second point, yes. Are Class A holders still owners of the company? Are they only owners of a quotation on the stock ticker? This is what Graham said a hundred years ago, how people behave anyway - but they were owners at the time. Not today, through the indirect holding system and through multiclass ownership. For the first there is a solution (DRS), but for the second? @6days1week, @tehchives would love your opinion on this.
English
3
0
1
126
beyond-mythos
beyond-mythos@beyond_mythos·
Why is $CHWY doing an offering of $1bn and "not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of shares of Class A Common Stock by the Selling Securityholder", being their holding company with super majority voting Class B shares, BC Partners [1]. I mean, honestly? Last year $CHWY bought back shares for $997m [2], spending all their cash flow from operations of 2024 and 2023 and now they are issuing for roughly the same amount but not getting ANYTHING, while BC Partners takes it all? And meanwhile they agree to use another $100m of their funds to buy back and retire shares? How can this be in the best interest of Class A shareholders, meaning all retail holders? It really feels like the post I did one year ago was titled exactly right! "$CHWY's Cavern of Corporate Greed", go read it if you haven't -> x.com/beyond_mythos/… This really doesn't look like Ryan's style, does it? I know, it was Ryan's baby, but right now I see BC Partner tunneling out enormous profits of this great company which is shielded by Class B majority super voting shares against activist investors, run by overpaid executives with super low stakes themselves [3]. See? Lets only pick their CEO Sumit Singh and see what he personally does with his $CHWY stock... if he buys, using his own money? Oh apparently he sold for $180m so far never investing a penny of his own money [4]. You know, all this talk about @ryancohen disappointing with $GME is so weak. He made the company profitable against all odds, he takes no salary, he uses his own money, he only decides between hold or hodl. I salute and love him for what he is doing, even if it takes longer than we anticipated. [1] sec.gov/Archives/edgar… [2] sec.gov/Archives/edgar… (search for "Repurchases of common stock") [3] #tN3" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">sec.gov/Archives/edgar… (Compensation Table) [3] secform4.com/insider-tradin…
beyond-mythos tweet mediabeyond-mythos tweet mediabeyond-mythos tweet media
English
3
3
62
9.3K
Chives
Chives@tehchives·
x.com/i/spaces/1gqxv… Make sure to check this out! 6days doing a great service for the broader investing community. Thanks John as well for hosting and Mitch for collaborating!
English
0
1
6
142
Chives
Chives@tehchives·
@jake2b Good thoughts! The voting record date will be around the same each year since AGMs must be within 13 months of the last AGM. I want to add that recalling shares allows investors to vote, but won't ensure their vote is counted. Overvoting is a known issue in the US markets.
English
0
0
3
216
jake2b
jake2b@jake2b·
initially I stated that there are three factors that align in June which make it ripe for $GME, but I realize there is a fourth. by making the record date for voting at the annual meeting immediately after April OPEX (this year it was April 21), anyone that is loaning out shares for shorting who would want to vote, will either recall or no longer loan out their shares. when you lend out shares through a share lending program, you transfer voting rights to the borrower and so to vote at a company's annual meeting, you need to recall your shares from the lending program before the record date set by the company, as only shareholders of record on that date can vote.
jake2b@jake2b

I wonder if $GME has not yet announced their $BTC acquisition because they have a precise strategy for supply and demand of their notes. one data point that stands out to me last spring for $GME is the end of May and I think it will be worth watching this year again for the same reason. from Friday May 24 to Tuesday May 28 2024, the price of GameStop went from a low of 17.70$ to a high of 26.66$, a 51% difference from one trading day to the next. it was also accompanied by 105 million volume and I believe the reason for it was forced settlement due to April OPEX. it turns out that Tuesday May 28 was exactly T+3 and C+35 from April 18. notably, DFV was not posting during this week and returned with the reverse uno on June 2—I believe, communicating the change from buying pressure to market settlement dynamics that would be impacting the price action for $GME. it also served as a data point that confirmed what was coming. — it is not chance that GameStop does really well raising capital in June. in 2021, raising 1 billion and in 2024, raising another 2.137 billion. I believe it is a combination of three factors: • the juggling of the April OPEX fails; • ETF rebalancing upcoming; • the uncertainty of price reaction to Q1 earnings. the third piece plays a critical role and I believe explains with RC and Co. are waiting to announce their Bitcoin acquisition. from the data, it appears that no one last year wanted to wait and risk going to get their $GME shares for rebalancing after the Q1 earnings and so we saw a lot of volatility within the first week, at the end of which $GME successfully did their ATM. this year, despite the Convertible Notes providing locates in the near-term we do not see a reduction in fails. again, the Notes Offering is absolute confirmation in my opinion that RC and the Board have an excellent understanding of the market patterns surrounding their common stock. GME 2024— 1,337,167 GME 2025— 1,096,015 an 18% decrease; XRT 2024— 3,747,838 XRT 2025— 5,440,337 a 45% increase! despite the Notes, the fails are through the roof and that's very encouraging. what stands out to me and how I believe the Board knows what is going on is that the Notes were offered exactly on the day that is T+3, C+35 from February 21. February 21 recorded 1.14 million fails for $XRT (!!) and by announcing the Notes a few days prior, RC and Co. created a huge demand for their Offering and ensured that they would be able to raise as much money as they wanted. brilliant. by not yet having disclosed a Bitcoin purchase, RC has created a dynamic where no one will be willing to risk not getting their real GME shares for $XRT ETF rebalancing before earnings, because of the uncertainty around Q1 with 6.2 billion dollars on the balance sheet and what if.. the Bitcoin purchase is disclosed at that time? the real risk exists that the share price may be much higher compared to a week earlier. this concentrated window of time combined with anticipated extreme demand at the same time could create a lot of unexpected volatility. it would also be a perfect moment for the GME Board to offer a second Convertible Note Offering, (they love June for raising money) at a time of elevated price and volume. they could demand higher conversion prices, securing even more money for the balance sheet now, for conversion-eligible dilution much later. this is not letting shorts off the hook, in fact it could not be more opposite! it is project rocket: more money now, more Bitcoin, further price appreciation. when supply and demand are in your favour, you decide the price—remember the water bottle example from a previous post? issuing Notes is the path to turn shorts into buyers. when they are not short, there is no ongoing incentive to continue juggling ETF fails. that will be the moment when GameStop will begin to be fairly priced by the market. if not, then the Bitcoin will. that is why it was named project rocket.

English
10
47
411
33.2K
Chives retweetledi
WhyDRS
WhyDRS@whydrs·
Today on Taking Stock we're diving deep into Donations: how we're set up to collect funds, where those funds are being held, plans to improve disclosure, and plans for the DUNA governance structure we'll be using in order to facilitate use of those funds. x.com/i/spaces/1rmxP…
English
0
1
7
207
Chives retweetledi
john.xlm
john.xlm@JFWooten4·
New bill ensures your "right to self-custody" by outlining a new framework for custodianship escheatment? 🙄 "THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA REQUIRES US TO NOTIFY YOU THAT YOUR UNCLAIMED PROPERTY MAY BE TRANSFERRED TO THE STATE IF YOU DO NOT CONTACT US... including the need to file a claim in order for the owner’s property to be returned to the owner. The notice required by this section shall, in boldface type or in a font a minimum of two points larger than the rest of the notice... The holder may impose a service charge on the deposit, account, shares, or other interest for this notice in an amount not to exceed the administrative cost of mailing or electronically sending the notice and form, and in no case to exceed two dollars ($2)." Want private keys subject to State regulators? Chat tonight @xximpod
Satoshi Action Fund@SatoshiActFund

We are proud to officially announce that ‘Bitcoin Rights’ has been introduced in the California Assembly by the Chair of Banking and Finance - Assemblyman Valencia. Once passed, nearly 40 million Americans will have their right to self-custody protected! The bill also creates legal frameworks for how to manage ‘unclaimed property’ for digital assets which we fully endorse. Thank you to Chair of Banking and Finance @AsmValencia for including this language in AB-1052 and your leadership. Special thanks to @IanCalderon for helping to make this a reality.

English
1
1
4
359
Chives retweetledi
Mags
Mags@magsonthemoon·
Hey $BTC homies, did you know $GME investors have been self-custodying their shares, removing them from shifty brokerages who may loan them out to shorts, and instead hodling in our own names? This is analogous to hodling crypto in your own wallet vs. an exchange. Wanna learn more? You can read about it at whyDRS.org 🏴‍☠️
6days1week@6days1week

Everyone needs to see this. #GME has more DRS / registered holders than all magnificent 7 stocks combined. Shout out to @lawsondt for consolidating the data. (1/2)

English
10
49
330
14.6K
Chives retweetledi
XXIM Podcast
XXIM Podcast@xximpod·
Our DAO Governance Call Summary: We hosted a space call to explore the intricate landscape of DAO governance with an impressive panel from a rich mix of DAOs and the first DUNA. @LauraMinquini @danimimm @katbu00 @tehchives @KaspaDAO, and @melnykowycz The discussion kicked off with a dose of pragmatism. Governance: A Moving Target. @danimimm Danny (from Blockfull.io) argued there’s no golden governance template—DAOs adapt to their communities. Some, like Balancer DAO, use soft governance via Snapshot, while others start centralized and decentralize over time. She flagged a “chicken-and-egg” issue: communities need structure, but newbies often lack the chops to define it upfront. The takeaway? Flexibility is key—listen first, then build. @LauraMinquini from @athena_DAO_ dropped a truth bomb: “DAO governance is a pie dream.” She argued that beneath the decentralized hype, tokenomics often turn DAOs into plutocracies—power skews to those with the most tokens. Citing examples of founders grabbing 20% allocations, she challenged the room to show her a truly democratic DAO. “We’re just tokenizing old problems,” she said, a view echoed by others who noted that big airdrops or deep pockets still call the shots. It’s a stark reality check for the decentralization faithful. @KaspaDAO lead by @Julez_krc20 mentioned that they are building an Ecosystem, One Proposal at a Time brought a practical lens, spotlighting their mission as the first DAO on the @KaspaCurrency blockchain: fund projects to grow the ecosystem, walked us through a standout proposal—a travel agency built on Kaspa, with transactions feeding the “K.Treasury” and sustaining it for three years post-repayment. They rely on Discord, Telegram, and X to keep members in the loop. @tehchivesfrom @whydrs The Duna Experiment: Governance with Purpose Chives from WHYDRS.org offered a fresh twist with the “Duna”—a Decentralized Unincorporated Nonprofit Association out of Wyoming. Here, membership is as simple as saying “I’m in,” but voting power comes from contributions the community values, like writing a helpful article. Unlike profit-driven DAOs, Duna tokens don’t trade for cash, aligning governance with mission over money. Chives admitted it’s subjective and a work in progress, but the aim is clear: empower the most engaged to steer the ship. Could this be a blueprint for DAOs chasing impact over income? The Big Challenges with DAOs today: Engagement and Clarity emphasized iteration to boost engagement, but it’s clear this nut’s still uncracked. Two hurdles loomed large. First, informational asymmetry and Second, participation: low turnout plagues many DAOs, with 4-5% often the norm even in delegated setups. Community Voices and Closing Thoughts The call left us with no clear answers but plenty to chew on: DAOs are a messy, evolving experiment. From Danny’s adaptability to Laura’s skepticism, Kaspa DAO’s ambition, and Chives’ nonprofit pivot, it’s clear governance hinges on purpose—be it profit, impact, or somewhere in between. What’s next? We’d love your take—drop us a line with feedback or join us for round two. The decentralized journey’s just getting started.
XXIM Podcast@xximpod

twitter.com/i/spaces/1djGX…

English
0
2
15
611
Chives retweetledi
WhyDRS
WhyDRS@whydrs·
Custody is such a crucial part of investing, and doesn't get as much attention as it deserves. DOLE is one example where investors holding through a broker without direct custodial claim had worse outcome as a result. Source: klgatesdelawaredocket.com/wp-content/upl…
WhyDRS tweet media
English
0
8
20
3.2K
Chives retweetledi
XXIM Podcast
XXIM Podcast@xximpod·
$KAS community, we are hosting “The Great Panel” Discussion Monday to Discuss DAO Governance with some of our favourite founders running DAOs and more coming! Please nominate your Favourite DAO in case we missed anyone. Date and Time: 31st of March 2pm GMT Guests: @LauraMinquini (@athena_DAO_) @katbu00 (@microbiomedao) Julez (@KaspaDAO) @tehchives (@whydrs) Agenda: 1. Introductions 2. Let’s start with the structure of the DAO’s 3. Proposals submission process 4. How do people submit community ideas / how do ideas become proposals ? 5. Voting for the proposals - what is the quorum for the voting / decision making 6. Ways you inform community 7. Determining the minimum votes needed for DAO decisions and how do you encouraging member participation. 8. Voting power - is it based simply on number of tokens or is it more complex system based on some reputation systems to maintain fairness for all members 9. Have you had any issues around vote manipulation? and how do you ensure trustworthy results in DAO governance. Ps - We’d love to see you too! @ClariceDAiello + @geoffanders @vitadao @HairDAO_ @melnykowycz
XXIM Podcast tweet media
English
2
14
79
2.8K
Chives retweetledi
john.xlm
john.xlm@JFWooten4·
Thanks to @tehchives, @yuvalbenrobd, and @xximpod for the notices to mention @blocktransfer's #TAD3 work here. Short answer: this is what we've been working on for years since the original sneeze: wooten.link/explainer As I understand it, we're the only SEC-registered TA offering issuer-level blockchain accounting with securities directly held in noncustodial wallets.
English
0
3
5
547
Chives
Chives@tehchives·
@yuvalbenrobd @mcuban @JFWooten4 @JamesNDaGiantJB I think John is a force without any support staff - but agreed with the rest! It's a fascinating protocol that I think deserves more attention in the discussion around market reform and possible alternatives.
English
1
0
0
43
Chives
Chives@tehchives·
@almaadeed @SpaceX Not tokenization but: Check out blocktransfer.com - It's a transfer agent using blockchain to track ownership, which materially shifts how market access is provided thanks to decentralized order books. This can provide both custody and liquidity to investors.
English
0
0
1
53
SultanAlmaadeed.com
SultanAlmaadeed.com@Almaadeed·
Who Can Tokenize $GME Stocks and make it accessible to Global Investors? #gme . Imagine you increase the availability to billions of people around the world 🌎 then we could see Tokenized @SpaceX and $tsla
English
440
558
3.4K
249.5K
XXIM Podcast
XXIM Podcast@xximpod·
Spaces ‼️ We’ll be discussing with John Wooten A. What are transfer agents. B. Why transfer agents are the backbone for stock custody. C. What is blockchain based transfer agent What is TAD3. D. Architecture and Sec patent TAD3 twitter.com/i/spaces/1PlKQ…
English
3
1
6
334
Chives
Chives@tehchives·
@xximpod This is going to be a good one! Thanks Ankit for the ping!
English
1
0
3
22
XXIM Podcast
XXIM Podcast@xximpod·
@tehchives a topic near and dear to you. I know very late for you :) but please do share this with the DRS community
English
1
0
2
127