tejuuu

We know today's unfortunate technical disruption caused distress for some CUET (UG) 2026 candidates. Candidates who did their Biometric Registration and were present at their examination centres today (i.e. 30.05.2026 in Shift-I), but couldn't complete their examination due to this technical glitch, will get an opportunity for examination. Details will follow shortly on cuet.nta.ac.in

#WATCH | Ranchi, Jharkhand | A class 12th student, Sarthak Sidhant, says, “…I have written a blog that compares the tender documents of CBSE. I have uploaded and published it… There were at least 15 discrepancies, as per my blog. I would like to highlight three or four of them. Let me give a background about Coempt. It was known as Globarena, and they have a very shady background. 23 students killed themselves because of coempt… Now, I would like to tell you about RFP (Request for Proposal). What happens is the government issues a tender and asks the bidder to bid for it. CBSE issued this tender three times… I have compared the old RFP and the new RFP, and I found some discrepancies… The first discrepancy is that there were three clauses of poor performances which was completely wiped out from the new RFP. In the earlier RFP, there was a clause called blacklisted earlier, whereas in the new RFP, it was changed to blacklisted currently. Why would the board want a service provider which was blacklisted earlier? The third thing I found out is the 50 crore limit, which you needed to qualify, and coempt qualified that by 1.7% … The time frame of corrupt practices was halved, and there were project criteria changes… It shows a pattern that the industry giant TCS was not preferred, but coempt was preferred, which works as a very fragmented group of institutions…”

#WATCH | Ranchi, Jharkhand | A class 12th student, Sarthak Sidhant, says, “…I have written a blog that compares the tender documents of CBSE. I have uploaded and published it… There were at least 15 discrepancies, as per my blog. I would like to highlight three or four of them. Let me give a background about Coempt. It was known as Globarena, and they have a very shady background. 23 students killed themselves because of coempt… Now, I would like to tell you about RFP (Request for Proposal). What happens is the government issues a tender and asks the bidder to bid for it. CBSE issued this tender three times… I have compared the old RFP and the new RFP, and I found some discrepancies… The first discrepancy is that there were three clauses of poor performances which was completely wiped out from the new RFP. In the earlier RFP, there was a clause called blacklisted earlier, whereas in the new RFP, it was changed to blacklisted currently. Why would the board want a service provider which was blacklisted earlier? The third thing I found out is the 50 crore limit, which you needed to qualify, and coempt qualified that by 1.7% … The time frame of corrupt practices was halved, and there were project criteria changes… It shows a pattern that the industry giant TCS was not preferred, but coempt was preferred, which works as a very fragmented group of institutions…”

देश भर में सीबीएसई के ओएसएम (OSM) मुद्दे को लेकर विवाद गहराता जा रहा है। इसी बीच, 12वीं कक्षा कर चुके युवा सार्थक सिद्धांत की एक इनवेस्टिगेटिव रिपोर्ट ने सीबीएसई की टेंडरिंग प्रक्रिया पर गंभीर सवाल खड़े कर दिए हैं। रिपोर्ट के अनुसार, सीबीएसई ने कथित तौर पर टेंडर की शर्तों में ऐसे बदलाव किए, जिनसे Coempt Edutech को लाभ पहुंचा। आरोप है कि एंट्री बैरियर से जुड़े कई महत्वपूर्ण मानकों में संशोधन कर कंपनी के लिए रास्ता आसान बनाया गया। सार्थक सिद्धांत की इस रिपोर्ट को विपक्ष के कई नेता सोशल मीडिया पर साझा कर रहे हैं और सीबीएसई की कार्यप्रणाली तथा टेंडर आवंटन प्रक्रिया की पारदर्शिता पर सवाल उठा रहे हैं। देखिए संवाददाता अनमोल बाली के साथ सार्थक सिद्धांत की पूरी बातचीत #CBSE #OSMControversy #CBSETender #EducationNews #SarthakSiddhant #InvestigativeReport #CoemptEdutech | @AnmolBali9