Termsheetinator

More Cold-Emails, More Sales: ↓ infrasuite.io 1. Inquire on site 2. Speak with our team 3. Done-for-you setup 4. Slack support

TL;DR: First, make the prospect quantify: 1. Where they want to be. 2. Where they are now. 3. The measurable gap. 4. What that gap costs every month or quarter. 5. Why doing nothing is riskier than changing. 6. Why your fee is small compared with the ongoing loss. Then control every step after the call: 1. Run diligence like an audit. 2. Book the next meeting before ending the current one. 3. Send a follow-up immediately. 4. Deliver the first scope within 24 hours. 5. Require feedback before the review call. 6. Revise until your contact can defend the scope internally. 7. Send the agreement immediately after approval. 8. Send the invoice with the agreement or immediately after signing.

Deep dive: x.com/termsheetinato…

More Cold-Emails, More Sales: ↓ infrasuite.io 1. Inquire on site 2. Speak with our team 3. Done-for-you setup 4. Slack support

IF YOU’RE SELLING B2B, AI IMPLEMENTATIONS, GTM, CONSULTING - DOESN'T MATTER. BOOKMARK THESE 15 PARTS: Most people think closing larger deals comes down to objection handling, better proposals or becoming more persuasive on the final call. IT DOES NOT! You close larger deals by controlling two things: The economic gap inside the prospect’s business. The momentum between every step of the sales process. The first one creates the reason to buy. The second one prevents that reason from disappearing. You can build an incredible case for why the prospect needs to change, but if you disappear for four days after diligence, send a generic proposal and walk into the review call without feedback, you will still lose. You can also run the most organized follow-up process in the world, but if the prospect never understood what their current situation was costing them, there will be no urgency underneath it. You need both. You need to build the case like a lawyer and then run the process like an operator. That is how $25K–$75K deals get closed. Not by “checking in.” Not by asking whether they had a chance to review. Not by presenting 48 slides about your company. You establish the desired outcome. You expose the current reality. You calculate the gap. You make the cost of doing nothing visible. You build the scope directly around that gap. Then you force continuous micro-commitments until the engagement is signed and paid. That is the entire system. - STEP ONE: MAKE THE STATUS QUO MORE EXPENSIVE THAN CHANGE. Loss aversion is one of the most important concepts in B2B sales. People do not automatically buy because the future could be better. They buy when they understand that remaining where they are is already costing them more than changing. A $50K engagement can be viewed in two completely different ways. It can be viewed as: “We have to spend PART.” Or it can be viewed as: “We are currently losing $90K every quarter, and this $50K investment gives us a credible path to stop it.” Same price. Completely different decision. Your job is not to manipulate the prospect into feeling pain. Your job is to help them accurately calculate a cost that already exists but has never been organized clearly. Most prospects know something is wrong. They feel the problem. They complain about the problem. They may have been dealing with the problem for a year. But vague discomfort does not create urgency. Specific gaps create urgency. Math creates urgency. Their own words create urgency. You need to convert: “We need more pipeline.” Into: “We need 40 qualified meetings every month. We currently generate 14. The gap is 26 meetings per month, and it has existed for six months.” Now there is something to solve. You are no longer selling “more pipeline.” You are helping them close a measurable commercial gap. Here is how you do it. PART ONE: ESTABLISH THE DESIRED STATE. Do not begin discovery by digging around randomly for pain. Start by establishing the prospect’s reference point. What are they trying to accomplish? What number are they responsible for? What does success look like over the next 90 days? Ask: “Where does the company need to be by the end of this quarter?” “What number are you personally responsible for?” “What does a successful next 90 days look like?” “What needs to happen for leadership to consider this solved?” You need the prospect to define the destination before you begin calculating the distance. Their goal becomes the anchor for the entire conversation. Not your pitch. Not your case study. Not your ROI calculator. Their stated target. Once they say they need 40 meetings per month, $500K in additional pipeline, a 20% increase in production capacity or a shorter sales cycle, that goal becomes the standard against which the current system gets judged. - PART 2: ESTABLISH CURRENT REALITY. Once the target is clear, you need the truth about where they currently are. Not the polished version they put into board presentations. The operating reality. Ask: “Where are you today?” “What is the current monthly pace?” “What are you currently doing to reach the target?” “What parts of the system are working?” “What parts are clearly no longer working?” “What have you accepted as normal that probably should not be normal?” That last question is where things begin opening up. Companies normalize dysfunction constantly. They normalize eight-week sales cycles. They normalize leads sitting untouched for three days. They normalize account executives doing their own prospecting. They normalize agencies missing reporting deadlines. They normalize thousands of records sitting inside a CRM without any usable contact data. They normalize founders still being involved in every sale. The problem has existed for so long that nobody sees it as a problem anymore. It has simply become “how things work here.” Your job is to make the invisible cost visible. But do not attack what they built. People are emotionally attached to their existing systems, teams, vendors and internal decisions. Even when those systems are underperforming, they are still theirs. Respect the current system first. Say: “Candidly, it makes sense why you built it this way. It probably worked for the stage the company was in.” Then ask: “Is the same system still strong enough for where you’re trying to go next?” You are not calling their baby ugly. You are showing them that the system designed for the old stage may not support the next one. PART 3: CALCULATE THE GAP. Now put the desired state and current reality beside each other. Do not exaggerate. Do not use words like “massive,” “critical” or “game-changing.” Sophisticated buyers are not persuaded by adjectives. They are persuaded by specific numbers they already agreed were accurate. Say: “You said the target is 40 qualified meetings per month. You are currently averaging 14. So the current gap is 26 meetings every month. Is that accurate?” Then stop talking. Let them confirm it. Once they confirm the number, continue: “What has prevented the team from closing that gap?” “What have you already tried?” “Why did those attempts fail?” “What would need to change operationally for the gap to close?” Now the problem is no longer your opinion. It is their target. Their current performance. Their shortfall. Their math. That is why this works. You are not convincing them that they have a problem. You are helping them organize what they already admitted. - PART 4: MAKE THE COST OF INACTION VISIBLE. This is the part most salespeople skip. They identify a problem and immediately start pitching. Wrong. The prospect may agree that a gap exists and still do absolutely nothing about it. Companies operate with known problems all the time. Before presenting your solution, you need to understand what happens if the gap remains open. Ask: “What happens if this remains the same for another quarter?” “What does that shortfall affect downstream?” “What does it cost in missed revenue?” “What does it cost in wasted labour or management time?” “What happens to the annual target if the current pace continues?” “What becomes harder if this gets pushed another six months?” “What does this affect for you personally?” Now the prospect stops comparing: Buy versus do not buy. They start comparing: The cost of changing versus the cost of continuing down the current path. That is the real B2B decision. They are rarely deciding between spending money and saving money. They are choosing between two costs. The cost of action. Or the cost of inaction. Your job is to calculate both honestly. - PART 5: REFRAME THE RISK. A prospect who is hesitant to buy is not necessarily risk-averse. They may simply be focused on the wrong risk. They see changing vendors as risky. They see implementing a new process as risky. They see paying you as risky. What they may not see is the risk of leaving the current system untouched for another 90 days. Ask: “I understand why changing the process feels risky. What I’m trying to understand is, what is the risk of keeping this exactly as it is for another quarter?” Then shut up. Do not answer the question for them. You are not manufacturing risk. You are surfacing the risk already contained inside the status quo. You can rotate the frame several ways without repeating the same pitch. Risk frame: “What is riskier right now: changing the system or keeping the current one for another 90 days?” Goal frame: “You said the target is 40 meetings. The current system produces 14. What has to change for the target to remain realistic?” Cost frame: “What does the current process cost in missed revenue, wasted labour and delayed execution?” Identity frame: “Does this operating system match the company you are trying to become?” Timing frame: “Is this something that needs to change now, or is leadership comfortable carrying the gap into another quarter?” The prospect already understands the potential upside. The missing ingredient is usually contrast. They do not yet feel enough distance between where they are and where they said they need to be. - PART 6: CONNECT PRICE TO THE GAP. Price resistance is usually not a pricing problem. It is a gap problem. The buyer either does not believe the unresolved problem is expensive enough, or they do not believe your solution can close enough of the gap to justify the investment. A $50K price presented by itself feels like a $50K loss. A $50K investment measured against a credible $90K quarterly loss feels completely different. You are not hiding the price. You are giving the price economic context. Say: “My question is whether this problem is expensive enough to solve now. Based on what you told me, the current gap is costing approximately X. If that number is accurate, this investment only makes sense if we believe the engagement can close enough of that gap to justify it.” That is how an advisor discusses price. No pressure. No fake scarcity. No nervous discounting. No 20-minute defence of your deliverables. Just math. The prospect should not feel like they are being convinced to spend money. They should feel like they are deciding whether the existing loss is worth preventing. This is why the best closers are closer to lawyers than hype men. They build the case. They establish the desired outcome. They document current reality. They calculate the gap. They show the consequences of leaving it unresolved. Then they present the solution as the most credible path to close it. - STEP TWO: DO NOT DESTROY THE CASE AFTER THE CALL. You can execute everything above perfectly and still lose the deal because of what you do immediately after diligence. This is where agencies and consultants bleed out constantly. You run a strong call. The prospect gives you information they would never give an ordinary vendor. You understand their commercial system, internal politics, financial constraints and approval process. They are engaged. They are thinking about the problem. The emotional temperature is high. Then the call ends and you say: “Great, I’ll put something together and send it over.” You disappear for four days. The prospect returns to 700 other priorities. Their internal urgency disappears. The context becomes stale. You finally send a generic PDF on Friday afternoon and ask them to “let you know their thoughts.” Then you walk into the next call with no feedback, no edits, no internal objections and no idea what happened after your original conversation. You gave yourself nothing to work with. So you begin selling again. And once you start pitching for 30 minutes on the review call, the deal is already moving backwards. The review call is not where you present version one. The review call is where you discuss version two or version three because feedback and revisions have already started. Momentum is the currency of a multi-week B2B sales cycle. This is how you protect it. - PART 7 RUN DILIGENCE LIKE AN AUDIT. Before writing anything, extract the entire commercial system. You need to understand: Top-of-funnel inputs. Middle-of-funnel mechanics. Bottom-of-funnel conversion. Average contract value. Customer lifetime value. Sales-cycle length. Current volume. Conversion rates. Team structure. Who qualifies opportunities. Who sells. Who manages implementation. What finance cares about. What leadership pushes back on. Who can approve the engagement. Who can quietly kill it. What has gotten similar projects approved before. What previous vendors promised. Why those engagements failed. What messaging leadership hates. What internal language they use. What channels currently produce. What the gaps are. Why they agreed to speak with you now. You are not writing a scope from imagination. You are building it from transcript data. Every section should connect to something the prospect told you. Every deliverable should solve a documented constraint. Every number should come from their operating reality. Every risk should be mitigated before leadership has a chance to identify it. That is how you create a scope an internal champion can defend when you are not in the room. - PART 8: END THE DILIGENCE CALL CORRECTLY. Never end a serious diligence call with: “I’ll send something over.” That sentence creates ambiguity. Before anyone leaves the call, schedule the scope-review meeting. Put it four or five days out. That window is intentional. You need enough time to send the first scope, collect feedback, revise it and generate two or three meaningful touches before the next live conversation. Then ask the internal approval questions: “Before I let you go, what does leadership normally react to when reviewing something like this?” “What has gotten a similar engagement approved in the past?” “What does finance normally push back on?” “Who else will need to believe this makes sense?” “What will they need to see to defend the investment?” “What could quietly kill this internally?” Do not assume that because your contact likes the idea, the company will buy. Your contact needs to sell the engagement internally. Your scope needs to equip them to do that. Once the review call is booked, close the conversation by setting explicit expectations: “I’ll send a continuity email immediately after this call. You’ll have the first version of the scope within 24 hours. Between now and our review, I’ll need your first wave of feedback so I can arrive with revisions already in motion.” Now everybody knows what happens next. No ambiguity. No drifting. No “circling back next week.” - PART 9: SEND THE CONTINUITY EMAIL IMMEDIATELY. Not later that evening. Not tomorrow morning. Immediately. This should already exist as a template. Create a dedicated operations inbox such as: Emily@yourcompany.com Or: Operations@yourcompany.com Use it consistently for scopes, scheduling, case studies, agreements and feedback reminders. It separates advisory conversations from process management and makes the engagement feel organized. The email should say: “Great speaking today, Prospect. I’ve included Emily from our operations team on this thread. You’ll receive the first version of the scope tomorrow. Before the review call, we’ll need your initial feedback so YOURNAME can arrive with revisions already underway. We’ll take it from here.” That email tells them the process has begun. It maintains the emotional continuity from the call. It also creates a clear expectation that they have work to do before the next meeting. Stop acting like requesting feedback is inconveniencing the prospect. They want structure. They want clarity. They want somebody to quarterback the engagement. - PART 10: SEND THE FIRST SCOPE WITHIN 24 HOURS. Taking three to five days to prepare a scope is killing your deals. The prospect’s enthusiasm decays. The diligence becomes stale. Other priorities move in. Internal conversations happen without you. Then you have to recreate urgency that already existed four days earlier. Send the first version within 24 hours while the conversation is still alive. It does not need to be the final version. That is the point. The scope is supposed to enter a feedback process. Version one is where collaboration begins. The document should clearly contain: The desired outcome. The current state. The measurable gap. The cost of leaving the gap unresolved. The recommended strategy. The specific workstreams. The responsibilities on both sides. The timeline. The commercial terms. The risks and how they will be mitigated. The decision process. Do not send a menu of random services. Build the scope around the commercial problem they admitted they needed to solve. - PART 11: DEMAND THE FIRST WAVE OF FEEDBACK. Without feedback, you walk into the review call blind. When you are blind, you start selling. When you start selling, your advisory posture disappears. Tell the prospect directly: “This is the first working version. We need your initial reactions before the review call so we can begin revisions and use the meeting to discuss the updated scope rather than presenting the document from scratch.” This communicates that the process requires participation from both sides. They must dance with you. It takes two to tango. If they do not respond within 48 hours, the operations inbox follows up: “Prospect, your review call with YOURAME is scheduled for tomorrow and we have not yet received your feedback. We need to begin revisions before that conversation. Can we expect your notes today, or should we move the review back a few days?” That is not aggressive. That is process management. Stop treating prospects like fragile strangers. Treat them like internal stakeholders with responsibilities and deadlines. - PART 12: NO FEEDBACK MEANS NO NORMAL REVIEW CALL. Do not walk into a second call after diligence with zero feedback and pretend everything is fine. You already know what will happen. You will share your screen. You will explain the scope line by line. They will make vague noises. You will start defending the strategy. Then you will spend 30 minutes trying to resell a prospect who was already interested. If they did not provide feedback, the review call becomes a conversation about why they did not engage. Ask: “Before we go through the document, I noticed we didn’t receive any feedback. What prevented the team from reviewing it?” You need the truth. Maybe the opportunity is no longer important. Maybe your contact is not the real champion. Maybe leadership rejected the price. Maybe there is another vendor. Maybe an internal project took priority. Maybe they never distributed the scope. All news is good news, including bad news, because bad news gives you something real to solve. Ambiguity is what kills you. If they did provide feedback, the review call can be 10 minutes long. You are not presenting version one. You are walking through what changed. Say: “Based on your feedback, we revised these three areas. Does this version now give you enough to champion the engagement internally?” If they say yes, ask why. You need to understand what changed and what now feels defensible. If they say no, respond positively: “Great. Then we know we are not finished yet. Which section still needs the most work?” Then determine exactly who the revision is for. Does finance need stronger economics? Does the VP of Sales need a clearer connection to revenue? Does operations need more implementation detail? Does the CEO need more risk mitigation? Does legal need different terms? Every revision needs a reason and an audience. Do not edit blindly. - PART 13: REVISE UNTIL THE SCOPE CAN SURVIVE WITHOUT YOU. The goal is not for your contact to “like” the scope. The goal is for them to defend it when you are not in the room. Ask: “If you forwarded this version to the decision-makers today, what would they challenge?” “What question would finance ask first?” “Which part would leadership have difficulty believing?” “What would make this easier for you to champion internally?” Then revise again. You are not waiting for a giant commitment. You are collecting micro-commitments. Review the scope. Send feedback. Approve the economic case. Confirm the strategy. Share it internally. Bring in the decision-maker. Approve the final version. Review the agreement. Sign the agreement. Pay the invoice. Large deals are simply sequences of small commitments managed properly. - PART 14: ONCE THE SCOPE IS APPROVED, SEND THE ENGAGEMENT LETTER. Do not ask: “What would you like to do next?” You already know what happens next. Say: “Perfect. Emily will send the engagement letter based on the final scope. Send us your first thoughts immediately after reviewing it. If anything needs to be revised, we’ll begin those edits right away.” You do not ask permission to progress a deal that everybody has already agreed should progress. You maintain the sequence. You maintain the expectation. You keep the next micro-step moving. - PART 15: ONCE THE AGREEMENT IS APPROVED, SEND THE INVOICE IMMEDIATELY. Not tomorrow. Not after you finish another meeting. Not once you have cleaned up your payment system. Immediately. When the emotional window opens, capture it. Operators lose deals that were effectively closed because they allow unnecessary space between approval, signature and payment. Every delay creates another opportunity for distraction, doubt or internal friction. The process should feel continuous: Final scope approved. Engagement letter sent. Agreement signed. Invoice issued. Payment completed. Kickoff scheduled. No dead space. THIS IS THE COMPLETE B2B DEAL-CONTROL SYSTEM. You start with what the prospect wants. You establish where they are today. You calculate the measurable gap. You show what leaving the gap unresolved will cost. You reframe inaction as a real commercial risk. You position your investment against that cost. You conduct diligence like an audit. You schedule the next call before ending the current one. You send the continuity email immediately. You deliver the first scope within 24 hours. You demand feedback before the review. You revise until the scope can be defended internally. You send the agreement immediately after scope approval. You send the invoice immediately after agreement approval. That is how you create urgency without becoming manipulative. That is how you protect momentum without becoming annoying. That is how you operate like an advisor instead of a vendor. Most people do one side of this. They understand psychology but have no process. Or they have a process but never built an economic case strong enough to create urgency. You need both. Build the case like a lawyer. Control the process like an operator. Make the cost of staying the same impossible to ignore. Then remove every unnecessary pause between interest and payment. That is how you stop chasing $3K retainers and begin closing BIGGER and BETTER B2B engagements.

More Cold-Emails, More Sales: ↓ infrasuite.io 1. Inquire on site 2. Speak with our team 3. Done-for-you setup 4. Slack support

One of the strongest Proxy-Trigger-Providers for outreach is... Drumroll... CONTENT CREATORS Every day dozens of content creators ships lead magnet posts and other sorts of content into LinkedIn where YOUR BUYERS are liking, commenting and engaging. These are active profiles, commenting on give aways that signal they are likely qualified for your solutions. 1. Constantly monitor LinkedIn for creators who sell to your buyers 2. Add them to your monitoring list 3. Scrape their posts for people who engage in anyway 4. Send the list to a Open InMail detector - or pay a scraper to do it for you, push to LinkedIn campaigns to send Open InMails to them. 5. The ones who are NOT open profiles (the majority), push those contacts into Connection Request campaigns, these are FREE DM's once they accept the request. 6. Take the ENTIRE list and enrich for emails to launch cold-email campaigns with InfraSuite mailboxes... Enrich for emails via API (Blitz, GetLeads, QuickEnrich, AI-Ark, etc..) Or even a cheap Apollo scraper. 7. Enrich for phone numbers from FullEnrich or GetLeads 8. Connection Requests, Open InMails, Emails, Dials, Hit them from all angles. You need to love the game, get nerdy, burn tokens, scrape, enrich, write, repeat, if this process is a burden then you need to find a marketing channel you enjoy executing on every day. Cloud agents trained on a slim .md + cron job schedule can do a lot of day to day work that sets you up for success. You have to be willing to burn some tokens and cash, pay the skill debt and stop Spamming TAM's and saying cold-email/outbound is dead, it's not, you just don't love the game enough.

More Cold-Emails, More Sales: ↓ infrasuite.io 1. Inquire on site 2. Speak with our team 3. Done-for-you setup 4. Slack support

Ever day I grow closer launching a news or content themed media channel and/or theme/news pages on YouTube and IG for my companies. Distribution (media) is king. I'd argue that if you're building a new company, you should be starting from a non technical audience lives and work backwards to your product or service. Demand > Features Problems > Product Audience > Users

More Cold-Emails, More Sales: ↓ infrasuite.io 1. Inquire on site 2. Speak with our team 3. Done-for-you setup 4. Slack support

You should write cold call scripts for your offer, even if you have no intention of ever dialling. It'll force you to understand your offer(s) better than any other exercise, you'll write better emails and have better sales calls if you nail a call script for it. Then have some balls to actually dial and refine it with real feedback, worst case you finally see why you don't actually know your offer well enough and best case you book meetings and still get tons of feedback. Win win. Back when I started my first company, we rewrote the same cold script and one-call-close script 30+ times for one offer. So imagine how intimately we got to know that offer. Fun fact: The final/best versions were skeleton scripts with bullet points, not word for word scripts. Forces to know the offer better while staying on the linear path to closing.

More Mailboxes, More Cold-Emails, More Sales: ↓ infrasuite.io 1. Inquire on site 2. Speak with our team 3. Done-for-you setup 4. Slack support

Cold email is more effective when you are not selling cold email, the real value of learning outbound was not so you can become good at managing inboxes, writing sequences, or running campaigns for clients. The value was that you learned how to enter a market, identify who has money, understand what they want, get in front of them at scale, and create demand from nothing. That is a much bigger skill than the service most people attach it to, which is why you should be trying to speedmaxx your way out of selling cold email as quickly as possible and parlay those skills into an offer, product, asset, or distribution system that you actually own. The mistake is assuming that because most markets still cannot operate cold email Infra, write good outbound, manage data, or build campaigns themselves, that you should continue doing it forever. Their incompetence does not automatically make the model valuable enough to stay in. It only proves that you have learned how to understand and sell into markets faster than the people inside them, and that same advantage can be applied to much larger opportunities where you control the deliverable instead of renting out your time and being blamed for every part of the client’s sales process that happens after the meeting is booked. If you had a proprietary data provider, an exclusive source of data, a unique way of combining public records, a relationship with a platform, a signal that identifies intent before everyone else sees it, or simply a better path to finding the right people at the right time, you could own distribution for an entire category of businesses. You could own the flow of borrowers for mortgage brokers, distressed consumers for debt-relief companies, credit events for credit-repair firms, renewal and risk events for insurance agents, motivated sellers for auction companies, acquisition opportunities for business brokers, properties for investors, buyers for sellers, or sellers for buyers. That is where you want to be, because once you control the source of opportunity, everyone downstream becomes dependent on your ability to keep the pipeline moving. The broker needs the borrower. The auction company needs the seller. The lender needs the deal. The insurance agent needs the renewal event. The business broker needs the owner who may transact. The investor needs the property. The buyer needs inventory. The seller needs demand. None of them care nearly as much about the channel as they care about getting access to the opportunity before their competitors do. Thats what owning distribution actually means. It means you are no longer another vendor competing to perform a service. You control a valuable bottleneck or 1 of 1 channel inside the market. You know where the opportunity comes from, you know how to identify it, you know how to package it, and you know which businesses will pay for access to it. The market may have dozens or hundreds of brokers, agents, lenders, buyers, and service providers, but they are all competing for the same limited supply of qualified opportunities, which puts the person controlling that supply in a completely different position. That is the moral of the story. Do not spend the next 10 years becoming better at fulfilling cold email as a service just because the clients are still incapable of doing it themselves. Take the sales skills, the market knowledge, the infrastructure, and the ability to create demand, then point all of it at an offer you own or a subset of a market where you can control distribution. AI is probably the clearest version of this opportunity right now because the learning curve for the people selling and building it is moving much faster than the learning curve for the people buying it. You can learn how a specific AI workflow, agent, automation, or implementation works in a few months, while the businesses you sell to may remain years behind because they are busy operating companies, managing staff, dealing with customers, and trying to understand what any of this technology actually means for them. You do not need to become the best AI engineer in the world. You need to understand one valuable use case deeply enough to package it, sell it, and deliver it to a market that is nowhere close to figuring it out on its own. But even that is not the biggest version of the opportunity, because the strongest position is often not merely owning the service or the software. It is owning distribution inside a valuable subset of a market and becoming the person that the buyers inside that market depend on for access to opportunities they cannot reliably find themselves.

More Mailboxes, More Cold-Emails, More Sales: ↓ infrasuite.io 1. Inquire on site 2. Speak with our team 3. Done-for-you setup 4. Slack support

If I were in my 20s and starting from scratch today with zero track record, this is exactly what I would do to condense 2 years of into 2 months and make money as fast as possible. I would launch an AI implementation advisory. But I would not begin by obsessing over automations, agents, software or features. I would begin with distribution. First, I would find a technical co-founder who was willing to go all in with me. This would probably be the slowest and most careful decision I made. A co-founder relationship is a marriage. The wrong person can destroy the company, regardless of how good the opportunity is. I would own marketing/distribution an sales. They would own implementation / fulfillment. Then I would build the best VSL possible, but I would not use my talking head with stock footage, vague promises and screenshots of automations nobody understands. I would create the VSL by working with two real local businesses for free. I would walk into local businesses and say: “We run an AI media company that highlights local businesses. We would like to feature your company and build one useful automation for you completely free.” This gives me two things at once: A reason for the owner to speak with me and a real business where we can prove that our work produces results. I would interview the owner, learn how the business operates and identify one painful, repetitive problem that could be improved with AI. My technical co-founder would build the solution. A week or two later, we would return, interview the owner again and document what changed. -How much time did it save? -What work disappeared? -Did response times improve? -Did they make more money? -Did employees become more productive? Now I have everything I need for a serious VSL: 1. The problem. 2. The audit. 3. The implementation. 4. The customer interaction. 5. The finished product. 6. The measurable result. 7. The customer explaining the value in their own words. I would repeat this with a second business and use the strongest footage from both companies to build the main VSL for the website. Then I would cut the same footage into dozens of smaller assets: -Customer stories. -Before-and-after clips. -Industry-specific examples. -Objection-handling videos. -Implementation walkthroughs. -Nurturing assets for booked calls. -LinkedIn posts. - Cold email lead magnets. At that point, I would no longer be a random person claiming that AI can help businesses. I would have proof, content, a clear offer and a fulfillment partner. Then I would expand nationally using LinkedIn and cold email. -The cold email gets their attention. -The content builds familiarity. -The VSL explains the offer. -The case studies remove the risk. -The sales call diagnoses the problem. -The technical co-founder fulfills the work. That is the entire model. Do not spend your first six months hiding behind a laptop building things nobody has agreed to buy. Find one painful business problem. Solve it for two companies. Film everything. Turn the results into distribution. Then use that distribution to sell the same outcome repeatedly. And then use those sales skills to recruit more fulfilment capacity and build out a small sales force under me.

More Mailboxes, More Cold-Emails, More Sales: ↓ infrasuite.io 1. Inquire on site 2. Speak with our team 3. Done-for-you setup 4. Slack support

There's so much more roi in research then spamming and guessing what to say and who to say it to. We have access to so many API's and unified API gateways that can constantly feed your marketing efforts. Surveys, news, polls, datasets, compliance changes, and 5000 other endpoints you can plug Claude into, build a few skills around, cron job it based on your offers and have it constantly feed your GTM tools so it knows where to look, what to say, who to target and everything else in between. You're probably 2-3 years behind what actual human biases are today, you likely have no idea how much money is out there and much more of a fit other ICP's and verticals are for your services. You're a few hours of wiring up and researching shy from 10x'ing your outputs with the same inputs.

More Cold-Emails, More Audits: ↓ infrasuite.io 1. Inquire on site 2. Speak with our team 3. Done-for-you setup 4. Slack support

If you’re selling paid AI audits that ascend into a build-out, you should be cold-emailmaxxing with AI. If you charge 1K for an audit, you can earn back your budget with a single closed-won. Monthly funnel with 22 sending days. 107,800 emails sent: -107,800 × 1.5% = 1,617 replies -1,617 × 20% = 323 positive replies -323.4 × 30% = 97 meetings booked -97.02 × 70% = 67 meetings attended -67.91 × 70% = 47 qualified opportunities -47.54 × 25% = 11 clients closed per month There are hundreds of thousands of cash-flowing Main Street and SMBs ready for your offer. How to reach 4,900 of them every day. 1. Build the infrastructure You do not need some complicated agency tech stack: Data: QuickEnrich = $99/month + Google Maps Scraper = $30/mo Claude: Pro + API usage = roughly $70/month Mailboxes: InfraSuite = 990 Microsoft 365 mailboxes for $799/month Sending: PlusVibe Business = $64.20/month Total cost: $1,062.20/month. One closed audit and the month is paid for. 2. Claude list building You give Claude access to the tools above and it will literally build the lists for you. Your TAM is massive, but that does not mean you should dump 50,000 random businesses into one campaign. Outbound is the art of connecting the right offer to the right list. Do not send one campaign to “small businesses.” Create separate lists for: -Dental groups -Accounting firms -Property managers -Insurance agencies -HVAC companies -Law firms -Staffing companies -Logistics companies -Multi-location franchises -Home-service businesses Then go another level deeper. Scrape copy variables through Claude and OpenAI 4.1nano API: -What they sell -Who they sell to -Likely repetitive processes A property manager should not receive the same pitch as an accounting firm. They have different employees, repetitive tasks, customers and financial consequences. 3. Use Claude to operate the machine Build Claude skills around the databases you use. You can create separate list-building skills for Sales Navigator, Apollo, AI-Ark, Google Maps and niche directories. The skill should: -Apply your targeting filters -Export the companies -Scrape their websites -Find the relevant variables -Locate the decision-makers -Verify emails through Reoon or OmniVerifier -Divide the leads into separate campaigns -Import everything into your sending platform Run it through a CLI so Claude handles the repetitive clicking instead of you spending the entire day inside different tools. For Google Maps lists, filter for companies with multiple locations, larger teams or other signals that suggest they can afford a serious implementation. A 5-person local shop and a 20-location operator should not be treated as the same buyer. 4. Sell the audit through the outcome Do not lead with: We provide AI automation services. Nobody knows what that means. Sell the time, money or capacity trapped inside a repetitive process. Here is the copy: - {{firstName}}, we helped 3 other {{similar_company_profiles}} move {{likely_repetitive_tasks}} into automation, giving their teams more than 12 hours a week back. I can show you what this could look like for {{company_name}} - no contracts or retainers. We'll remove one repetitive task that takes longer than it should through our [Unique Mechanism]. Can I give the office line a ring and give you more info? - This copy is just 1 variant, write 30+ variants and test which angles work best. Claude will spintax the copy for you as well, or just write a lot of variants to mimick spintaxing and deploy smaller lists per campaign. - The paid audit diagnoses where time and money are being lost. The build-out fixes it. You are not trying to convince every business to buy some giant AI transformation project. You are finding one painful process, proving the economic value of fixing it and ascending into the implementation. 5. Segment before you scale There are two ways to send 50,000 emails. Strategy A: Put all 50,000 contacts into one campaign with one offer, get terrible results and announce that cold email is dead. Strategy B: Divide those contacts into segmented campaigns based on industry, company profile, repetitive process and likely use case. Same number of contacts. Completely different result. Every lead should earn its row in the CSV. - You could even start locally which would work better and make your CTA "Can I stop by the office tomorrow and get you more info?"

More Mailboxes, More Cold-Emails, More Sales: ↓ infrasuite.io 1. Inquire on site 2. Speak with our team 3. Done-for-you setup 4. Slack support

The worst business to build when you’re new is one where nobody understands what you sell because you created a new "AI workflow" that no one understands. No competition sounds exciting until you realize you CAN'T SELL until you teach buyers what the product is, why they need it, how it works, how it fits into what they already do, and why they should trust you enough to try it. That means you spend most of the sales process educating instead of selling. Before the buyer can decide whether they want your solution, they first have to understand the category itself. Now compare that to a crowded market where people already buy the solution. They know the problem, understand the product, already have budget, and may already be paying someone else for it. You do not have to create demand from scratch. You only have to give them a reason to choose you or switch providers. Then once you enter that market, follow the framework in the tweet below. Do not show up as another service provider selling the same deliverable. Show up as the person who understands the buyer’s problems better than anyone else, exposes what those problems are costing them, and positions your service as the way to remove EXISTING downside instead of OPTIONAL upside. AI UGC is a good example. Brands already understand that they need more ad creative, traditional UGC is expensive and slow, and winning ads burn out quickly since they don't create enough TOF ads and then exhaust all the buyers in their immediate TAM. They know AI can now produce realistic videos at a much lower cost. You do not need to spend the entire call explaining why brands need creative. You can focus on the problems they already have with their current process, such as slow production, high creator costs, weak hooks, limited testing volume, inconsistent quality, and creatives that stop performing after a few weeks. Your job is to understand those problems better than the other AI UGC providers and build an offer that solves them. PROBLEM-SOLVER, NOT SERVICE-PROVIDER. This is why competition is INCREDIBLE when you are new. Your competitors have already educated the market, proven that buyers will pay, and shown you what customers care about. You can enter the same market, find the problems buyers still have, and give them a better reason to choose you. Don't look for a market with no competition or new product idea that will takes A LOT of education in order to START SELLING. Look for a market where people already spend money, understand the solution, and are still unhappy with what they are getting.