Der Tery

@tomas_873 @FartyMcgoo @hayasaka_aryan More like 0.06%.

@FartyMcgoo @hayasaka_aryan Lets not chat shit and look at the stats, US federal funding on them accounts for 0.00001%. Most of it military aid these days, and its not like they just give them a check but supplies/equipment instead

Israel is the only developed country with a birth rate above replacement level, very curious

@catek72 @grupertlowe @RupertLowe10 If it was just the hair then all would be banned. It’s the face that should not be covered.

@grupertlowe @RupertLowe10 Why are you so obsessed with seeing women's hair?

Plenty of hysteria around Restore Britain's policy on banning the burqa. Misinformation is rife, and I want to officially correct the record. We'd ban the niqab too.

@Tu_Quoque_4_U @banksinvesting @MichaelAArouet Why on Earth did you block me?

@Tu_Quoque_4_U @banksinvesting @MichaelAArouet There is no way to guarantee any investment, but the cost to the commenter of making it is essentially negative. In other words, he would be investing money he otherwise wouldn’t have had.

This is unreal. Believe it or not, in London parents are trying to reduce their income because they are better off earning £99k than £144k. The UK is on track to replace Germany as Europe's champion of absurdities. How is this even possible?

@Tu_Quoque_4_U @banksinvesting @MichaelAArouet However much tax the government charge on the pension when it’s paid out, it will still be less than the above 100% rates the commenter was otherwise facing.

@tery_der @banksinvesting @MichaelAArouet They are still de facto arms of the government. There is no way to know what will be getting out of it long term. Massive risk

@Tu_Quoque_4_U @banksinvesting @MichaelAArouet Private or workplace pensions aren’t spent on retirees. They are solely for the benefit of the contributor.

@tery_der @banksinvesting @MichaelAArouet Giving away your income now so current retired people can consume it away is also a huge risk. No way to know if you will get to rob younger people the same way in the future It's a terrible dynamic that incentives one to hide their ambitions and ability

@danielstorey85 @RupertLowe10 It should be in English only.

@RupertLowe10 And if you go about six feet to the right of that sign, you will see it in English 👍

Ah there goes John Terry

@banksinvesting @MichaelAArouet Surely you could have used salary sacrifice, pension contributions, etc to get your taxable income back below £100k rather than having to limit your family size?

@MichaelAArouet That’s not the worst bit. I had two kids in childcare 4 days/week, I earn >£100k so it cost £2400/month. I couldn’t afford it, so we stopped at two. Spitefully cutting out the top 2% of earners suppresses birth rate of the most successful, while boosting the least. Great idea.

@izharalhaqq @ColinBrazierTV @GBNEWS The law should favour British interests rather than foreign ones, so maintaining the double standard you speak of would actually be in order.

@ColinBrazierTV @GBNEWS So burning the Quran is freedom of expression, but burning Rushdie’s book should be criminal?

The Bradford riots 25 years ago this summer were an expression of territorial domination by young Muslim men. My piece today for @GBNEWS gbnews.com/opinion/bradfo…

@BBCPolitics Who is this treacherous woman?

“It’s rather unattractive watching a woman who herself came from an immigrant family leading the voice on all of this” Labour's Baroness Kennedy reflects on Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood’s proposed changes to indefinite leave to remain #PoliticsLive bbc.in/4sgvQJD

@neveragain499 @TerraOrBust They do have recourse to public funds if they’re classed as ‘refugees’. There’s also no guarantee they will leave after the student has finished.

@TerraOrBust What exactly is the issue? If someone brings 3 family members while studying, that is three people adding to the UK GDP. They don’t cost us a penny as they have no recourse to any public funds. Even for the NHS they pay the health surcharge.

So it is now the opinion of a UK court that it is "unjustifiably harsh" for a foreign student studying at a UK university, to not have their whole family come with them. Based on an ECHR interpretation. Yet again.

@Jingerella66 @AllisonPearson There should be a punishment for destroying a baby near the point of birth.

The Abortion Act 1967 is still law. No one is going to be allowed to request an abortion over the 24 week limitation, unless they fit into the stringent criteria in that same act. Not one sane woman is ever going to request that. For those women who procure their own abortion, by illegal means, there is now no penal servitude. But they will not walk away scot-free. These women are either clinically insane, or they are being coerced by someone else. In either case, these women are not helped by imprisonment. They need lasting psychiatric care and support. The psychiatric care, in itself, will reveal exactly what they've done whilst insane or whilst being coerced by other(s). They will then have to carry that with them for the rest of their lives - they won't escape that life sentence, ever. They might even be rape victims, carrying that burden, too. But it's clear that these women are so absolutely desperate that see no other way - rather like suicides. This is the only that has changed. For those few desperate, insane, women.

Abortion time limit; 12 weeks: Germany, Italy, Greece, Denmark, Austria. 14 weeks: France, Spain. 24 weeks plus no penalty for mother aborting up to full term: Britain. Vying for the Infanticide Cup with People’s Republic of China.

@imtheproblem666 @WorldByWolf It is. The mother will not be prosecuted under any circumstances.

@tery_der @WorldByWolf Luckily that isn’t what’s been approved then isn’t it 🙄 24 weeks

Why would the government enact a law that only 1% of the public support? The answer to that is the same as why they’re introducing assisted dying, forced mass third world migration on us, and legalised abortion in the first place. They’re pushing a genocide against Europeans.

@imtheproblem666 @WorldByWolf Very few people think a mother who destroys her baby in the immediate weeks before birth should escape legal punishment.

@WorldByWolf Stop your propaganda I use to like your content!

@MyG911911 @ValentinaForUSA @metpoliceuk *they’re not

@ValentinaForUSA @metpoliceuk Don’t worry there on your case, see you in court @metpoliceuk

I’m Back. And there’s absolutely NOTHING you’re going to do about it, woman. I’m signing smelly hijabs at paddington station.

@PeterJRepper @toadmeister @ShipleyWrites Were any of those individuals active before 1945?

@toadmeister @ShipleyWrites Safe and secure? Apart from murderers like the Krays, Hindley/Brady, the Wests, The Yorkshire Ripper, Shipman, Nilsen, Akinmurele, Allit, Christie, Duffy, Grieveson, Norris, Port, Neilsen, Wright, Mone, Tobin to name the most obvious. Safe and secure?

“Since 1945, the British state has taken a society that was homogeneous, safe and secure, and through reckless policies of mass migration it has destroyed all that. It’s turned the whole country into Northern Ireland.” @ShipleyWrites on the Sceptic. Full episode👇

@ifhewillit @JessEnglishrose @RupertLowe10 @5pjq5nsdqt Are you sane?

@JessEnglishrose @RupertLowe10 @5pjq5nsdqt Lowe is literally a liberal who doesn't support collective punishment beyond deportations, supports free speech and won't open up the labour/death camps that will be nessercery.

I am delighted to release Restore Britain's first ever party political broadcast.

@robin_j_brooks It might be worth adjusting these figures for inflation. Russia were being crippled by the latest blocking sanctions on Rosneft and Lukoil, forcing them into a position where the war could not be sustained for much longer. That is set to change markedly.

The discount on Urals crude versus Brent has shrunk to zero. Russia's windfall now exceeds anything we saw in 2022 after the Ukraine invasion. Recent US sanctions waivers have destigmatized Russian oil and give Putin a huge windfall. Terrible for Ukraine. robinjbrooks.substack.com/p/a-huge-windf…

@mrsdp8 @lyncey_gilbe They didn’t live in Britain in 1914. They were recruited from British colonies and served in Commonwealth armies, returning home after the conflict was over.

@lyncey_gilbe These soldiers who fought for this country and in some cases died for this country. Each one of them more a patriot then you 🫵can ever hope to be.

The black lady woukd not have been in this country at the start of ww1 sorry but I’m fed up of this ridiculous casting #thechoral

@GenericSnarky We didn’t even try to protect Poland from invasion. WWII was about containing Germany, just as the Cold War was about containing the Soviet Union.

How come England declared war to protect Poland from invasion but then gave Poland away to an invader?