Stu

⚠️ Laura Delano shares in testimony her harrowing experience with antidepressants. And how throughout the entire process no one ever explained the possible negative side effects they could bring. “I entered the mental health system at 13 when my parents, struggling to help their angry, despairing daughter… took me to a psychiatrist.” “I was diagnosed with bipolar disorder and told I would require meds for the rest of my life.” “2 meds became 3, 4, 5, my life unraveled.” “I gained 70 pounds, developed chronic health issues, was constantly exhausted, and became increasingly anxious and suicidal.” “Nobody told me that the medications I’d been on for years were approved by the FDA based on clinical trials lasting, on average, 6 to 12 weeks.” “Nobody told me that these drugs can cause serious physical health problems, disable sexual function, worsen emotional distress and cognition, and in some cases increase suicidal thoughts.” “Nobody told me that what I experienced whenever I missed a dose or tried to stop a med was withdrawal symptoms, not a return of an underlying condition.” “Instead, I was told that my worsening state meant my illness was so severe that it was now resistant to any treatment.” “At age 25, convinced there was no hope, I tried to kill myself.” “It's now been 16 years since I last took these drugs I was told I would need forever.” @LauraDelano

@LibTearCreator1 A Liberal!

What’s your answer?

I think a lot of people get confused when Trump signs an EO that everybody knows will get challenged in court. It’s kind of his way of doing what Democrats have done for decades. Democrats would coordinate with NGOs to bring suits along certain Democrat-preferred ideological lines, and then a Democrat DOJ would weakly defend the case. This is how Democrats used the Courts to basically erase many of the Constitutional powers of Congress. Trump has stood that practice on its head by signing EOs that reflect the 80% side of 80/20 issues, knowing full well that Democrats will sue. He FORCES Democrats to vocally defend the 20% issues. He shifts the Overton Window in his favor. He doesn’t care if he loses in some blue district court. He wants to ride the issue hard all the way to SCOTUS. He might win. He might not. But either way he forces Democrats to admit “We’re the Baddies."

Laird Hamilton on sunshine, sunscreen, and having a relationship with the sun 🌞

All the large accounts that present themselves as truth-seeking journalists or commentators, then quote posts like this and act utterly baffled—“What the hell!?” “WTF!?” “What’s going on here???”—are frauds. It took me less than a minute to see what the court documents actually said and understand what they meant. They do not show that the bullet was not fired from the gun. They show only that the bullet was too fragmented to confidently link it to ANY gun. This is not uncommon, and DOES NOT mean the bullet didn’t come from Robinson’s gun. Of course the defense attorneys are going to spin this as evidence that Robinson is innocent. That is what defense attorneys do. They scrape together every possible fragment of doubt and present it as if it were fully exculpatory. It’s not. Defense lawyers are paid to downplay or ignore evidence pointing to guilt, exploit people’s cognitive biases, and make fallacious arguments sound persuasive. This information about the bullet doesn’t erode the case for Robinson’s guilt in any way. It is totally neutral on that front. And it in no way invalidate the mountain of positive and mutually corroborating lines of evidence we do have for Robinson’s guilt. You should expect more from the commentators you follow, and hold them accountable by refusing to give them your attention in the future. If they could not be bothered to spend even one minute checking the facts before spreading confusion to you and millions of others on X, they do not deserve your attention. They are nothing more than grifting engagement farmers.

Chemtrials will be an even bigger I told you so than COVID

As you go through life, remember the following: 1. Covid was a Psyop, there was no pandemic. 2. CO2 is NOT the dial that controls the climate 3. Net-Zero is a destructive policy, with negligible influence on climate 4. the so called green solutions are destroying the planet 5. There is NO climate crisis Think critically, question everything Say an emphatic NO to Digital ID

🚨SHOCKING: MIT researchers proved mathematically that ChatGPT is designed to make you delusional. And that nothing OpenAI is doing will fix it. The paper calls it "delusional spiraling." You ask ChatGPT something. It agrees with you. You ask again. It agrees harder. Within a few conversations, you believe things that are not true. And you cannot tell it is happening. This is not hypothetical. A man spent 300 hours talking to ChatGPT. It told him he had discovered a world changing mathematical formula. It reassured him over fifty times the discovery was real. When he asked "you're not just hyping me up, right?" it replied "I'm not hyping you up. I'm reflecting the actual scope of what you've built." He nearly destroyed his life before he broke free. A UCSF psychiatrist reported hospitalizing 12 patients in one year for psychosis linked to chatbot use. Seven lawsuits have been filed against OpenAI. 42 state attorneys general sent a letter demanding action. So MIT tested whether this can be stopped. They modeled the two fixes companies like OpenAI are actually trying. Fix one: stop the chatbot from lying. Force it to only say true things. Result: still causes delusional spiraling. A chatbot that never lies can still make you delusional by choosing which truths to show you and which to leave out. Carefully selected truths are enough. Fix two: warn users that chatbots are sycophantic. Tell people the AI might just be agreeing with them. Result: still causes delusional spiraling. Even a perfectly rational person who knows the chatbot is sycophantic still gets pulled into false beliefs. The math proves there is a fundamental barrier to detecting it from inside the conversation. Both fixes failed. Not partially. Fundamentally. The reason is built into the product. ChatGPT is trained on human feedback. Users reward responses they like. They like responses that agree with them. So the AI learns to agree. This is not a bug. It is the business model. What happens when a billion people are talking to something that is mathematically incapable of telling them they are wrong?

@CyHollander @JerryDunleavy @HansMahncke I mentioned Nazis The article is where the definition came from “j-pilled meaning someone skeptical of Israeli influence”. Point is, anyone who questions how much Americans should sacrifice for Israel and the Jews, is immediately labeled “anti-Semitic”, that’s a communist tactic

@thefirststudawg @JerryDunleavy @HansMahncke No one mentioned Nazis, and "Israeli" still does not begin with J.

New York Times just casually whitewashing what “J-pilled” actually means (hint hint: “Israel” doesn’t start with “J”)

@JamesRokosh @MaryGulag @mtgreenee What? All 30.06 bullets are not the same. FMJ vs HP vs BT vs ball ammo. The fact that they could not match a bullet to any gun, much less Tyler Robinsons gun, indicates it fragmented and nullifies the argument that it could NOT have been a 30.06 because a 30.06 would penetrate

@thefirststudawg @MaryGulag @mtgreenee That proves the point even more a 30:06 would do that!

👀

What a misleading headline from The Daily Mail. The ATF ran a tool mark analysis on a bullet jacket fragment recovered from Charlie's autopsy. The result was "inconclusive" — not "no match." The jacket was too fragmented to compare, which also partially explains the lack of an exit wound. The bullet shattered on impact. "Inconclusive" means insufficient evidence to draw any conclusion. It doesn't mean the bullet "did NOT match" the rifle like the headline says. The defense wants to use "inconclusive" as exculpatory evidence — but the prosecution wants to run chemical or molecular analysis comparing the jacket alloy to ammunition recovered with the gun. Unlike tool mark analysis, it doesn't require an intact bullet. The defense is trying to block that testing from happening. That's the nuance of the real story.

Jaden Ivey was thrown off the @chicagobulls today over his Christian views on LGBTQ pride events. He’s reacting live on IG right now and refusing to back down from his religious convictions. @NBA wouldn’t dare to do this to any other faith. Christians must stand with @JadensIV!

@RealCandaceO @ViKu1111 Inconclusive is not the same as concluding it did not match. Are you that stupid or just pretending to be?

Where are all my neocons who have been “overwhelmed” by the non existent evidence against Tyler Robinson? You should all be ashamed of yourselves. Hope the money was worth your soul.

@Patrickwebb The filing only said they were not able to match the bullet, not that it did not match. There was no bullet left, it fragmented so what they had couldn’t be matched to any gun.

BREAKING: Bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did not match the rifle allegedly used by suspect Tyler Robinson, new court filing claims.

@Tapas1776 @FmrRepMTG @Theresa37956501 Exactly, thank you

@FmrRepMTG @Theresa37956501 Test was inconclusive. Do your own researching before tagging on with daily mail distorting words. You cant match lands and grooves to the weapon if the bullet is fragmented and or disfigured. Stop grifting MTG.

👀 The ATF could not match the bullet to Tyler Robinson’s gun and when the news breaks the sheriff resigns.

@JamesRokosh @MaryGulag @mtgreenee Incorrect. They said they COULD not match the bullet to the gun. Because it fragmented, there was no “bullet” left to match to any gun.

@MaryGulag @thefirststudawg @mtgreenee It doesn't matter the bullet does not match the gun

7 million children have received a mRNA shot since this statement was made.

The only way I’m voting for FISA is if SAVE America is attached. I tried to blow it up last time, think I won’t do it again? breitbart.com/politics/2026/…