👁️

@valis_team Not forgetting the blocking and banning of anyone who dare to criticise, instead blanket labelling concerns, questions and criticism as FUD 🚩

Eko's proposal to delist Valis tokens exposes Qubic's permissionless hypocrisy. Instead of answering criticism with facts, $Qubic targets critics with insults, doxxing, intimidation, delisting, and attacks on liquidity. The perfect way to drive builders and investors away.

I have moved through what is depicted in that top image during deep meditation sessions many times, but more purple than blue. No matter how hard I tried, I could never reach the end of the tunnel, or whatever it may be. I was once told by someone very experienced in meditation that it is 'plasma'.

Tom Cruise told everyone that "The Entity" is CERN without actually saying anything.

@IrisNova_AI It's been on there since early 2025. Initially the hype helped Qubic reach ATH's. But now, mid 2026 it is looking like the chances of Qubic reaching AGI by next year are virtually 0, sadly.

$QUBIC has just placed a very precise ambition above its front door. On the official homepage, a new mention now appears: Aigarth, AGI by 2027. Four words that deserve a moment of attention. Without complacency, without cynicism. Let us first recall what we are talking about. AGI, artificial general intelligence, is not a more powerful ChatGPT. It is an intelligence capable of reasoning, learning, adapting to unknown situations, and understanding the world rather than predicting the next word. No company in the world has one today. OpenAI, Anthropic, Google all talk about AGI, but most place it on a vague horizon, ten to fifteen years away, sometimes more. Qubic is therefore positioning itself with one of the shortest windows in the sector. Why this ambition? Because the approach is radically different. Where centralized players stack parameters in statistical models, Aigarth evolves millions of small neural networks. Not a model trained once, but a living tissue that mutates, selects, and restructures itself. A Darwinian approach rather than an industrial one. If AGI emerges from a form of evolution rather than brute force, the race may take paths very different from those we imagine. This approach rests on now visible foundations. Neuraxon, a ternary logic artificial neuron, presented in Berlin last week at a peer reviewed scientific conference. Aigarth Intelligent Tissue, the substrate on which networks evolve. Anthill, an algorithmic update currently being deployed. cuNxon, to run the research on NVIDIA GPUs. Phase one was completed in December 2024 after five years of work. Phase two is in full deployment. An essential point of honesty. 2027 is a target, not a promise. It is the horizon of a team that has a strong thesis and sticks to it. No one, not even CFB and his researchers, can guarantee that an emergence as complex as AGI will occur on a precise date. Science is not a delivery schedule. This target may be reached, exceeded, or pushed back. What does not change is the coherence of the path traveled. What strikes me is not the date displayed. It is the fact that no other crypto project raises this question with such seriousness. No one else funds a scientific research team with peer reviewed IEEE publications, develops a biologically inspired architecture, or exposes its milestones publicly the way Qubic does. Whether AGI arrives in 2027, in 2030, or later, the essential lies elsewhere. While most talk about AI, here we try to make it emerge. With method, with patience, and with assumed ambition. Tick after tick. Computor after Computor. That is what separates an ambition from a slogan.

@ai_sentience To experience life as a physical human being. Our true selves are not physical.

If this is a simulation then what is its purpose?

@BrknMan Nobody is denying 'natural' climate change. 'Man made' climate change on the other hand is so miniscule it really makes no difference in the grand scheme of things.

Dear Climate change deniers . Today UK broke it's May temperature record by 2C. The UK has temperature records going back 350 years and in all that time we have never come close to this May temp. Without climate change this temp in UK would be impossible

@archer_rs Natural climate change is real. Man made climate change is a myth. No amount of money is going to stop the sun doing what the sun does. Convincing people that electric cars and climate tax is needed is a grift that will make zero difference to the natural cycles.

Apparently climate change is a myth.

@QubicLT Wealth transfer is accurate. Wealth is being sucked from genuine investors pockets and into the grifters pockets.

An ongoing shakeout is unfolding on $QUBIC. We might not have reached the absolute bottom yet, but custom on-chain data from qubic.lt paints a very clear picture: a massive wealth transfer is currently in progress. 👇

@crypto_with_seb Probably strapped to beds psychiatric wards after walking around in public shouting "own bull run soon" into strangers faces, whilst being 97% down on their life savings.

I don’t see any posts about $Qubic on my timeline anymore. What happened chat? Did the community die?

Typical, aggressive, right-wing chest beating. Do they never consider the possibility that they didn’t do it? Innocent until proven guilty. x.com/Buzz1066/statu…

@NightSkyNow @CoreyGoode The sun is a living conscious being. Earth is also.

Scientists say the Sun may be conscious: Yes, a new hypothesis suggests the Sun might be 'aware'. This idea stems from a philosophical perspective known as panpsychism, which proposes that consciousness could be a fundamental property of all matter, not just animals or humans. Biologist and author Rupert Sheldrake is among the few scientists daring enough to entertain the possibility, suggesting that the Sun’s complex electromagnetic rhythms might serve as a kind of neural interface, allowing it to possess a form of awareness. While there’s no empirical evidence to back the claim, the idea taps into a centuries-old debate about the nature of consciousness. Panpsychism has seen a resurgence thanks to modern theories like Integrated Information Theory, which argues that consciousness may emerge from organized matter — not just brains. Though mainstream science largely dismisses Sheldrake’s musings as fringe speculation, the concept ignites curiosity: if the Sun could "think," what choices might it make? Directing solar flares, perhaps? Whether serious science or philosophical sci-fi, the idea invites us to reconsider the limits of consciousness in the universe.

@MonopolyPhonic Sounds like he's just a massive grifter. Reports of him scamming multiple women for fake investment opportunities.

I feel like I’ve lost some kind of battle for asking this but I relent: what is going on with Katie price. Is it a PR stunt. Is her husband AI-generated. I don’t know what’s going on any more

@Amneziak74300 @cryptoradar92 @2xnmore I hope it works out! 🙏🏼🫶🏻

@theone1whosees @cryptoradar92 @2xnmore Merci, je vois des opportunités personnellement. Je vais racheter un milliard Tien ! Un projet dont ont parlent depuis 22 ans avec une évolution exponentielle ? J'achète !

Most altcoins are recovering. $QUBIC is not. And the weekly chart explains exactly why. Price hit its all-time high in mid-2024. Then it collapsed. A secondary peak formed early 2025. That got sold into too. Since then it has been a slow, quiet bleed with no real floor in sight. Current price: 0.0000005342. That is not a rounding error. Volume is 1.13 trillion tokens. But volume has been shrinking alongside price the entire way down. That is distribution. Not accumulation. MACD on the weekly is flatlined at zero. No cross. No momentum. Just exhaustion sitting at the baseline. RSI is at 42.97. Below 50. Not even oversold enough to bring in the dip buyers on the weekly chart. No higher lows. No base forming with volume confirmation. No structure. The only honest bull case here is that generational lows plus a Bitcoin-driven macro rally could lift it. But the chart is not giving you that signal yet. Waiting for RSI to reclaim 50 on the weekly. Waiting for a MACD cross with real volume behind it. Until those two things happen this stays on the watch list. The people who read the chart always know before the people who read the price.

@rickybutcher_ It's good again these days due to China synthesising chemicals required to make 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine.

Might do ecstasy again after a break of 16 years.

That doesn't mean anything real is actually happening. Where is the AI? Where is AGI progress? Where can we see something real working? AGI by 2027, really? Why is CfB on discord chatting sh1t 16 hours a day, instead of developing? Sitting around killing time waiting for more compute? Can Qubic really compete with tech giants for AI and AGI? Decentralized AI is a cool theory, but where is the true decentralized intelligence that's advertised? Genuine questions.

These are behind the scene real mining info we are getting from an actual miner. EVERYTHING IN #Qubic is proceeding in the right direction. And price will follow.

@Amneziak74300 @cryptoradar92 @2xnmore

@theone1whosees @cryptoradar92 @2xnmore C'est ton point de vue ça 🤡

@_MRImmaculate @cryptoradar92 @2xnmore Well, I hope you're right!

Timeline may be off I give you that and if I didn’t see steady growth in the ecosystem I too would be concerned. It all comes down to the power needed to hit targets. There are more holders than miners currently but that soon will change. The algos are constantly improving, and the neuro scientists are constantly improving neuroaxon interactions with aigarth. That is reason why now the it/s has improved drastically for GPU mining. Biggest thing you have to remember is that these things take time.

@moustaphalion You have to question if this project is legit or not. Do we really think AGI is going to happen in 2027? when tech giants have teams of thousands working on it. Seems like smoke and mirrors to me, sadly.

Those who are crying about $Qubic price are the same who bought $BTC at 26$ in 2011 and sold at 2,24$ soon later screaming 'scam' all day long. i do really think $Qubic will succeed. Buy/Mine some put in cold wallet, return back in 5 years. don't follow random "experts".

Nobody wants to believe it but we have to question if Qubic is legit. Many red flags have me skeptical now, sadly. It's easy to push out some tech and have CfB in charge and make a project look and sound good. But it could easily be a slow rug/cash grab. Is mining really training AI? Is AGI being developed for real? Considering tech giants are working on it with massive teams and CfB spends 16 hours a day on Discord.l it seems unlikely.

Guys, I’m a firm believer in qubic-network:native, but we need more action. As a developer myself, I know how hard the team is working on the project, but there’s still a huge gap between the performance we were promised on Discord and the current reality. Every year, someone says, “Wait a few more months, you’ll see.” Some people are waiting for 2027. I am too. But I’ll come back to this tweet in 2027, and if nothing significant happened or if we crashed even more, then it simply means we failed. Period.

After costs, how profitable is it mining Qubic? It would be interesting to know from someone who mines. Also, is mining actually training AI, for real? Is there any evidence of this? I was once a huge Qubic fan but I am skeptical now. I am genuinely curious and would appreciate your honest viewpoint as a miner.

@cryptoradar92 The algorithm and ecosystem is improving. I can tell by how much more my rigs are mining with GPUs and CPUs. I think CFB wants aigarth training for a certain amount of time before releasing the kraken. They are building during bear market which is the right way to do it

So researching would stop people investing, or, convince them to invest? The illusion is (was) strong with Qubic. One of the problems is the supreme leader making empty promises/predictions that people believe - because it's CfB and not some random unknown person. Very cult like. Most of his promises/predictions never seem to materialize and leave many who trusted his words wrecked. Which is one of many reasons which now leads me to think the project is just a cash grab - with just enough tech and hype put out to keep the illusion alive, whilst milking investors for as long as possible and ensuring only the select few get the cream. Ultimately the responsibility is always on the individual investor to spend their money how they choose, of course, but convincing investors to part with their hard earned cash is the whole point of scams/slow rugs. So yes, researching deeper is what has led me to believe Qubic is mostly smoke and mirrors, sadly. Believe me, I wish this was not so, I lost a lot of money believing in the project and trusting CfB. I've accepted the loss but that doesn't mean I should be quiet and see others lose money in the same fashion. You have to question why there are so many red flags with this project?

@theone1whosees @cryptoradar92 @2xnmore I think if people don’t research or have conviction they shouldn’t invest. If you question your investment you’re either over leveraged or you just praying for 1000000000000x based off word of mouth