Stewart

@miatlu_mia @deborahbracciot Ok, I’ll bite; Why are referring to the UK case and not the USA case? Amber wasn’t even a party to the UK case. It was a tabloid (the Sun) vs Depp.

@thestewman67 @deborahbracciot It appears you really don't know what he said about the incident in the UK, do you Stewart? Maybe you should look it up and compare his different versions of events.

Amber Heard is not a victim; comparing her to real victims is an insult and a mockery of us all. Amber Heard is an abuser and a liar, as has been established in court, and she is a serious detriment to real feminism.

Susan Collins voted to give ICE and CBP $70 billion. She owns the consequences of that vote.

If #AmberHeard and #JohnnyDepp go back to court; I hope Amber will go to prison once and for all - she cannot continue getting away with falsely accusing Johnny Depp, ruin his life and career! #AmberHeardWasNeverSilenced #LockUpAmberHeard #AmberHeardIsALiar #AmberHeardIsAnAbuser

#LivelyvWayfarer Wayfarer's Opposition to Attorney's Fees: Strong and Well-Reasoned Opposition When I reviewed Lively's fees and costs request of $8m and the rationale behind, I described it as ridiculous, nonsensical, and preposterous. As such, I was apprehensive that Wayfarer would go overboard and use inflammatory language in its opposing brief. I was pleasantly surprised that Wayfarer did not take the above approach. Rather, Wayfarer calmly and systematically dismantled Lively's ridiculous fee request. Wayfarer correctly pointed out that Sec 47.1 fee request only applies to the fees incurred for defending the defamation action and not to the entire complaint. Other strong arguments: Lack of invoices/evidentiary support; failure to explain how the other causes of action were inextricably intertwined with the defamation action; vague descriptions of work done; duplication of work, etc. Wayfarer also did something that I had suggested in a previous post: Wayfarer asked Judge Liman to use the New York Times' fee request of $181,622.70 as the benchmark amount. Finally, Wayfarer did something clever and potentially very impactful. It cited a recent SDNY case in which Lively's lawyers had their fee requests reduced by the judge: PDV USA, Inc. v. Interamerican Consulting Inc., 2026 WL 1283316, at *7-8 (S.D.N.Y. May 11, 2026) (reducing Willkie Farr fee request by 30%, 15% for rates and 15% for hours, for failure to provide evidence necessary to assess their reasonableness, and reducing Gottlieb’s 2026 rate to $1,677.90 in a “complex commercial matter”). Wayfarer also referenced language from Judge Liman's decision in another case: "While an attorney’s customary billing rate and fee arrangement with the client may indicate a reasonable rate, a client’s agreement to pay an expensive rate does not mean that the rate is reasonable and may be imposed on an opposing party." Eletson v. Levona Holdings Ltd., 2026 WL 1745709, at *9 (S.D.N.Y. June 2, 2026) (Liman, J.). With the above two cases, Wayfarer is letting the judge know that Lively's lawyers were recently found to have overbilled and that if they possibly overbilled Lively, Wayfarer should not be made to pay the unreasonable fees simply because Lively was willing to pay the fees. In conclusion, it is very, very likely that Judge Liman will substantially reduce the amount of fees.

The Introduction Hits Hard: Lively’s Research Into Her Own Perjury!! I think the introduction is a banger. The decision to highlight @blakelively’s own research into possible perjury exposure from her California CRD complaint is a strong opening move. Nothing grabs attention quite like the possibility that @blakelively's own filing—the one meant to strengthen her case—may end up becoming the thing that creates the biggest problem for her 😁😁😁😁 #blakelively #justinbaldoni #livelyvsbaldoni

AOC: I said this a couple of weeks ago: I would not be surprised if, when ICE funding started up again, we would start to see more civilian deaths at the hands of ICE. And that’s exactly what has happened. When you open the trenches with all of this money that Republicans have now funneled to ICE without any oversight, you’re going to see abuses of power. That’s exactly what’s happening. Notice that we didn’t see things like this happening with the same degree of regularity when we froze ICE funding. And now that it’s been opened up again, we’re seeing multiple incidents.

Leslie, who was circulating those fake HR complaints? Where did all of that go?

Wayfarer found out that the New York Times had been colluding with Blake Lively for months before publishing its hit piece on Justin Baldoni. Reading Wayfarer's amended complaint is LITERALLY like reading a horror story. Now that we know what we know... dam.tmz.com/document/fd/o/…

@miatlu_mia @deborahbracciot If you actually looked in depth in this incident, then you wouldn’t have posted what you did.

@thestewman67 @deborahbracciot I looked in depth at this incident. Hence why I asked you to describe what he said about it in his case against NGN.

@miatlu_mia @deborahbracciot Because you are not being honest about the “evidence” and what court transcripts say. You are only looking at he head butted her but not the why or how did it happened. It’s a classic she says / he says on that incident.

@deborahbracciot @thestewman67 Why are there court transcripts and submitted evidence to back it up then?

@miatlu_mia @deborahbracciot Do you want to discuss the headbutting incident? I’ll be more than happy to discuss this with you?

@thestewman67 @deborahbracciot He admitted to headbutting her. Throwing the phone at her. Verbally abusing her. Admitted to physical fights-that he denied ever happened until he was confronted with the audios. Did he use minimising language, as abuser's nearly always do? Yes Hence why IPV experience is helpful

@miatlu_mia @deborahbracciot You said that he was paying them. I want to see proof that he was paying them. Don’t change what you alleged.

@deborahbracciot @thestewman67 And they were in contact with waldman who was instructing them on how to present the information. He was leaking confidential information to select Youtubers well before the UK trial, let alone the US one. With editing instructions.

@deborahbracciot @miatlu_mia Do you see the pattern here. Amber Heard, supporters spread a lie and when you call them out on it they block you. These accounts seem to be coordinating misinformation.

@thestewman67 @miatlu_mia They’re paid liars. They keep spreading lies and even deny the obvious; they’re obsessed with a violent woman who uses them to stay in the spotlight. But being in the spotlight on X is like being rich in Monopoly. Pathetic.

@miatlu_mia @deborahbracciot LIE: Depp, never admitted to hitting her. In fact, it was Amber who as on audio admitted to hitting Depp. Question: why do you feel the need to lie about this?

@thestewman67 @deborahbracciot You can't in fact. Depp admitted to physical assault on audio and in text. Made the usual promises to never do it again.

@miatlu_mia @deborahbracciot Show proof please because this is an allegation that had never been proven by Amber supporter.

@deborahbracciot @thestewman67 A couple of youtubers that were directly in contact with depp's lawyer waldman, who were fed talking points by him, made hundreds of thousands of dollars from trial coverage- if you want to talk about paid liars.

@miatlu_mia @deborahbracciot You can say the same for any evidence

@thestewman67 @deborahbracciot People who aren't as well educated in IPV can easily mistake by the reactions of a victim as the aggressor. The problem with those audios is- most people didn't hear the entire recordings. The snippets played in court didn't tell the whole story.

@raleighsupes @deborahbracciot I would say that is a typical response from what I have incounter from Blake and Amber supporters. It’s not about facts but algorithms

@thestewman67 @deborahbracciot my replies are for smart takes only, which are not possible for anyone who supports that wifebeater. i want people that find my post to have to work a little harder (by clicking post interactions) to see the dregs of humanity and their ignorance, like deb here. hope that helps!

@JungleJuice786 it’s not about facts but influencing the algorithm

Why don't you post screenshots of exactly where in the settlement Depp admitted any of this. Bc you all love to make up bullshit without providing any evidence (bc there isn't any).

@R0ttenStrawbrry @deborahbracciot They blocked me anyway from responding. These accounts are not legit. They are coordinate efforts to try to influence the algorithm

@R0ttenStrawbrry @deborahbracciot Something tells me anytime someone contradicts your viewpoint you consider that harassment.

@deborahbracciot 😂 and they blocked me anyway from responding. They don’t want to debate.

@deborahbracciot Noticed that these misandrists all disable their comments because they know their alternative facts would be called out.