lsm_

956 posts

lsm_ banner
lsm_

lsm_

@thisispiyushK

Dreaming about Prime Intellect. Building https://t.co/v9WBgaH0bZ

Katılım Ağustos 2016
339 Takip Edilen101 Takipçiler
lsm_
lsm_@thisispiyushK·
@StefanoErmon I love diffusion models. AR models getting 500 TPS on 8xB300 is sota while diffusion models are casually crushing 1000 TPS.
English
0
0
1
22
lsm_
lsm_@thisispiyushK·
@kwangmoo_yi Wish there was a blog somewhere guiding through paper writing and submission processes
English
0
0
0
95
Kwang Moo Yi
Kwang Moo Yi@kwangmoo_yi·
For example, allows me to point out critical experimental flaws that could be a sole reason to reject the paper despite the paper having a strong accept rating. I can confidently point this out NOW, to be rebutted by the authors in case I am wrong.
English
1
0
4
788
Kwang Moo Yi
Kwang Moo Yi@kwangmoo_yi·
I'm gonna regret saying this, but I like this year's NeurIPS decision to make me write initial metareviews. Gives me an early enough assessment and feedback to **both** authors and reviewers. (1/2)
English
1
3
23
6.5K
Jason Lee
Jason Lee@jasondeanlee·
Was there just a usage reset for codex?
English
13
0
49
6.7K
clankr
clankr@clankrmedia·
Researchers built a soft floating robot for indoor interaction. It uses helium and flapping fins instead of propellers. The result is quiet, lightweight, and safe to touch. It can follow people, give reminders, and act as a study buddy. Published at ACM DIS 2026.
English
221
885
7.6K
2M
lsm_
lsm_@thisispiyushK·
@praneetdutta Man I just read hellopomo's "m" as "rn" (RN) and was very confused
English
0
0
0
25
Praneet Dutta
Praneet Dutta@praneetdutta·
Something's cooking, stay tuned.
English
8
18
44
3K
lsm_
lsm_@thisispiyushK·
@durov You guys need to get in VR
English
0
0
0
18
Thomas Bloom
Thomas Bloom@thomasfbloom·
@jdlichtman Update - have now read this proof and yes it is correct (and formalised!), so the site has been updated.
English
1
0
16
572
lsm_
lsm_@thisispiyushK·
@matthewjgunton 😅 "when op is mem bound try to use less mem".. any other insight I missed ?
English
0
0
1
64
Matthew Gunton
Matthew Gunton@matthewjgunton·
Inferencing with lower precision datatypes moves less data across your bandwidth and gives you access to low-precision-specific hardware For example, an H100 SXM has approximately 3,350 GB/s of HBM bandwidth Imagine that each decoding step requires the GPU to read 5 GB of model weights and other data from HBM. At the theoretical maximum bandwidth, that movement has a lower bound of: 5 GB / 3,350 GB/s = ~1.5 ms FP32 uses four bytes per value. FP16 uses two This drops the amount of data to move through memory to 2.5 GB, resulting in a floor of: 2.5 GB / 3,350 GB/s = ~0.75 ms Then when you are doing your matmuls and other calculations during the forward pass you can sometimes access parts of the hardware only setup for certain precisions (eg FP8 tensor core instructions in H100s) I need to call out: this does not mean inference will always speed up by exactly 2×. Inference kernels can accumulate in higher precision, unpack quantized values, apply scaling factors, or simply upcast data unexpectedly But the rule of thumb remains useful: when decode is memory-bound, reducing the number of bytes moved per token directly improves performance
Matthew Gunton tweet media
English
3
6
43
3K
lsm_
lsm_@thisispiyushK·
@j4orz not saying it will happen 100% but there's a possibility (maybe Yann LeCun's team or SSI discovers something). Remember seeing posts on twitter early on, saying we won't cross the 4k-10k context length anytime soon.. which we did. so just a hunch.
English
0
0
0
9
Jeffrey Zhang
Jeffrey Zhang@j4orz·
i've been hammering on both fable and sol for sitp's intermezzo to formalize (and better understand) the tight vs leaky distinction, and what exactly are the measurable spaces language models are defined on from cotterell's (eth zurich) course notes. these are a great complement to jurafsky, eisenstein, and manning. fable and sol seems to continue the (slight) divergence of opus and chat5.5's rl stacks? x.com/willdepue/stat… i'd really like something in between the two post-trainings. because at times fable is just way too much and wants to explain the world to me. this is amazing alien-like intelligence (i LOVE the compression) but it feels like a rocketship for the mind rather than a motorcycle. on the other hand sol's (whether intentional or not) simpleness is what is needed. using opus before fable is also a nice combo. and beyond the post-training, there are so many times where i wish the model could tell me, "based off your questioning you are completely conceptualizing/attacking/inquiring about this the wrong way, this is how you should go about it. definition 1.1, definition 1.2, lemma 1.3, theorem 1.4, etc." a lot of times i feel like these models don't have a good theory of mind (world model?) for humans (i.e thomas nagel what it's like to be a bat), and entropy collapse is more likely when learning with claude/chat rather than coding with cc/codex. it is really up to the learner to reset the line of questioning if confusion starts arising. talking to fable is starting to feel more and more like browsing the collective intelligence of stackoverflow or wikipedia. this is akin to some of the stuff that @3blue1brown and @dwarkesh_sp were riffing about recently. also for the lesswrong asi pilled folks that believe alien-like compression which is out of sync with humans in the space of minds doesn't really matter given that humans will be soon out of the loop, my priors and the way i've been updating tell me the opposite. i expect this century is going to look much more like jevons paradox, ai-human hybrids, rather than some ai 2027 (and most recently ai 2040) ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
will depue@willdepue

it's weird how much better Claude is at Max reasoning vs High at writing. real improvement from test time compute that it really doesn't feel like GPT has. its still wild how much better Opus writing is better than GPT. something clearly missing, maybe wrong, in OpenAI's RL stack

English
1
1
4
1.2K
lsm_
lsm_@thisispiyushK·
@sgl_project been going through sglang lately, adding this to the list
English
1
0
1
61
SGLang
SGLang@sgl_project·
In two weeks since the model launch, we pushed GLM-5.2 NVFP4 on SGLang to 500+ tok/s/user at bs=1 on 8xB300. Thanks to our new TopK-V2 kernel, interactivity stays essentially flat from 80K all the way out to 1M-token context. We attacked it on two fronts: cutting overhead (zero-bubble scheduling, sync removal, kernel fusion) and rebuilding the hot kernels themselves (TopK-V2, CuTe DSL GEMM). Check the blog for the full technical details and repro commands 👇 lmsys.org/blog/2026-07-1…
LMSYS Org@lmsysorg

Serving GLM5.2 NVFP4 Agentic Workload with SGLang: How We Reached 500 TPS on 8xB300 at bs=1 In this deep dive, we explain how SGLang reaches 500+ tok/s/user at bs=1 on 8xB300, with 18 to 34% higher single-user interactivity within two weeks since day-0, and 6 to 11% better peak throughput at high concurrency, benchmarked on a real multi-turn agentic coding workload. Our new TopK-V2 kernel is 2.33x faster at 80K ISL, scaling to 10.17x at 1M ISL, keeping interactivity essentially flat out to 1M tokens. Part of the story is the architecture itself. GLM-5.2 applies IndexShare to its DSA layers and ships a stronger MTP head reusing IndexShare and KVShare. The rest comes from our serving optimizations. Special thanks to @NVIDIAAI for the help in day-0 support of GLM-5.2 NVFP4, and to @Zai_org for IndexShare in SGLang!

English
2
6
34
4K
lsm_
lsm_@thisispiyushK·
@vikhyatk What's your plan after that?
English
1
0
1
86
vik
vik@vikhyatk·
waiting for ai to automate software engineering
vik tweet media
English
7
0
71
3.7K
lsm_
lsm_@thisispiyushK·
@KyeGomezB That's how you get prime intellect and personal universes
English
1
0
0
145
Jonathan Frankle
Jonathan Frankle@jefrankle·
Catching up on the summer fashion trends.
Jonathan Frankle tweet media
English
8
0
51
4.5K
lsm_
lsm_@thisispiyushK·
@norpadon Yeah looks vibecoded tbh (no disrespect to the author)
English
0
0
0
59
Artur Chakhvadze
Artur Chakhvadze@norpadon·
Vibecoding monkey bastards made GitHub totally fucking unusable...
English
6
4
74
6.7K
lsm_
lsm_@thisispiyushK·
@norpadon No idea what is this code about but somehow I keep thinking the formula should be 0.1 * math.log(max(1, self.scaling_factor)) + 1.0
English
1
0
0
94
Artur Chakhvadze
Artur Chakhvadze@norpadon·
This is not a joke btw, I am literally sending people code screenshots
Artur Chakhvadze tweet media
English
3
0
11
702