Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Killing Abel Novel M. Tieman
30.5K posts

Killing Abel Novel M. Tieman
@TiemanMichaelA
Father of three, Dad along the way to a few more. Transitioning Towards The Truth. Engineer, inventor, writer, theologian. God's greatest creation, the women.
Las Vegas, NV Katılım Şubat 2023
344 Takip Edilen1.3K Takipçiler
Killing Abel Novel M. Tieman retweetledi
Killing Abel Novel M. Tieman retweetledi

@FrankLuntz @jessicadean Affordability is free trade.
English

Affordability is not the stock market.
Affordability is not job growth.
Affordability is not economic development.
But affordability is the top issue for midterms.
I spoke with @JessicaDean about whether Republicans can make good on President Trump's promises by November.
English
Killing Abel Novel M. Tieman retweetledi
Killing Abel Novel M. Tieman retweetledi
Killing Abel Novel M. Tieman retweetledi

A folded lead tablet found on Mount Ebal…
Possibly dating to the time of Joshua.
Small discovery. Big questions.
👉 CreationToday.org/471
English

@KobeissiLetter LOL ... the guy with nothing will always be farther away... doesn't anyone think?
English

The wealth gap has never been wider:
US private sector financial assets relative to US GDP are up to a record 6.7x.
This means that the total value of stocks, bonds, and other financial instruments held by the private sector has never been larger relative to the real economy.
This also surpasses the previous all-time high of 6.3x seen in 2021 after one of the sharpest market recoveries in history.
The size of private sector financial assets relative to GDP has more than DOUBLED since the 1970s low.
When financial assets outpace the real economy, the wealthy get richer, and workers get left behind.
Own assets or be left behind.

English

@AkramKarani @DrFrankTurek You will be judged as well and your works will be found wanting. We're all sinful beings we've all sinned against God we're all guilty. I I have nothing to pay except for my life. You have nothing to pay except for your life.
English

@TiemanMichaelA @DrFrankTurek you are going to be judged by Allah.
all of your actions matter and they only belong to you alone.

English

@Naxalt_Revenge @AiG Bro where was in the beginning plagiarized from?
English

@TiemanMichaelA @AiG "verbatim"
lol. bro, we know the torah was written in the 3rd century bce and heavily plagiarized pre existing texts.
assuming a god created everything is pretext.

English

@AkramKarani @DrFrankTurek ay ay aye!
I welcome you to Christianity... Christ's work on the cross is all that was needed, now we all can be free of guilt! Something an Ishmaelite can never experience!
English

@TiemanMichaelA @DrFrankTurek ayayay...
i invite you to Islam.
God is Allah, Jesus is a prophet and the Messiah.
Islam is the great nation God promised Ishmael.
God is One, your Creator, the One who was with Adam in Eden.
English

@SinvexActual @Hedgeye "not just a bunch of pumpkins"? Pumpkins when it comes to farming will do just fine against a corporate bureaucracy. A 1000 acre farm will yield better than a 100,000 acre farm almost every time.
English

@TiemanMichaelA @Hedgeye Around here it's more common as The Shell Creek Watershed Improvement Group (SCWIG) which started in the late 90s and other things lead to changes.
Ag science is massive in farming communities, it's not just a bunch of pumpkins throwing nitrogen everywhere expecting gains.
English

🚜 Farms in the south are struggling:
78% of Southern farmers say they can’t afford all required fertilizer this year, the highest of any region. 
The South is exposed for two reasons: crop mix and pre-booking behavior.
Just 19% of Southern producers pre-booked fertilizer ahead of the season, vs. 30% in the Northeast, 31% in the West, and 67% in the Midwest. 
Cotton, rice, and peanut growers, largely concentrated in the South, barely locked anything in before fertilizer prices skyrocketed.
Only 13% of cotton growers and 9% of peanut growers pre-booked. 
Those are also the most fertilizer-intensive crops on the board.
Rice runs $1,308/acre to produce, peanuts $1,166, and cotton $943 vs. $658 for soybeans and $396 for wheat.
U.S. farm sector losses have exceeded $50 billion across the past three crop years.
Nearly all (94%) farmers say their financial situation has worsened or stayed the same vs. last year.
Farms are getting squeezed.

English

Yes, I agree... Testing is expensive, time consuming, not always accurate so many just wing it... I just know that really good farmers rely on their experience far more than the ag salesmen. Like every expertise, farming is more of an art than a science and the unartful tend to over fertilize. Corporate farms, which covers a broad portion, eliminates some large portion of the art of farming, to the corporate rules.
Then comes crop rotation, some farmers just won't rotate so they have no choice but to use somewhat more fertilizer, that goes to over regulation. Monoculture forces more fertilizer on many, I am sure.
English

@TiemanMichaelA @Hedgeye Samples are taken regularly as is water quality which they've actively improved massively. Average is test every few years but as many as 1/3rd test annually as it's cheaper to test than it is to over fertilize.
English

No. But religion tells us that, via mostly John. John wrote in a way that leaves very little if any distance between Jesus is God.
I take that part of the trinity. As you likely know that is a tricky subject amongst Christians. I have my own way of saying it.
-God is Time/existence.
-Jesus is life/present time.
-The Holy Spirit is God's Spirit of what doesn't exist, the past and the future.
There is very little room between those three, Time, present, past /future.
All are part of the idea of Time aka entropy.
English

My point remains that "fertilizer" manufactures are sales people, they want to always sell more, they make commission and convince farmers, who trust them, and who want to have higher yields into using more than is needed. There are countless stories of farmers largely skipping a year of urea and not seeing much if an reduction in yield.
Again, how often do you / your friends send 1 or 2 samples per 10 acres to the lab for nitrogen levels? The truth is, most farms send very few soil samples to the lab!
Everyone should understand the 50% of the recommended nitrogen in soil will often yield just as good of a yield in crops as 80% will.
English

@TiemanMichaelA @Hedgeye Right, they learned decades ago that it wasn't a prudent tactic. It leads to crop burn, fucks up nutrient fixing, and kills natural bacteria that causes healthy generation of top soil. This isn't 1995.
English

Study Title: Fertilizer nitrogen management for sustainable crop production
Key Points:
- This comprehensive review discusses how farmers often apply nitrogen fertilizers at rates higher than crop requirements.
- It documents that over-application does not necessarily increase yields** but leads to **economic losses and environmental pollution**.
- The study emphasizes the importance of precision agriculture and soil testing to determine optimal nitrogen rates.
Citation: Raun, W. R., & Johnson, G. V. (1999). **"Improving nitrogen use efficiency for cereal production." Agronomy Journal, 91(3), 357-363.
(While this specific paper focuses on cereal crops, it discusses the broader implications of nitrogen overuse.)
Summary: - The authors highlight that **excess nitrogen application is common** and often driven by the desire to maximize yields.
- They show through various experiments and data analyses that **diminishing returns** occur beyond certain application thresholds.
- The paper recommends **site-specific fertilization** to optimize nitrogen use and reduce environmental impact.
Additional Resources:
- FAO Report: "Fertilizer Use in Sustainable Agriculture"* (FAO, 2017)
Explores overuse patterns globally and advocates for balanced fertilization.
Meta-Analysis: Zhang et al., 2015** in *Nature Communications*
Demonstrates that in many cases, applying nitrogen beyond crop needs yields negligible benefits but increases pollution.
English

@TiemanMichaelA @Hedgeye "let grok judge"
I not only grew up working farms, but still live in ag central. I don't know a single farmer spending more on fertilizer than is absolutely necessary.
To begin with its extremely detrimental to the crops to over fertilize.
English















