
Tim Kindberg
13.2K posts

Tim Kindberg
@timkindberg
Digital creative: https://t.co/F8FONWTXRv. Writer: https://t.co/LXXSTdwts7. Distributed systems book: https://t.co/KhSLuUKfS8. Latest novel https://t.co/msjhpbeotP


"Once you acknowledge the truism that AI output is speech, almost all regulation of AI is ipso facto illegal. Government has no more legal right to regulate AI than it has to regulate the New York Times. Even if you’re a convinced doomer, you have to admit that the danger of existing LLMs is not 'clear and present,' much less 'imminent.'" betonit.ai/p/llms-and-sco…

The G in AGI stands for "general". General intelligence does not mean that you have been specifically trained for a large range of tasks. It means you can approach any NEW task and figure it out, just like humans do. If regular people can do it on their own (no guidance, no tools), why should AGI require special handholding and handcrafted instructions? If it's AGI, why would there still be a human in the loop, using their own human intelligence to guide the model on every new task?



The rapid advances we see in AI-derived mathematical proofs are almost certainly not representative of science in general. A core driver of these advances is that AI-derived proofs can be translated into a highly structured human-designed verification language, which can then be checked using traditional computer programs. The AI slop-cannon can generate as many slop attempts as needed to get a proof that works, because humans already built the de-slopification engine that automates digging the diamonds out of the slop. This kind of cheap validation does not exist in data science or the empirical sciences more broadly. In fact, validation in the sciences is often orders of magnitude more expensive than all the other parts, which is why AI is going to be much less effective there.

Can Nature please raise its standards

As a statistician, I keep asking myself how all these AI people are dealing with the massive potential for catastrophic errors in critical analyses, and the answer keeps being they either didn't think about it at all, or they don't care.




Mueller was destructive and vindictive. He ruined people for a living. He was a terrible person and responsible for one of the worst manipulations of US intelligence in history - and he did it with full knowledge that he was lying.

Read this over the weekend (bonus if you read all the papers in the Research List) and you’ll be among the “very few who understand how far-reaching” the shift to World Models is. notboring.co/p/world-models

Donald J. Trump Truth Social Post 01:26 PM EST 03.20.26 Robert Mueller just died. Good, I’m glad he’s dead. He can no longer hurt innocent people! President DONALD J. TRUMP










