Tim | ONLYUP™ 💹

15.7K posts

Tim | ONLYUP™ 💹 banner
Tim | ONLYUP™ 💹

Tim | ONLYUP™ 💹

@timonlyup

I sometimes have good ideas

On the way up Katılım Mayıs 2022
397 Takip Edilen3.7K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Tim | ONLYUP™ 💹
Tim | ONLYUP™ 💹@timonlyup·
Reasonable men never achieve anything great That’s why I am completely retarded
Tim | ONLYUP™ 💹 tweet media
English
22
11
290
98.6K
Tim | ONLYUP™ 💹
Tim | ONLYUP™ 💹@timonlyup·
whys Napoleon remembered as a great leader and the other guy isn't?
English
0
0
0
110
Tim | ONLYUP™ 💹
Tim | ONLYUP™ 💹@timonlyup·
Society is missing a unifying goal. My conclusion: we should maximize the ability to act, on an individual level and as a whole. Individually, that means everyone having access to education, a decent home, mobility, the resources to shape their own life. Maximum agency. Collectively, it means a society capable of eliminating an asteroid if there's one. Capable of generating 1000x today's energy if that's what a problem requires. Capable of solving what needs solving. That's a goal worth pursuing
English
0
0
0
35
🏆TORRES CHAMP 2026🔥 #LocoMafia
i despise conor but i pray he beats max cause this fight would bring a level of hype that the sport desperately needs right now lmfao i'm talking khabib/conor levels
🏆TORRES CHAMP 2026🔥 #LocoMafia tweet media
English
56
14
615
17.2K
Tim | ONLYUP™ 💹
Tim | ONLYUP™ 💹@timonlyup·
If it’s 3 rounds I am betting on mcgregor and if it’s 5 rounds I am turning the TV off after 2
English
0
0
0
104
Tim | ONLYUP™ 💹
Tim | ONLYUP™ 💹@timonlyup·
This summer is gonna be truly special Sun, girls, World Cup, ufc freedom, mcgregor fight, We are not gonna be in our 20s forever lads The world is having wonderful vibes rn Let’s do it 🔥
English
0
0
1
110
UFC
UFC@ufc·
CONOR MCGREGOR vs MAX HOLLOWAY 2 !!!! Your International Fight Week main event is confirmed! [ #UFC329 LIVE July 11 on @ParamountPlus ]
UFC tweet media
English
2.4K
13.1K
92.8K
11.1M
Tim | ONLYUP™ 💹
Tim | ONLYUP™ 💹@timonlyup·
@primetateHQ @Cobratate Yes but not because of the stupid flexing he spoke sense in a time where it was rare and now in a time with confusion he still speaks sharp words
English
1
0
6
141
Prime Tate
Prime Tate@primetateHQ·
Has Andrew Tate inspired you?
Prime Tate tweet media
English
199
34
816
23.8K
Tim | ONLYUP™ 💹
Tim | ONLYUP™ 💹@timonlyup·
There’s nothing respectable about having lots of women It’s obvious Any literal Junkie can have multiple women and broke Muslims stillhave 5 wife’s as soon as you become somebody you’ll have abundant women appearing in your inbox At the end of the day, everybody eventually realizes there’s no point in wasting your energy on hoes
English
0
0
1
113
Tim | ONLYUP™ 💹
Tim | ONLYUP™ 💹@timonlyup·
“you can just do things“ Is the most honest, best and probably the only advice one has to hear and internalize
English
0
0
2
55
Tim | ONLYUP™ 💹
Tim | ONLYUP™ 💹@timonlyup·
Trends come and go and it doesn’t make sense to follow some random hype It only makes sense to follow your passion, interests and skills. Everything else is fugazzi, the pendulum swings back and forth anyway Meaning, if you do your thing you’ll catch the pendulum at the right time eventually
English
0
0
0
57
Tim | ONLYUP™ 💹
Tim | ONLYUP™ 💹@timonlyup·
What I’ve found is that AI generally can speed up your work at least by a factor of 2 and summing up stuff or getting the foot wet in smth is maybe 10x quicker if companies don’t see any returns it’s because the 50% of time savings are now wasted and workers become lazy or they cba to double check if the AI delivered good results
English
0
0
0
178
David
David@yourealazyfvck·
Zarak is spot on with this The narrative control here from the largest companies in the world is strong I'll just speak on what I've seen at the corporate level - those who aren't seeing financial returns from AI have no clue how to use it. We've discovered loads of different ways we can use our Voice AI software to either cut costs and increase revenue tied to very niche-specific industries that we know 100% for a fact that we can deliver value in. Companies that are allocating AI budgets towards using AI to make people "more productive" in their companies is a psyop as you have to spend a lot of time educating yourself on how to actually use it in your job. Being able to prompt claude or chatgpt which is where most of the budget is going is not going to deliver a meaningful return and usually results in wasted time = less productivity. Also, agentic ai depending on its use case is going to create a lot of value regardless of if we've already reached the upper limit as there are tons of easily-augmentable or replaceable people in brain dead customer service or sales jobs in which Voice Agents can already automate (things like compliance verification, payment system lookup, appointment scheduling, basic note taking on calls, customer service surveys and satisfaction surveys, IVR systems, etc). All of this is super niche dependent and companies will be racing to adopt the stuff that actually works. The mindshare narrative that is being created using marketing bux will eventually die in a few years and the wheat will be separated from the chaff.
Zarak@zzarakkk

Here's a grade 3 explanation for the slow ones Why AI sucks 1. AI is being shoved down your throats every single day. Huge marketing budgets from the biggest company's in the world who are literally force feeding AI to their own workforce and seeing worse results/more mishaps. Ask urself why these company's are losing so much money while simultaneously spending so much money on trying to get people to actually use it. CEOs who don't understand shit and are not in the trenches see an AI post on X, start to feel like they're falling behind, and bark at their employees to start implementing AI - not realising that in most cases it just creates extra work for the employees with more revisions and decreased productivity and more costs 2. AI hallucinates and it can't be fixed. Because LLMs are probabilistic, they hallucinate. So if an 'agent' has a 95% success rate on a single task - which sounds great - chaining 10 tasks together drops the overall success rate to about 60%. In work settings, that compounding failure rate makes true autonomy impossible. The AI company's (and normies alike) defend this by talking about something called 'scaling laws' This is the idea that making the models bigger automatically makes them smarter. But we're running out of high-quality human text to train on. And recent updates to models are demonstrably worse than older models. For copywriters and marketers, this means AI is a great brainstorming and drafting tool. But it can't replace the strategic thinking, empathy, and reliability of a human expert. 3. Zero Corporate ROI Even the corporations pushing this technology are realising it isn't the magic they were promised. A PwC survey of over 4,500 CEOs found that 56% of them have seen zero financial returns from implementing AI. And the rush to replace human workers with AI is already backfiring. Gartner predicts that by 2027, half the companies that fired workers to replace them with AI are going to have to hire those workers back. There's also massive quality control issues when AI is given too much autonomy. In April 2025, Microsoft announced that 30% of their code was being written by AI. Since that announcement, they've experienced more software failures than ever (like a windows 11 update that bricked devices). They literally appointed a new "Engineering Quality Head" to clean up the mess. 4. The business model isn't profitable These companies are literally subsidising the cost of AI to acquire normie users like yourself. They're running at a huge loss to get you hooked on cheap tools. But eventually they will have to raise prices insanely to survive. It's insanely expensive and uses up a ton of energy to power these LLMs. 5. The idea of 'Agentic AI' is a transhumanist psyop. Only god can create true consciousness/intelligence. You can't hold that belief while also believing that these heavily subsidized company's that are circling money between each other to stay alive are going to create an intelligent form. It's a probability based text generator that gets fed material from the internet and predicts the best answer to give you. It makes shit up. It hallucinates. People have been claiming to have cracked human level intelligence since computers first came out. Yann LeCun - the Chief AI Scientist at Meta and the guy who invented convolutional neural networks, which is the foundation of modern AI said publicly that the current architecture is reaching its peak. In his words its a dead end for achieving human-level intelligence. Final thoughts The markets are simply not reflecting reality right now. It's a weird time to be alive And for what its worth I am not 'Anti AI' or against using it. In fact - as some users pointed out on my original tweet - I have been using AI since 2022. I was playing around with it within a couple months of chat GPT release. By mid 2023 we were using it to deliver projects to clients at my agency. I was the first to sell an AI copywriting course (i think). We taught people how to prompt AI and copy chief it to deliver to the same level as a human copywriter in less time. OG followers/newsletter readers remember this. Yes this was a big leap in my business. We could write copy with more speed. I literally held off on a copywriter hire because my senior CW told me he could handle 3 more accounts as a result of AI. As of today I use AI within my business for the following: - Data analysis across 62+ accounts (we have strict QC systems to avoid hallucinations) - Forecasting revenue/profit across businesses - Modelling out my investments and networth - Organizing my thoughts - Writing copy - Market research for new copywriting projects (still, my biggest light bulb moments are from manual research that I feed to an LLM) - Scheduling campaigns/build automations for eCom clients (need to assess if its actually improved efficiency though) - it can take a designed asset and upload it to Klaviyo in HTML form and then schedule it to a corresponding segment with the right subject line and date - My designers use it a lot for image generation. But all those people still work for me lol. The difference is that I was writing 9,000 word VSLs before the average AI user was even introduced to the online marketing space... So me writing copy with AI vs you writing copy with AI will produce a completely different outcome. Plus - I still have 30 people working full time for me. They use AI to help them be more efficient. But their foundational skillset still dictates the quality they output. The ones with more attention to detail and more care produce better work, AI or not. The A players deliver before deadline and the B players deliver last minute. That will always be the case And that's not all The students in my private copywriting community use AI to produce: - Market research documents - Big ideas - Unique mechanisms - Entire funnels - Advertorials/VSLs/Sales letters - AD scripts - Long form statics - In-feed VSLs I actually think copywriting was the industry that benefitted the most from AI. And video/image generation too. But the demand for it hasn't reduced. We've gone from 28 clients -> 60+ in the last few months and its only increasing. If I don't cap our roster (I will) we'll have 100 clients within the next 90-120 days. The students in my community are closing clients every single day. If you're in eCom, you're probably desperate for creative strategists/cold traffic copywriters right now. Every single day there's new job posts from online business owners who are looking to hire copywriters and creative strategists. The notion that AI 'replaced' copywriters literally hasn't happened. Even though you've been told every year for the past 4 years that its coming. All it did was lower barrier to entry and lower the average in terms of skill level. My point is that AI is useful and definitely worth investing mindshare in. But most people are delusional about it and just want to seem like they're ahead of the curve by posting about it. At the end of the day the customer/client cares about the output, not the system you used to produce the output. I would be worried if I dropped everything to go all in on an AI slop offer like selling AI systems to businesses vs putting time into a real valuable career/skill

English
4
3
102
19.8K
Tim | ONLYUP™ 💹
Tim | ONLYUP™ 💹@timonlyup·
Don’t be an inspiration by talking inspirational words But by doing inspirational things
English
0
0
1
64
Tim | ONLYUP™ 💹
Tim | ONLYUP™ 💹@timonlyup·
Das ist totaler Wahnsinn. Ihr vereinfacht die Forschung und sprecht dann im Namen von Planck, Schwarzschild und Mykorrhiza-Forschern, als wäre das in ihrem Sinn. Fakt ist: Diese Wissenschaftler haben die Klimaphysik mit*begründet*. Schwarzschilds Strahlungstransfergleichung ist die mathematische Grundlage des Treibhauseffekts. Plancks Strahlungsgesetz steckt direkt in den Modellen drin. Arrhenius hat 1896 selbst eine Klimasensitivität von 4–5 °C berechnet, exakt der heutige IPCC-Bereich. Ihr stellt sie als Kronzeugen *gegen* das hin, was sie *begründet* haben. Das ist nicht Skepsis, das ist Verleumdung an Toten, die sich nicht mehr wehren können.Schämt euch. PS: Wenn ihr so clever seid, schreibt ein paper über DE-Klimaneutralität und holt euch sämtliche preise ab wenn ihr es ernst nehmt (alles berücksichtigen) werdet ihr allerdings beim best case irgendwo bei 50MT/ Jahr für die Flora landen
Deutsch
1
0
1
68
jobuartist💙
jobuartist💙@jobuartist·
Claude hat es genau errechnet.
jobuartist💙 tweet media
Deutsch
48
224
1.5K
60.1K
MrBeast
MrBeast@MrBeast·
Everyone on earth takes a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press? BE HONEST.
English
10.1K
3.3K
32.7K
41.5M