Gustav Tinghög

JediLab The Movie is here! soundtrack available at your local record shop. youtu.be/rD6GTKCBfHs?si… via @YouTube

feat. Jedi padawan @amandalinki Jedi knight @linakoppel, and Jedi master @DanielVastfjall

Is research ethics universal—or discipline-specific? Surveying 11,000+ researchers & ethics reviewers, we uncover systematic field differences in attitudes toward QRPs, with medical researchers the strictest. New @jedilab_liu paper out in Research Policy sciencedirect.com/science/articl…

New paper out! We examine urban–rural tensions in Sweden, testing whether place identities and resentment shape how people evaluate political statements.

#OpenAccess from @JEPS_ed - A Registered Report on Place-Based Resentment: Exploring Urban-Rural Tensions in Sweden - cup.org/4nSx6kf - Kajsa Hansson, Gissur Erlingsson & @tinghog #FirstView

@linakoppel @amandalinki 8/📄 Read the full open-access paper: doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo… 📂 Data + code: osf.io/qh4kc/ #AcademicTwitter #ScienceEthics #OpenScience

@linakoppel @amandalinki 7/ Researchers in psychology showed slightly lower normative dissonance than those in economics & business—especially on whether research should be judged on merit (universalism) or reputation (particularism). Albeit sample size was modest.

🔔 New paper alert! Scientists often juggle what’s best for science vs. their careers—a tradeoff between communitarian & individualistic ideals. We call this scientific normative dissonance. Study by @linakoppel @amandalinki maps it across academia: sciencedirect.com/science/articl… 🧵👇

People approach risky decisions differently when deciding for themselves than for others, the assumption goes. Research by @lewendm—with 3 samples of professional decision makers and a general one—finds ~no significant evidence this is the case (!) buff.ly/XreAU2b

@Humanpapers Misunderstanding was when subjects responded incorrectly to one or both comprehension questions shown in the screenshot in prevous comment

@tinghog @JoLohse Any endowment amount x such that x is whole and x = (0,100)? Or whole and x = [0,100]? "Between", strictly speaking, is the former, but can understandably be taken as the latter. Was this one of the issues? Or how was "misunderstanding" noticed?

Honestly, I think our new paper has serious implications for experimental econ 22–27% failed comprehension in the Dictator and Ultimatum games In the Trust Game and Public Goods Game, that number hit 70% and 52% These are foundational tools of exp econ doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo… 🧵

@JoLohse Sorry we should have referenced that paper. We tried our very very best to phrase the comprehension questions as straightforward as possible. Here is a screenshot of the instruction

@tinghog Interesting paper and mirrors the confusion rates we find for the PGG here: sciencedirect.com/science/articl… But thats a complicated game. I am wondering a bit how you can be confused about a dictator game? Are some people maybe confused about the confusion questions?

@WEK204686 Yes. one of the main critiques we’ve gotten is that researchers often use various (undocumented) "tricks of the trade" to boost comprehension. It would definitely be interesting to systematically collect and test how effective those tricks actually are

@tinghog Good paper. However, in my experience, participants learn very quickly when there are multiple iterations. Concluding anything from one-shot games always seemed dubious, but it would be interesting to test understanding after multiple rounds.

@szarka @sharmutal instagram.com/thecomprehensi…

@tinghog @sharmutal Maybe the paper should have an OnlyFans?

@sharmutal hmm it is published open access in Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization . If it gets more or less visitors than your onlyfans I don't know

@tinghog Are you going to publish the paper or just bury it in some academia only site that has fewer visitors than my onlyfans?

@sharmutal You clicked the link to the Open Science Framework where we have uploaded data, code and pre-registration. The actual paper is here: doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo…

@tinghog Really? Published on a 1989 website with "login to request access"? This doesn't count as publishing.

@Professologue do you mean if i believe misunderstanding is due to specific features of the games or a general tendencies for people to comprehend poorly?