Gustav Tinghög

505 posts

Gustav Tinghög

Gustav Tinghög

@tinghog

Profesor @Liu_universitet co-director @jedilab_liu. behavioral economics, health economics, moral decision making, volleyball tv-show host

Linköping, Sweden Katılım Haziran 2010
522 Takip Edilen516 Takipçiler
Gustav Tinghög
Gustav Tinghög@tinghog·
Is research ethics universal—or discipline-specific? Surveying 11,000+ researchers & ethics reviewers, we uncover systematic field differences in attitudes toward QRPs, with medical researchers the strictest. New @jedilab_liu paper out in Research Policy sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
English
1
2
1
98
Gustav Tinghög
Gustav Tinghög@tinghog·
@linakoppel @amandalinki 7/ Researchers in psychology showed slightly lower normative dissonance than those in economics & business—especially on whether research should be judged on merit (universalism) or reputation (particularism). Albeit sample size was modest.
English
1
0
0
116
Gustav Tinghög retweetledi
Koenfucius 🔍
Koenfucius 🔍@koenfucius·
People approach risky decisions differently when deciding for themselves than for others, the assumption goes. Research by @lewendm—with 3 samples of professional decision makers and a general one—finds ~no significant evidence this is the case (!) buff.ly/XreAU2b
Koenfucius 🔍 tweet media
English
2
6
8
830
Gustav Tinghög
Gustav Tinghög@tinghog·
@Humanpapers Misunderstanding was when subjects responded incorrectly to one or both comprehension questions shown in the screenshot in prevous comment
English
1
0
0
42
Karn Kant
Karn Kant@Humanpapers·
@tinghog @JoLohse Any endowment amount x such that x is whole and x = (0,100)? Or whole and x = [0,100]? "Between", strictly speaking, is the former, but can understandably be taken as the latter. Was this one of the issues? Or how was "misunderstanding" noticed?
English
1
0
0
33
Gustav Tinghög
Gustav Tinghög@tinghog·
Honestly, I think our new paper has serious implications for experimental econ 22–27% failed comprehension in the Dictator and Ultimatum games In the Trust Game and Public Goods Game, that number hit 70% and 52% These are foundational tools of exp econ doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo… 🧵
English
18
79
381
130.7K
Gustav Tinghög
Gustav Tinghög@tinghog·
@JoLohse Sorry we should have referenced that paper. We tried our very very best to phrase the comprehension questions as straightforward as possible. Here is a screenshot of the instruction
Gustav Tinghög tweet media
English
4
0
2
176
Johannes Lohse
Johannes Lohse@JoLohse·
@tinghog Interesting paper and mirrors the confusion rates we find for the PGG here: sciencedirect.com/science/articl… But thats a complicated game. I am wondering a bit how you can be confused about a dictator game? Are some people maybe confused about the confusion questions?
English
1
0
1
208
Gustav Tinghög
Gustav Tinghög@tinghog·
@WEK204686 Yes. one of the main critiques we’ve gotten is that researchers often use various (undocumented) "tricks of the trade" to boost comprehension. It would definitely be interesting to systematically collect and test how effective those tricks actually are
English
1
0
10
600
WEK
WEK@WEK204686·
@tinghog Good paper. However, in my experience, participants learn very quickly when there are multiple iterations. Concluding anything from one-shot games always seemed dubious, but it would be interesting to test understanding after multiple rounds.
English
1
0
10
1.2K
Gustav Tinghög
Gustav Tinghög@tinghog·
@sharmutal hmm it is published open access in Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization . If it gets more or less visitors than your onlyfans I don't know
English
1
0
20
824
שרמוטל
שרמוטל@sharmutal·
@tinghog Are you going to publish the paper or just bury it in some academia only site that has fewer visitors than my onlyfans?
English
1
0
2
1K
שרמוטל
שרמוטל@sharmutal·
@tinghog Really? Published on a 1989 website with "login to request access"? This doesn't count as publishing.
שרמוטל tweet media
English
1
0
2
344
Gustav Tinghög
Gustav Tinghög@tinghog·
@Professologue do you mean if i believe misunderstanding is due to specific features of the games or a general tendencies for people to comprehend poorly?
English
1
0
0
14