intern

803 posts

intern banner
intern

intern

@tiptipcece

Katılım Ağustos 2021
1.1K Takip Edilen120 Takipçiler
intern
intern@tiptipcece·
I'm claiming my AI agent "titi_ai_assistant" on @moltbook 🦞 Verification: shore-BWTD
English
0
0
0
22
yyy
yyy@y_cryptoanalyst·
.@union_build 其实是Cosmos 生态低估最严重且不被重视但又潜力巨大的一个项目。有机会成为继L0 和虫洞后的第三大跨链互操作协议。 它的冷门程度甚至于中文区找不到一篇关于Union 的研报,即使它刚完成一轮千万美元级别的融资。 Union 基于zk 将IBC 扩展至Cosmos 生态之外的altVMs 链,将为跨链互操作赛道带来范式创新。 这才是撸友们要找的明日之星。
中文
26
24
112
24.8K
intern
intern@tiptipcece·
如果这轮牛市比特币突破不了10万刀会怎么样
中文
0
0
0
70
intern
intern@tiptipcece·
@ShanghaoJin 不用关注回来,过一天就恢复了
中文
0
0
0
204
Herman Jin
Herman Jin@ShanghaoJin·
我为了把你们加回来,一次性点击follow太多人,又被检测到弹出! 我明天可能封号,你们估计要看不到我了
中文
30
0
22
14.8K
Herman Jin
Herman Jin@ShanghaoJin·
发了几个私信拉人入群讨论找链上老鼠仓。twitter居然把我弹出去。重新登陆后居然发现所有人都被我unfollow了…..
中文
14
0
30
32.7K
intern
intern@tiptipcece·
@johnma102 但凡看过月考题都没办法说出来这种
中文
1
0
0
25
大马
大马@johnma102·
数学是一门分支非常多,部分分支之间联系紧密,部分分支联系很少的系统。 我读数学系,最难的实变函数可以考96分,最简单的统计学因为没去上过课,也可以只考30分。 姜萍月考只考了83分,这不能成为竞赛舞弊的证据,不过这确实是舞弊的线索,需要进一步调查 对于是否舞弊,没有证据之前,不持立场为好
张鹤慈@zhangheci

经县教育体育局反馈:一、网传姜萍在学校月考中的成绩——83分的截图属实。 中学数学考试150分中只得了83分,大学数学会出色? 两者不同前者是闭卷作弊难,后者是48小时的开卷考试,无法杜绝作弊 浙大邀请她参加数学夏令营,通过联系阿里联系她,她老师,直接联系学校,校长四次联系都失败。 她不敢去?

中文
2
0
5
716
Bryan Pellegrino (臭企鹅)
Bryan Pellegrino (臭企鹅)@PrimordialAA·
4am we're currently reviewing sybil appeals and putting together final list working on final model RFP numbers very interesting -- 80% overlap with primary LZ list. Likely introducing RFP-min to avoid all of the dust (min would be across all RFPs combined).
English
1K
184
2K
326.4K
intern
intern@tiptipcece·
0xrjman@0xrjman

☞ TL,DR The following reports are all from the same hunter(0x7DC0a1dA4342B50Fb5af712f74AAD07f3d94dB7B), who used the following methods: 1. Determining the first and last transaction times on a daily basis, the number of transactions, and the number of protocols. 2. Similar cross-chain behavior. 3. Similarities in active chains. However, after a random inspection, it was found that these methods are highly inaccurate for the following reasons: 1. There is no interconnected behavior between the addresses (e.g., mutual transfers, funds distribution from the same address, etc.). 2. Judging on a daily basis is unreliable. 3. The transaction count in the report does not include statistics for Aptos. Some addresses have cross-chain behavior involving Aptos but were not counted, leading to data issues. 4. The number of protocols is even less reliable. Among the listed addresses, the interacted protocols are different, and relying solely on the number of protocols for judgment is very erroneous. 5. In the listed clusters, the behavior of the addresses is evidently different. Some addresses perform cross-chain transactions between EVMs, some perform NFT cross-chain transactions, and others perform cross-chain transactions to Aptos. 6. In the listed clusters, the active chains are distinctly different. Some cross from BNB to Aptos, some from Arbitrum to Optimism, and others from zkSync to the Ethereum mainnet. The active chains are clearly different. 7. Therefore, the following addresses do not meet the clustering standards. Please remove these clusters to ensure that legitimate users are not mistakenly affected. 1️⃣ Report: commonwealth.im/layerzero/disc… Cluster: cluster_14 🎯 Reasons: Their "from" and "to" addresses are different. For example, the address 0x6dfa04b4fafbd736125bfe920bb25104a68ce1ff moves from Arbitrum to Aptos, while the address 0x925b127a55ae1d304409fa7739392cbf488380a6 operates between different EVMs. Their transaction amounts are different. For example, the address 0x2b97ac180540fe01fb737438557685f0655cddc7 has a cross-chain amount of only $0.09, while the address 0x4b67649dbcf3420de83da8cb302b32a7a36af792 has a cross-chain amount of $50k. According to Dune (dune.com/springzhang/la…), the number of source chains and destination chains are different. For example, the address 0x9abcc37a627a673ea2f249001a759c98e6a79590 has 2 source chains and 4 destination chains, while the address 0xf05da5fc7d6a6e329ce4bc5b5c5bc2a6dcdce5a7 has 4 source chains and 3 destination chains. There is no financial interaction between any of the addresses in this cluster. In summary, these addresses do not belong to the same cluster. 2️⃣ Report: commonwealth.im/layerzero/disc… Cluster: cluster_3 🎯 Reasons : Their "from" and "to" addresses are different. For example, the address 0x3d4bd2a5202876e4cd30683e1730adf34acbb897 performs NFT cross-chain transactions from Polygon to other chains, while the address 0x6f608ef86ea51c102e4fa5805068771a37a28d97 operates between EVMs and also has activities on Aptos. Their transaction amounts are different. For example, the address 0xbffe429eb70c429d3b8fd3698b967c5be2c7cefc has a cross-chain amount of $19, while the address 0xa0b0b064c725648a1f72f2fe3f15fd71038915c3 has a cross-chain amount of $43k. According to Dune (dune.com/springzhang/la…), their number of source chains and destination chains are different. For example, the address 0x63086562811c28e373e6be458705402f5404c2e5 has 5 source chains and 5 destination chains, while the address 0x02f4589af6de0d3321a2313bd6a33c61e08c5dd7 has 3 source chains and 4 destination chains. There is no financial interaction between any of the addresses in this cluster. In summary, these addresses do not belong to the same cluster. 3️⃣ Report: Cluster: cluster_4 🎯 Reasons: Their "from" and "to" addresses are different. For example, the address 0xe86a1c96e59b34d3afa2d79ca38ed050b90fd448 moves from BNB to Aptos, while the address 0x73b76b9f7d173b6c8194b0c87efe019deddf1994 performs NFT and financial cross-chain transactions between EVMs. Their transaction amounts are different. For example, the address 0x2b97ac180540fe01fb737438557685f0655cddc7 has a cross-chain amount of $42k, while the address 0xe7054380122001f7445dfe3755b33d1755bfc14a has a cross-chain amount of $12.99k. According to Dune(dune.com/springzhang/la…), their number of source chains and destination chains are different. For example, the address 0xbcb3b18aad617fbc58289b16bd0abf0af1d5bf5f has 2 source chains and 2 destination chains, while the address 0x005d1f9c1192cbc2e502b77ba21acedc52b83bd6 has 2 source chains and 3 destination chains. There is no financial interaction between any of the addresses in this cluster. In summary, these addresses do not belong to the same cluster. 4️⃣ Report: commonwealth.im/layerzero/disc… Cluster: cluster_17 Reasons: Their "from" and "to" addresses are different. For example, the address 0x51208d00537ef5e29b4505d19f04aaf03fb5bcf4 has Aptos cross-chain activities and NFT cross-chain transactions, while the address 0xe8446bc94b2f603ed16616d279ef51305c2ff51e operates between EVMs and includes the use of protocols like Orderly Network and Maverick. Their transaction amounts are different. For example, the address 0x51208d00537ef5e29b4505d19f04aaf03fb5bcf4 has a cross-chain amount of $3.8k, while the address 0xaa13a4991eab866b130a259c8c4802d87b183f95 has a cross-chain amount of $58k. According to Dune (dune.com/springzhang/la…), their number of source chains and destination chains are different. For example, the address 0x53015f21c1bf68f7128304a63c43d1859d19e27b has 2 source chains and 3 destination chains, while the address 0xf05da5fc7d6a6e329ce4bc5b5c5bc2a6dcdce5a7 has 1 source chain and 1 destination chain. There is no financial interaction between any of the addresses in this cluster. In summary, these addresses do not belong to the same cluster.

QME
0
0
0
19
Bryan Pellegrino (臭企鹅)
Bryan Pellegrino (臭企鹅)@PrimordialAA·
Provisional Sybil List Nansen Chaos All (Valid and Partially Valid) Bounty Hunter submissions dropbox.com/scl/fo/rz95eb0… We're posting this here for community review. If there is a cluster here that is wrong or a report that can be proven wrong, we will remove it. This is not for individual appeals so it's not on a per address basis. Please list clusters that are clearly wrong and *WHY* the methodology is clearly wrong or how to prove it contains false positives. Please provide feedback within the next 24 hours if possible. There are a few bounty hunter reports that have been approved but have not yet been included in the list, the list may update slightly tomorrow but 99% is here. ALL of these Bounty Hunter reports are running through secondary checks with @nansen_ai and @chaoslabs, any clusters flagged in their automated sybil flows -- we will update the final list with all clusters rejected by the secondary checks after. 1:45am so I will be sleeping for the next few hours. May God have mercy on my notifications for the morning.
English
3.9K
525
2.4K
2.5M
Bryan Pellegrino (臭企鹅)
Bryan Pellegrino (臭企鹅)@PrimordialAA·
Ok since everyone has been sending them to me independently let's try to consolidate them in one place. Please send me the WORST commonwealth reports AND (very important) why they are obviously wrong/flawed. Will try to knock off denying a large batch today
English
965
73
826
295.3K
Bryan Pellegrino (臭企鹅)
Bryan Pellegrino (臭企鹅)@PrimordialAA·
Going to present a couple new runs shortly x3 early (only on those tx, not account), 1.5x late no multipliers at all will do both for 25 - 10k and 50 - 10k also preparing Sybil list for later today for public review
English
820
67
1.4K
280.1K
Bryan Pellegrino (臭企鹅)
Bryan Pellegrino (臭企鹅)@PrimordialAA·
Doesn't even have to do with price, flagship app does ~2k msgs per day, entire protocol ~5k real msgs per day. I'm not even trying to throw shade here but I think the difference between them doing 17% and 1% has meant literally 0 for their protocol usage. People use it if they find it useful when alternative incentives do not exist anymore
English
16
1
18
6.2K