HR

I'm sick of refreshing my email. SEND THE OFFER LETTER

Its a tragedy that so many Muslim women, and even some men, view the idea of a man marrying for physical desire as something "ugly" or "shameful." How can we disparage something that our Lord, the Almighty, is pleased with and rewards us for? While a woman’s primary motivation for marriage often centers on seeking emotional fulfillment, containment, and a protector who provides security and care, she also has physical needs. However, in women, this is often beautifully wrapped in Haya and tied to love. As for a man, one of the strongest drivers toward marriage is his physical desire. No matter how much a man might try to sugarcoat it, any man who is honest with himself, who lowers his gaze from the Haram and guards his chastity, knows that this instinct is a primary push toward completing his Deen. As الله says: "It is He who created you from one soul and created from it its mate that he might dwell in security (seek rest) with her." Imam al-Tabari, Imam Al-Mufasireen, explained "dwell in security" as: to seek her out for the fulfillment of his needs and pleasure. And الله also says: "And of His signs is that He created for you from yourselves mates that you may find tranquility in them; and He placed between you affection and mercy." Imam al-Qurtubi Commented on this verse: “It is said: the origin of man is from the earth, and within him is the nature of the earth. Within him is the organ from which his creation began, and thus he is in need of repose. The woman was created as a source of repose for the man. الله, Most High, says: ‘And among His signs is that He created you from dust,’ and He says: ‘And among His signs is that He created for you, from yourselves, spouses that you may find tranquility in them.’ The first manner in which a man benefits from a woman is that he finds calm in her, settling the agitation within him. For when that faculty is stirred, the fluid of the loins is drawn toward it, and in her he finds rest, and through her he is relieved of that agitation. And for men was created from them that which fulfills this need.” In an age of fitna like ours, a young man who guards his chastity and remains patient until الله eases the way for marriage is a righteous person who sacrificed his immediate desires for the sake of الله. But today, fitra has been clouded. Hollywood, Korean dramas, feminist rhetoric, and social media have programmed minds to see the beautiful as ugly and the ugly as beautiful, leaving people confused even about their own Deen. I cannot help but share these Ahadith that clarify the virtue of this path: The Prophet ﷺ said: ‘And in the sexual act of one of you there is charity.’ They said, ‘O Messenger of الله, does one of us fulfill his desire and still have a reward in it?’ He said, ‘Do you not see that if he were to place it in the unlawful, he would bear a sin? Likewise, if he places it in the lawful, he will have a reward.’” (Reported by Sahih Muslim) This is explicit and clear: fulfilling one’s desire in what is Halal is rewarded. And whatever الله rewards, He is pleased with. So how can a created being deem ugly what the Creator has made pleasing and Halal for us? The Prophet ﷺ said: ‘O young men, whoever among you is able to marry, let him marry, for it is more effective in lowering the gaze and guarding the private parts. And whoever is not able, then let him fast, for it will be a shield for him.’” (Agreed upon by Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim) The meaning is clear. The best of creation, our noble Prophet ﷺ, encouraged marriage and called to it as a means of preserving chastity and guarding oneself from Haram. His statement, “and whoever is not able, then let him fast,” shows that fasting is a means of chastity, as it weakens the force of desire and helps lower the gaze. It is a means of protection. So marriage was encouraged in order to protect one’s chastity from haram and to fulfill desire in Halal. The Prophet ﷺ also said: ‘Three have a right upon Allah that He aids them… and the one who marries seeking chastity.’” (Reported by Jami` at-Tirmidhi) Here again, its made unmistakably clear that intending marriage for the sake of chastity and guarding oneself from Haram is a righteous intention, one that earns reward, and for which الله grants His aid. The Prophet ﷺ said: ‘If one of you is attracted to a woman and something enters his heart, then let him go to his wife and have relations with her, for that will repel what is within him.’” (Reported by Sahih Muslim) This shows one of the great benefits of marriage. If a man feels desire toward a woman who is haram for him, he should go to his wife, for in fulfilling his desire in what is Halal, that feeling is repelled and removed. Our Deen is clear in this matter. So don't let anyone make ugly for you what الله has made beautiful and Halal. All praise is for الله, who created us and knows us best, and who, out of His mercy, created for us spouses from among ourselves so that we may find tranquility in them. I ask الله to grant every single Muslim man a spouse, and to provide those who have one wife with a second, a third, and a fourth.

I am of the mindset now that the whole “the Iranian government slaughtered tens of thousands of Iranians” might be mostly (if not largely or entirely) propaganda. And I am willing to admit that I initially fell for it.

@MrWinMarshall You’re so bland, go back to playing the banjo

UK Vs Hungary: Mass Migration Myth

What the fuck. What The Fuck. WHAT THE FUCK. This is exactly what the Nazis did.

STOP DISHONOURING EACH OTHER! Muslims will debate theology for centuries. Free will vs. divine decree. The attributes of Allah. Profound disagreement. Tolerated. And in some cases, celebrated as scholarly rigor. But dare to read a geopolitical situation differently, and suddenly you are a traitor. The name calling crosses sacred redlines: The honour of a believer. There is ikhtilaf (valid differences) in matters of eternal consequence. And there is supposedly no room for it in probabilistic political judgments made on: Incomplete data, fragmented narratives, and competing claims. Someone explain the logic. Because theology concerns ultimate reality. Politics, in most cases, concerns contingent assessment. Limited information. Many variables. Sincere people, valid reasoning, different conclusions. If difference is legitimate in the more foundational domain, how does it become betrayal in the more uncertain one? What this usually reveals is not principled Islamic epistemology. It is ego dressed as conviction. Partisanship performing as certainty. The inability to distinguish between holding a position firmly and treating all other positions as kufr-adjacent. Yes, theology shapes politics. Creed informs how we read the world. Acknowledged fully. But there is still a distinction between foundational theological truth and probabilistic political judgment made under conditions of uncertainty. Collapsing that distinction is not strength. It is an epistemological error. The inconsistency is telling. Ikhtilaf in aqidah: scholarly tradition. Ikhtilaf in geopolitics: betrayal of the ummah. That asymmetry deserves serious reflection. Because what drives it is rarely love of truth. P.s. For those with poor comprehension skills, this obviously cannot be applied to Israel’s and Zionism’s evil. I thought I’d mention this just in case.

@SpiritofourLord @GodLogic_GL Christians: Islam is a satanic religion Also Christians: the Quran affirms the bible

@GodLogic_GL Islam is a Satanic religion straight from the pit of hell.

You won't want to miss this one youtube.com/watch?v=Ee9R4t…

Western institutions only figured this out once oil got expensive

Jewish troops will be looking for Muslims hidden in the attics of Christians. Let that sink in.

I hereby rule that Iran has the best, most loyal, justice-loving, sophisticated, wise, genuinely patriotic political leadership in the whole world. They are the envy of every nation, and set the standard for all of humanity to follow. Iran is a class apart

Crimes against humanity.

It's on a monkey called Punch that the world unites to have empathy, but a fellow human being is where we draw the line.

The same people demanding that you acknowledge “Israel’s right to exist” have also defended the systematic annihilation of Palestine, Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, Libya, and Iran as well as the demographic genocide against Europe. Israel is apparently the only nation that can exist.

Bibi didn’t just find Hamas. Israeli govt also funded Al Nusrat and various other “Muslim” militant groups that mass slaughter Christians around the world. They blame Muslims for the terrorism that they fund so they have an excuse to start wars, and steal land and resources.

LOVE IS REAL! LIFE IS WORTH LIVING!

Why is Epstein’s trafficking network never framed as a “Jewish trafficking ring”, while crimes by others are so readily racialised or religiously labelled?

It is submission to God (Islam) vs. evil (submission to other than God). It is not that complicated. Pick a side.

I’m officially starting the Goyim Defense League (GDL) to combat anti-goyimism. Let’s face it: Anti-goyimism is on the rise and as of recent it has caused significant trauma on our special, non-pedophilic community. Goyim no longer feel safe to celebrate their Goyhood. This is a problem. So to my beautiful Goyish people, it’s time to stand UP. It’s time we DEFEND what is OURS. We MUST band together to smash the evil Goyhaters! If you want to join the GDL, drop some foreskin 🍄‍🟫 in the comments.

“The ideology of "Jewish supremacy," which has become dominant in the Israeli government, reminds one of the Nazi racial theory” - so says ex Israeli defense minister and ex head of the IDF Moshe Yaalon. If he said this on a US college campus, he’d be accused of antisemitism per the IHRA definition of antisemitism.

By portraying Muslims as pedophiles and groomers, Musk and the far right scapegoated a community to deflect attention from their own misconduct. Musk was involved with the biggest grooming gang om earth in the last 100 years led by the Zionist Epstein.