Tony Servera

Même IKEA ne respecte plus rien...

@kaizen000000000 Stupidity is believing without questioning... You are less stupid than religious and dogmatic people. But still. It's not over. You're still believing in materialism, atheism, physicalism and scientism. Don't believe without questioning. Don't be stupid please.

@kaizen000000000 You're the fact, you're the evidence. It's really simple. You believe to be something you're not. Because you believe that you're human, you cannot see that you're a mind. The mind of God.

Not knowing there is God is 1000x more logical than being 100% certain that there is a god with only faith and no facts

@NygmaNolan @Atomsmade It's not "my" philosophy. Nonduality is not only shared in christianism (mysticism actually, the esoteric path of this particular tradition) Jesus was enlightened. Enlightenment is not something unreachable for other human beings.

@tony_servera @Atomsmade Fair enough, but you are quoting the Bible to support your view. "The Father and I are one" refers to being one in purpose, not a lack of duality. By calling the flesh an illusion, you are rewriting the narrative to fit your philosophy.

But this is all it took to finish your god.

@NygmaNolan @Atomsmade "The Father and I, we're one" He was very direct, he was talking about non duality. I don't need to go into all the details of a book to experience Reality from a nondual approach.

@NygmaNolan @Atomsmade Flesh is an illusion. It's Consciousness. Blood, bones, joints, flesh? It the same material: Consciousness itself. The spirit he was talking about...

@JohnnySlokes2 @Danish_SMF And I'm not anti-Science at all, quite the opposite. Pointing the limits of a system doesn't mean you're against it. It's just how we should use your intelligence, to become more conscious, not more dogmatic.

@JohnnySlokes2 @Danish_SMF I agree. Many atheists, scientists and rational people are not "skeptical" in a real traditional sense. They use Science as an Absolute without the epistemic responsibility to recognise the biases and flaws of the method itself.

What testable difference does your God make in the world? If none, then your ontology is just wordplay. Evidence first. Jargon second.

@Danish_SMF Stop wasting your time arguing with religious people. Yes, they're deluded and ignorant for the most part. They "believe" out of conformism, without the awareness of the difference between "actual reality" and a "belief". Don't fall into the same traps.

@Danish_SMF You need to understand that we're talking about something serious here. It's not that simple. If you really care about Truth, you'll have to investigate with a rigorous approach.

@kaizen000000000 Who is the "self" you're talking about? :D

Once you accept there’s no sky fairies, you’ve reached true freedom and self-reliance