trianglestomache

Ulises Fernando Bernal Miramontes, es el nombre del tipo que hizo burlas racistas a una aficionada coreana. Presidente del colegio de ingenieros topográficos de Jalisco. La inmensa mayoría de los mexicanos repudiamos estos actos

The Japanese Chamber of Commerce and Industry in China recently held a press conference. They complained that although the Chinese government's rare earth restrictions are supposedly only targeting Japan's dual-use (civilian and military) companies, Japanese civilian companies — after submitting their applications — have been waiting a very long time without receiving any approval from China's review authorities. As a result, Japanese civilian companies can't actually get rare earths either. Haha, this looks familiar. Before Xi came to power, the Chinese government—especially at the grassroots level—was oftenly like this: corrupt and intentionally inefficient. When the ordinary Chinese applied something, they'd keep finding all kinds of excuses to drag things out until you bribed them. My suggestion for the Japanese today is that they could try bribing the officials at China's Ministry of Commerce. Give it a shot—who knows, it might work? Of course, if it doesn't, those Japanese will get arrested for bribery. lol. But joking aside, here's my real suggestion for Japanese companies: they could relocate their rare earth-dependent factories from Japan to China. By producing rare earth-dependent components right here in China, they could still supply the U.S. market — and Trump would have nothing to complain about. And I'd suggest they do this quickly — otherwise, Chinese companies will seize the opportunity created by Japan's supply disruption and take over that market share.

China responded coldly to questions about the sanctions on the Philippine defense minister. Good. This is exactly why Chinese people find Teodoro disgusting. Territorial disputes are one thing. But the Philippines under people like him has turned itself into something much uglier: begging China for fuel, fertilizer, and assistance when it needs help, then smearing China the moment it wants to perform loyalty for Washington, while openly embracing Japan — the same imperial Japan that invaded, occupied, and massacred Filipinos. Bataan Death March. Japanese occupation. Manila massacre. That was Filipino blood. And now Manila’s defense chief wants to polish Japan’s return to militarism while calling China the threat? This has crossed the line of basic human ethics. He is not “upholding the nation.” This is political theater by a man using anti-China hysteria to buy relevance from the U.S. and Japan. He takes aid when convenient. He bites the hand when useful. He invites outside powers into the region. He internationalizes disputes. He smears China nonstop. Then he cries when China finally sanctions him. Colonial pets in dog collars often mistake provoking China for diplomacy. So they beg in the morning, bark in the afternoon, and pretend to be statesmen at night. Beijing is not playing these low-down games with them. China simply did what any serious major power should do: Sanction him.

A Korean fan was filming herself at the World Cup when a group of Mexico supporters behind her started pulling their eyes into a slant and laughing at her. Social media tracked the main guy down. He's reportedly the president of Jalisco's college of surveyors….

A Korean fan was filming herself at the World Cup when a group of Mexico supporters behind her started pulling their eyes into a slant and laughing at her. Social media tracked the main guy down. He's reportedly the president of Jalisco's college of surveyors….

The irony is that the U.S. and India are "Major Defense Partners," conduct joint military exercises and cooperate across the Indo-Pacific. Yet the U.S. Navy has launched missile strikes against commercial tankers in international waters and killed Indian merchant mariners. The U.S. Navy had direct communications with the crews of the three foreign-flagged commercial tankers and was fully aware of their Indian nationality before launching the strikes that killed three crew members this week. This echoes March, when the U.S. Navy torpedoed and sank, in India's backyard, an Iranian frigate returning in a non-combat configuration after largely expending its munitions during an India-hosted multilateral naval exercise in which the U.S. also participated. And just as the U.S. Navy did not attempt to rescue the sailors from the sinking frigate, it likewise did not come to the aid of the surviving Indian crew members aboard the three tankers it struck. The rescue efforts were mounted instead by Omani authorities. It is noteworthy that the vessels Washington labels part of a "shadow fleet" transporting crude oil are largely linked to China and Russia. Yet since the Trump-ordered naval blockade began on April 13 without any basis in international law, the U.S. military has not struck a single tanker actively bound for, or coming directly from, either China or Russia. Striking such a vessel would transform a localized naval blockade into a direct geopolitical confrontation with Beijing or Moscow — a line the Trump administration has explicitly avoided crossing. Instead, it has employed kinetic force only against lower-profile vessels, including those carrying Indian crew members. Taken together, these incidents are a sad commentary on the state of India's foreign policy under the present government.

The irony is that the U.S. and India are "Major Defense Partners," conduct joint military exercises and cooperate across the Indo-Pacific. Yet the U.S. Navy has launched missile strikes against commercial tankers in international waters and killed Indian merchant mariners. The U.S. Navy had direct communications with the crews of the three foreign-flagged commercial tankers and was fully aware of their Indian nationality before launching the strikes that killed three crew members this week. This echoes March, when the U.S. Navy torpedoed and sank, in India's backyard, an Iranian frigate returning in a non-combat configuration after largely expending its munitions during an India-hosted multilateral naval exercise in which the U.S. also participated. And just as the U.S. Navy did not attempt to rescue the sailors from the sinking frigate, it likewise did not come to the aid of the surviving Indian crew members aboard the three tankers it struck. The rescue efforts were mounted instead by Omani authorities. It is noteworthy that the vessels Washington labels part of a "shadow fleet" transporting crude oil are largely linked to China and Russia. Yet since the Trump-ordered naval blockade began on April 13 without any basis in international law, the U.S. military has not struck a single tanker actively bound for, or coming directly from, either China or Russia. Striking such a vessel would transform a localized naval blockade into a direct geopolitical confrontation with Beijing or Moscow — a line the Trump administration has explicitly avoided crossing. Instead, it has employed kinetic force only against lower-profile vessels, including those carrying Indian crew members. Taken together, these incidents are a sad commentary on the state of India's foreign policy under the present government.

The irony is that the U.S. and India are "Major Defense Partners," conduct joint military exercises and cooperate across the Indo-Pacific. Yet the U.S. Navy has launched missile strikes against commercial tankers in international waters and killed Indian merchant mariners. The U.S. Navy had direct communications with the crews of the three foreign-flagged commercial tankers and was fully aware of their Indian nationality before launching the strikes that killed three crew members this week. This echoes March, when the U.S. Navy torpedoed and sank, in India's backyard, an Iranian frigate returning in a non-combat configuration after largely expending its munitions during an India-hosted multilateral naval exercise in which the U.S. also participated. And just as the U.S. Navy did not attempt to rescue the sailors from the sinking frigate, it likewise did not come to the aid of the surviving Indian crew members aboard the three tankers it struck. The rescue efforts were mounted instead by Omani authorities. It is noteworthy that the vessels Washington labels part of a "shadow fleet" transporting crude oil are largely linked to China and Russia. Yet since the Trump-ordered naval blockade began on April 13 without any basis in international law, the U.S. military has not struck a single tanker actively bound for, or coming directly from, either China or Russia. Striking such a vessel would transform a localized naval blockade into a direct geopolitical confrontation with Beijing or Moscow — a line the Trump administration has explicitly avoided crossing. Instead, it has employed kinetic force only against lower-profile vessels, including those carrying Indian crew members. Taken together, these incidents are a sad commentary on the state of India's foreign policy under the present government.

The irony is that the U.S. and India are "Major Defense Partners," conduct joint military exercises and cooperate across the Indo-Pacific. Yet the U.S. Navy has launched missile strikes against commercial tankers in international waters and killed Indian merchant mariners. The U.S. Navy had direct communications with the crews of the three foreign-flagged commercial tankers and was fully aware of their Indian nationality before launching the strikes that killed three crew members this week. This echoes March, when the U.S. Navy torpedoed and sank, in India's backyard, an Iranian frigate returning in a non-combat configuration after largely expending its munitions during an India-hosted multilateral naval exercise in which the U.S. also participated. And just as the U.S. Navy did not attempt to rescue the sailors from the sinking frigate, it likewise did not come to the aid of the surviving Indian crew members aboard the three tankers it struck. The rescue efforts were mounted instead by Omani authorities. It is noteworthy that the vessels Washington labels part of a "shadow fleet" transporting crude oil are largely linked to China and Russia. Yet since the Trump-ordered naval blockade began on April 13 without any basis in international law, the U.S. military has not struck a single tanker actively bound for, or coming directly from, either China or Russia. Striking such a vessel would transform a localized naval blockade into a direct geopolitical confrontation with Beijing or Moscow — a line the Trump administration has explicitly avoided crossing. Instead, it has employed kinetic force only against lower-profile vessels, including those carrying Indian crew members. Taken together, these incidents are a sad commentary on the state of India's foreign policy under the present government.

The irony is that the U.S. and India are "Major Defense Partners," conduct joint military exercises and cooperate across the Indo-Pacific. Yet the U.S. Navy has launched missile strikes against commercial tankers in international waters and killed Indian merchant mariners. The U.S. Navy had direct communications with the crews of the three foreign-flagged commercial tankers and was fully aware of their Indian nationality before launching the strikes that killed three crew members this week. This echoes March, when the U.S. Navy torpedoed and sank, in India's backyard, an Iranian frigate returning in a non-combat configuration after largely expending its munitions during an India-hosted multilateral naval exercise in which the U.S. also participated. And just as the U.S. Navy did not attempt to rescue the sailors from the sinking frigate, it likewise did not come to the aid of the surviving Indian crew members aboard the three tankers it struck. The rescue efforts were mounted instead by Omani authorities. It is noteworthy that the vessels Washington labels part of a "shadow fleet" transporting crude oil are largely linked to China and Russia. Yet since the Trump-ordered naval blockade began on April 13 without any basis in international law, the U.S. military has not struck a single tanker actively bound for, or coming directly from, either China or Russia. Striking such a vessel would transform a localized naval blockade into a direct geopolitical confrontation with Beijing or Moscow — a line the Trump administration has explicitly avoided crossing. Instead, it has employed kinetic force only against lower-profile vessels, including those carrying Indian crew members. Taken together, these incidents are a sad commentary on the state of India's foreign policy under the present government.

菲律宾因防长特奥多罗不当言论，在 7.9 级强震后陷入求助无门的困境。 特奥多罗不当言论：2024 年新加坡香会期间，菲律宾国防部长特奥多罗称中国今年 3 月提供的 15 万吨尿素、26 万桶柴油是 “包装和欺骗外交糖衣”，还表示中国援助不会改变菲律宾。 中方制裁与援助态度：中国外交部宣布对特奥多罗及其亲属实施制裁，且未对菲律宾此次地震提供实质性物资支援。 菲律宾地震灾情：菲律宾棉兰老岛发生 7.9 级强震，已造成 53 人死亡，8642 所学校停课，数十万人流离失所，超 400 万学生无法正常上课。 菲求助无门现状：菲律宾总统小马科斯四处求救，美国、日本仅作口头慰问，未提供实质援助。