double t

@95KeepPounding We can't do anything right anymore.

@robgoldbergo @CElder556 @charlescwcooke He's also not a Democrat, and didn't like the Mueller Report, or the subsequent impeachment. But this asshole doesn't care about any of that. He wants to fight. Anyone, everyone. He thinks the world owes him something he never got and he's pissed.

@CElder556 @tthrush14 @charlescwcooke I don’t think the guy you’re talking to is actually Chris Farley

The president should not do this. There are no exceptions to that rule.

@BeenFarming @CElder556 @charlescwcooke That's right. It's one of the oldest rules in the damn book: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. He's dead. Punching a corpse is about the weakest tough guy act I can imagine.

@tthrush14 @CElder556 @charlescwcooke Who cares? Targeting incoming NSA for telling Russia not to get in a pissing match. Taking Clinton foreign collusion and targeting Trump for foreign collusion. Illegally monitoring his campaign using Clinton bunk as the basis. But don’t acknowledge mueller as trash?

@CElder556 @charlescwcooke Every single thing except "I'm glad he's dead." Hell, show me where JB or BO said "Too bad he missed" about the PA attempt. We're not talking about "the left" or "the right." We're talking about the President of the United States. It's not politics. It's fucking human decency.

You clearly didn't read what I wrote, fats. I'm saying IDGAF about your bullshit rules that you stupid fat loser trash NPCs are trying to make us live by that you don't live by yourself. You've spent 10 years throwing every single bowl of shit at Trump your chubby little hands could pick up and now you're mad that he threw one turd back at you? Fuck off.

@CElder556 @charlescwcooke Show me a statement from a Democrat POTUS that says "I'm glad he's dead" about a fellow American. Just one. Go ahead. Any time you're ready, just put it on the table. Any time now. Come on, I'm sure you have stacks of them after 10+ years. Let's see one. Just one. Only one time.

@charlescwcooke Democrats have spent every second of their miserable, pathetic, trash existence since 2015 incinerating every social and political norm in their Quixotic, kamikaze NPC cult attacks on Trump and now I'm supposed to care about "muh rules?" DGAF now, and won't tomorrow, either.

@Podrivel @mdubowitz I'm perfectly aware the United States was involved in Mossadegh's overthrow. But it was not as simple as a "coup against a democratic government." MM worked just as hard to suppress opposition as the Shah, and bent/broke just as many rules to consolidate power.

@tthrush14 @mdubowitz I'll happily refer you to the swath of released intelligence documents on the topic. Or if you're not the reading type, here is a documentary that might shine some light on the subject. youtu.be/V3BC4TVP_tA?is…

Joint statement from the leaders of 🇬🇧 🇫🇷 🇩🇪 🇮🇹 🇳🇱 🇯🇵 🇨🇦 🇰🇷 🇳🇿 🇩🇰 🇱🇻 🇸🇮 🇪🇪 🇳🇴 🇸🇪 🇫🇮 🇨🇿 🇷🇴 🇧🇭 🇱🇹 on the Strait of Hormuz: We condemn in the strongest terms recent attacks by Iran on unarmed commercial vessels in the Gulf, attacks on civilian infrastructure including oil and gas installations, and the de facto closure of the Strait of Hormuz by Iranian forces. We express our deep concern about the escalating conflict. We call on Iran to cease immediately its threats, laying of mines, drone and missile attacks, and other attempts to block the Strait to commercial shipping, and to comply with United Nations Security Council Resolution 2817. Freedom of navigation is a fundamental principle of international law, including under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. The effects of Iran’s actions will be felt by people in all parts of the world, especially the most vulnerable. Consistent with UNSC Resolution 2817, we emphasise that such interference with international shipping and disruption of global energy supply chains constitute a threat to international peace and security. In this regard, we call for an immediate comprehensive moratorium on attacks on civilian infrastructure, including oil and gas installations. We express our readiness to contribute to appropriate efforts to ensure safe passage through the Strait. We welcome the commitment of nations engaging in preparatory planning. We welcome the International Energy Agency decision to authorise a coordinated release of strategic petroleum reserves. We will take further steps to stabilise energy markets, including working with producing nations to increase output. We will also work to support the most affected countries, including through the United Nations and the international financial institutions. Maritime security and freedom of navigation benefit all countries. We call on all states to respect international law and uphold the fundamental principles of international prosperity and security.

@Podrivel @mdubowitz "Democratically elected"

@Podrivel @mdubowitz Not really what happened but keep saying it and it might become true. (It won't but lots of people believe lots of lies.)

@pegobry_en @RexStructorum Iran did attack the US. 11/4/1979. They should have been dealt with immediately. They're being dealt with now. Better late than never.

@RexStructorum China attacking the US or Russia invading Poland falls under Article 5 of the NATO treaty. A unilateral attack against Iran doesn’t.

Utterly, completely baffled by the notion that the US could wake up one day and launch a massive regional war, purely unilaterally without at any point consulting allies, and a week later be like "Join the war now" and said allies should be expected to snap to attention and commit their troops to said war. I am pretty sure this has never ever happened in human history and that no alliance has ever worked like this. Just utterly deranged. And this is still true even if the war is a very good idea! To take a couple obvious examples: - In the run-up to the Iraq War, some European countries (very wisely) opted to abstain, other countries opted to join. If instead of engaging in a multi-month diplomatic campaign to make their case the Bush Administration had taken an opportunity to effect a decapitation strike, the number of countries that would have joined would have been a big fat zero, for very obvious reasons. - In the run-up to World War II, France repeatedly intended to go to war to stop Hitler before it was too late. And each time they tried to get their ally Britain onboard, and each time Britain said no. If France had acted unilaterally—which they should have—and then demanded Britain join the war, Britain would have told them to buzz off, for very obvious reasons. Note I’m picking an example where the unilateral war against the rising threat to stability is THE RIGHT CALL. But it still would have been the case that the UK would not have joined, and nobody would have expected them to. Just insane insane mindset.

@Podrivel @mdubowitz Iran declared war on the United States almost 50 years ago.

@mdubowitz So let's all blame Iran and not the countries who started the war...

@OVTweetmarck MAKING A DEEP RUN IS NOT THE F---ING POINT OF THIS ENTERPRISE!

Auburn and Oklahoma should have won more games.

@OVTweetmarck William Shatner is in his 90s.

Chuck Norris was one of those guys that was way older than I first thought.

@OVTweetmarck Success in business is all lawyer's tricks, man. Surely you of all people know that!

The average person, by my estimation, and God bless them, thinks an attorney is essentially a wizard.

"Hey, you're an attorney, can you provide me guidance on how to operate my business that you have no experience in?" ...no?

@OVTweetmarck Final score Norris 8,650 - Death 1 Rest well, Mr. Norris. Job well done.

@johnondrasik Yes! Top teams playing on some random court somewhere. Magical stuff. They've sucked the soul right out of the early rounds.

When college Bball was great.

@TonerousHyus The thing people constantly forget: winning a primary does not mean a candidate is widely popular. He won with 1.2M votes. In the last Texas midterm Senate election, he would've needed four times that total to win. That was 8 years ago, so it might take 5 times that now.

Talarico is like Walz. He codes as “moderate” and masculine the way upper class white women feel most comfortable with masculinity. Which is being completely weak, feckless, and talking about how “Jesus heckin loves migrants and abortion” It’s just poison for real people

@ingelramdecoucy Shit, make it half.

Me, looking to get completely shitfaced: “I’ll have what he’s having, make it a double”

@ingelramdecoucy "Drones" is a pretty vague term.

Feel like we need to be keeping more of an eye on Czechia, they’re clearly up to something

@ProFootballTalk College teams in particular - they have 105-man rosters and there are only 101 numbers available (counting 0 and 00)

The effort to get Matt Leinart to allow his USC number to be unretired proves yet again that teams should never retire numbers -- if they aren't prepared to permanently honor the gesture. nbcsports.com/nfl/profootbal…

@ratlpolicy You suppose these "real hardliners" will overthrow the king, sack the US Embassy, and embark upon a five decade war of attrition against American interests around the world? That seems like it would be bad.

The whole claim that "now the REAL hardliners are in charge" is nonsense. They're all hardliners. At some point, the marginal degree of radicalism doesn't matter. And we reached that point decades ago. This is all a ploy to invent a failure that doesn't actually exist.

@GeologyKyle @avidseries I think you never actually listened to Rush Limbaugh.

@avidseries I think Rush Limbaugh played a major role in conservative discourse losing quality imo

The conservative discourse I enjoyed as a teenager featured people like Alan Bloom, William F. Buckley, George Will and Thomas Sowell. Not the kind of people likely to be reduced to internecine spats featuring insults like "Micropenis Mark."