Twice Removed

Thanks for all the kind farewells! And a happy Father's Day to all the nonagenarian secret dads out there #episodeGuid=9dbebd04-51d9-11e7-b73f-af05f8a19203" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/twi…

Our final episode: A 93-year-old man takes a DNA test... and everything changes #episodeGuid=9dbebd04-51d9-11e7-b73f-af05f8a19203" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/twi…

Hey, Everyone – Some news:

Our friends @lowlandhum (who wrote/performed the story of Lydia and Barnabas) have a new album out. It is great: open.spotify.com/album/7z3uh23K…

@LBlenkinsop pick it up! You've got four more episodes to go! (Also, thanks!)

I'm on the James Altucher Show talking about how to avoid total despair (partial despair is my new life goal!) jamesaltucher.com/2017/02/aj-jac…

Thanks! Also, the first 53 minutes are pretty good too 😉 twitter.com/gcbrianne/stat…

Hey, thanks! twitter.com/AlmondMilkHote…

Listen here! itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/twi… twitter.com/juliaedits/sta…

At #RootsTech? Need something to listen to walking between hotel and conference? We've got you covered itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/twi…

@stevechris not this year! Taking a much needed post-season break. Spread the word on our behalf? Thanks for listening!

@twiceremoved is amazing. Just listened to the first episode featuring the fabulous @fakedansavage. So beautiful, almost cried. I'm hooked.

@abaranov 👌

@SarahKeelerB thank you!

Hey fam! If you have just a minute, please tell us what you think of the show! gimlet.typeform.com/to/gamWfB

I'm now hooked on @ajjacobs' Twice Removed p'cast. It's awesome: history lessons, great storytelling, a surprise reveal. Good for your ears.

@nprmonkeysee Thank you so much. The feeling is mutual.

@nprmonkeysee Will report back if we think of something! We're lucky to have guests as open and honest as wordsmith @JeanGreasy

@nprmonkeysee And putting a content warning on the top of every show is annoying as f**k for everyone

@nprmonkeysee Doesn't completely address what you're saying, which makes a lot of sense. Labeling explicit falls into the same problem