akshatha

771 posts

akshatha banner
akshatha

akshatha

@ughkshatha2

amarula fruit cream enthusiast

Katılım Mart 2024
261 Takip Edilen334 Takipçiler
akshatha
akshatha@ughkshatha2·
@GandharvrajG X! Literally that one twt I get you can't comment No reason
English
0
0
1
29
akshatha
akshatha@ughkshatha2·
BRO i just wanna comment on bestfriends tweet why wouldn't you let me do that 😭😭😭
English
1
0
5
89
akshatha
akshatha@ughkshatha2·
@vid_sushi it's either that or j bec that's half the stuff we engage w 😭
English
0
0
1
14
Vidushi
Vidushi@vid_sushi·
convinced they’re gonna open a din tai fung in India cause why is my feed full of promo
English
1
0
3
109
krishaa
krishaa@stonksqween·
Time to pack my bags and move to West Bengal forever
English
14
0
75
2.8K
akshatha
akshatha@ughkshatha2·
@stonksqween been here ALL year nothing but the food, museums, and shopping is worth it, and the novelty of 2/3 of those runs out v quick
English
1
0
0
52
krishaa
krishaa@stonksqween·
Drank on friday, and then saturday, and then thought to not drink for 2 months. Drank on wednesday again, got really really dehydrated, thought to not drink for 2 months. Drank today again.
English
16
0
70
5.1K
akshatha
akshatha@ughkshatha2·
Even if I take nothing else away from Kolkata, god, please ensure i don't ever forget how good the thought of an afternoon nap feels right before I'm about to take it Amen
English
1
0
5
110
akshatha
akshatha@ughkshatha2·
baithe baithe cheeni kum dekhi wapis se b a n g e r (i love tabu but her voice kinda grates)
English
0
0
2
108
akshatha
akshatha@ughkshatha2·
@naam_pandit_hai RIGHT word same issue w chicken they j absorb the taste of the gravy
English
0
0
0
23
YASH PANDIT
YASH PANDIT@naam_pandit_hai·
The thing about paneer is its texture exists on a spectrum between that of thermocol and erasers, and the taste is just not worth it.
English
2
0
3
110
akshatha retweetledi
fleur
fleur@imonfleur·
you seem pretty unmotivated for a girl so competitive
English
272
57.2K
227.9K
2.7M
akshatha
akshatha@ughkshatha2·
WE'RE SO BACK HAHAHHAHA all it took was 24h of the big upset™ Also like Is it j me or are march and april the WORST months of every year
English
0
0
8
152
akshatha
akshatha@ughkshatha2·
@charcoalpott but you don't need to do something remarkable to be remarkable 🤷‍♀️
English
1
0
4
125
Delhi metro rider
Delhi metro rider@charcoalpott·
How will ever do anything remarkable in life if this goes on?
English
2
1
19
641
Shilpi Agrawal
Shilpi Agrawal@shilpiagrawal55·
it was ironic that in a premium tier-1 engineering college like BITS, the consensus among students was that the most amazing profs were humanities profs. i dont remember discussing specific dept profs, but everyone who has been to pilani knew & loved Prof Hari Nair. I also clearly remember an ad my friend made for PAVA (print audio & visual ad course) - more than I care to remember any of my own assignments - i think that ad should be actually put in front of audiences (was actually a @durex ad and the kind of iconic ad I have not seen in a looooong time)
Shobhit Bakliwal@shobhitic

did not got iit or nit but i did have some humanities courses - bhagwad gita - print audio and video advertisement - current affairs - creative writing - introduction to mass communication mostly because they were easy to score marks in 😅

English
3
0
25
5.5K
akshatha
akshatha@ughkshatha2·
bhai jab bhi zindagi mei kuch nayi confusion aa jaati hai na my feed starts dropping that one tarot wali didi reels and for a tarot nonbeliever this is getting too uncanny for my comfort
English
0
0
8
294
akshatha
akshatha@ughkshatha2·
itc has made this malkist dupe that i had no idea about until i literally joined in AND BRO YOU FOLKS ARE REALLY ONTO SOMETHING THERE wow It's called wowzers and I've literally never seen it before but insane
English
1
0
7
348
akshatha retweetledi
Raghav Chadha
Raghav Chadha@raghav_chadha·
Delivery partners across India went on strike demanding basic dignity, fair pay, safety, predictable rules and social security. The response from the Platform was to call them "miscreants" and turn a labour demand into a law & order narrative. That is not just insulting, it is dangerous. Workers asking for fair pay are not criminals. And if your system needs police to keep running on its biggest day, that is not proof the system works. That is an admission it doesn't. If you needed police to have your workers stay on the road, they're not employees. They're hostages with helmets. I am glad my intervention in Parliament has started a nationwide debate. Let me be clear. I am pro-business and pro-startups. I have stood for innovation and entrepreneurship in Parliament. India needs its builders and risk-takers. I will always back them. But I will never back exploitation dressed as progress. I am pro-industry, not pro-exploitation. Success cannot be built by squeezing the last ounce out of the people doing the hardest work. And apparently asking for fair pay is politics now. Strange how everything becomes 'political agenda' the moment it threatens margins or stock prices. Now, the favourite defence: "If the system were unfair, why do so many people work in it?" By that logic, zamindari was not exploitative because it ran for two centuries. Bonded labour was fair because people kept showing up. Every extractive system in history made the same argument. "They're still here, aren't they? Must be working." When one day’s income decides rent, electricity, or a child’s school fee, logging in on a strike day is not approval, it is survival. It is desperation. People remain trapped when better options do not exist. And please don’t sell people a distant dream to justify a present injustice. Promising that workers’ children will do better someday is not an answer to exploitation today. Record order numbers do not measure dignity. Lakhs of orders is a business metric, not a moral one. And it should make anyone pause when those numbers are celebrated on a night that is already known for higher-than-usual payouts compared to a regular day, while Platforms also credits ‘police action’ for keeping things under control. When scale is being applauded under those conditions, the obvious question is what is being counted and what is being ignored. That is a model being held up by pressure, not trust. This is also about Road Safety. Incentive structures that reward speed and punish delay put everyone at risk. Not just the delivery partner on the bike. The pedestrian crossing the street. The family in the car next to them. When we celebrate a 10-minute delivery, we should ask who pays the price when something goes wrong. Yes, technology can optimise logistics. But technology cannot replace transparency, protections and due process. A system where pay hides behind formulas no worker can see. Where incentives change overnight without notice. Where you are penalised for rain, traffic, app crashes. Where your livelihood can be switched off with one click and no hearing. That is not flexibility. That is control without accountability. If anyone broke the law that day, act against them. But do not use a few incidents to brand protesting workers as “miscreants” and crush a legitimate demand for fair pay and dignity. Silencing questions by insulting the people asking them, is not leadership. The answer to criticism is reform and accountability. I did not want to write a post this long. I would have preferred a healthy discussion on pay, safety, and protections. What came instead was coordinated noise. Within hours, identical talking points flooded our feeds. Board members who never discuss labour discovered social media. Influencers with no history of caring about workers began posting defences. As if someone had sent out a script. I have been in this long enough to recognise a paid campaign when I see one.😉 To those in the Platforms making personal calls and sending messages requesting for tweets in their favour: your efforts reached me before your tweets did. Many of those people are friends. They told me everything. Choose your contact list more carefully next time. Also, the sad part is that the PR agencies got paid. Influencers got paid. Hashtags got bought. The only people still waiting for fair payment are the ones delivering your orders. And when the arguments ran out, the attacks turned personal, on my family and my lifestyle. That is when you know the platform is panicking. When someone runs out of answers, they reach for insinuations. My life is transparent. I wonder if the same can be said for the algorithms that decide a worker's pay. Do not waste time debating my lifestyle. Focus on improving the lifestyle of gig workers. I have been fortunate and that’s exactly why I will use my position to raise these demands. If we have been given more, our duty is to demand fairness for those who are given less. Stop polarising a basic issue. The question is simple. Will we build India’s growth on dignity and safety, or on pressure and insecurity? I want Indian startups to scale. I am not here for agitation or disruption. I want these businesses to grow leaps and bounds, but not on the backs of the people who keep them running. As I said in Parliament, gig workers are the invisible wheels of the Indian economy. Platforms did not scale on code alone. They scaled on human labour. Real progress is simple and measurable. Fair and transparent pay, safety and insurance, social security, predictable rules and a grievance system with real due process. Progress is not how fast we deliver. Progress is whether the people who make the system run can live with dignity. This is a fight I will see through. In Parliament. Outside Parliament. Until there is accountability. The workers who built these platforms order by order, kilometre by kilometre, deserve better than to be called “miscreants" for asking to be treated as human beings. Jai Hind. Jai Bharat.🇮🇳
English
2.8K
516
2.6K
551.7K
akshatha retweetledi
sleepy cat || @iamdatemike.bsky.social
people - 10 minute deliveries are unreasonable comrade deepinder - actually no, 10 minute deliveries are the essence of socialism people - can you provide better working conditions comrade deepinder - WHY DONT YOU UNDERSTAND, THE POOR HAVE TO BE POOR TO BE HAPPY.
Deepinder Goyal@deepigoyal

Last one on this topic, and I have been holding this in myself for a while. For centuries, class divides kept the labor of the poor invisible to the rich. Factory workers toiled behind walls, farmers in distant fields, domestic help in backrooms. The wealthy consumed the fruits of that labor without ever seeing the faces or the fatigue behind it. No direct encounter, no personal guilt. The gig economy shattered that invisibility, at unprecedented scale. Suddenly, the poor aren't hidden away. They're at your doorstep: the delivery partner handing over your ₹1000+ biryani, late-night groceries, or quick-commerce essentials. You see them in the rain, heat, traffic, often on borrowed bikes, working 8–10 hours for earnings that give them sustenance. You see their exhaustion, their polite smile masking frustration with life in general. This is the first time in history at this scale that the working class and consuming class interact face-to-face, transaction after transaction. And that discomfort with our own selves is why we are uncomfortable about the gig economy. We want these people to look our part, so that the guilt we feel while taking orders from them feels less. We aren't just debating economics. We are confronting guilt. That ₹800 order might equal their entire day's earnings after fuel, bike rent, and app cuts. We tip awkwardly, or avoid eye contact, because the inequality is no longer abstract. It's personal. Pre-gig era, the rich could enjoy luxury without moral discomfort. Labor was out of sight. Now, every doorbell ring is a reminder of systemic inequality. That's why debates explode. It's not just policy. It's emotional reckoning. Some defend the system (“they choose it”), others demand change (“this isn't progress, its exploitation”). And here’s the uncomfortable twist: the unsaid ask of clumsy ‘solutions’ isn’t dignity. It is about returning to invisibility. Ban gig work and you don’t solve inequality. You remove livelihoods. These jobs don’t magically reappear as formal, protected employment the next day. They disappear, or they get pushed back into the informal economy where there are even fewer protections and even less accountability. Over-regulate it until the model breaks, and you achieve the same outcome through paperwork instead of slogans: the work evaporates, prices rise, demand collapses, and the people we claim to protect are the first to lose income. And then what happens? The rich get their old comfort back. Convenience returns without faces. Guilt dissolves. We go back to clean abstractions and moral posturing from a distance. The poor don’t become safer, they become invisible again: back in cash economies, back in backrooms, back in shadows where regulation rarely reaches and dignity isn’t even debated. The gig economy just exposed the reality of inequality to the people who previously had the luxury of not seeing it. The doorbell is not the problem. The question is what we do after opening the door. Visibility is the price of progress. We can either use this discomfort to build something better (which we keep doing continuously as delivery partners are our backbone), or we can ban and over-regulate our way back into ignorance. One of those choices improves lives. The other simply helps the consuming class feel virtuous in the dark.

English
10
117
979
19.7K