unirid

Out of experience, currently the best place to buy $ZEC is Router App Directly on Zcash, get your ZEC deposit address, go to @routerprotocol App, and swap any token on any chain to ZEC with 1 txn in under 20s. The second best place is ZEC on Solana (Also on Router App), just make sure it's this CA: A7bdiYdS5GjqGFtxf17ppRHtDKPkkRqbKtR27dxvQXaS Liquidity's good there, and it's easily bridgeable to Zcash via @near_intents when needed Don't buy on BSC (also out of experience :') )

@routerprotocol @trondao ❤️🩷

TRON (@trondao) is now live on Router's Open Graph Architecture! Seamless onchain swaps between TRON and the wider ecosystem are now available across Router's app and API. Built for users and builders. Experience it on app.routerprotocol.com

@loshmi @Rabby_io no competition for @DefiLlama here..

Name one Crypto Company that has no haters. I will start:

@scienceweb3 البنوك و الأنظمة المركزية سهل جداً اختراقها مقارنة بالبتكوين صح، بس التعديل عليها و تحديثها و تصحيح اي خطأ فيها سهل جداً بعكس البتكوين. مقارنة غير صحيحة برأيي. اتفق بنقطة انو الخبر اقرب للتلاعب عكل حال.

هذه الأخبار تم الترويج لها من قبل، ولا شيء تم الوصول إليه بعد الحديث عن اختراق البيتكوين مرتبط بالمستقبل وليس الحاضر وحتى في أسوأ سيناريو، اختراق محفظة بيتكوين يحتاج وقتا وجهدا كبيرا، هذا إن لم يكن مستحيلا أصلا. أما الأنظمة البنكية والمركزية، فاختراقها يمكن أن يتم بسرعة كبيرة جدا بمجرد الوصول إلى نقطة واحدة. الحواسيب الكمومية ما زالت غير قادرة حاليا على كسر التشفير بشكل فعلي. إذا وصلنا إلى هذه المرحلة، فلن يكون الخطر على البيتكوين فقط، بل على النظام المالي بالكامل.

@near_intents 🛡️

Going dark

Actually, it would have gone through using other swap apps as well It's more like an industry problem, basically the quote was there, the app warned about it and apparently the final outcome was within the set slippage tolerance. preventing would have been the best solution in this case but not sure if it should be the standard approach yet tbh -> which probably means the protocols are not yet ready to serve institutions..

sorry stani but this is no excuse the frontend shouldn't allow the trade to go through in the first place given the slippage involved. this type of trade could not have gone through in the first place on other swap apps and AAVE wants to serve institutions but can't even get their swap product right to protect their own users? it's not gonna happen with this type of attitude

Earlier today, a user attempted to buy AAVE using $50M USDT through the Aave interface. Given the unusually large size of the single order, the Aave interface, like most trading interfaces, warned the user about extraordinary slippage and required confirmation via a checkbox. The user confirmed the warning on their mobile device and proceeded with the swap, accepting the high slippage, which ultimately resulted in receiving only 324 AAVE in return. The transaction could not be moved forward without the user explicitly accepting the risk through the confirmation checkbox. The CoW Swap routers functioned as intended, and the integration followed standard industry practices. However, while the user was able to proceed with the swap, the final outcome was clearly far from optimal. Events like this do occur in DeFi, but the scale of this transaction was significantly larger than what is typically seen in the space. We sympathize with the user and will try to make a contact with the user and we will return $600K in fees collected from the transaction. The key takeaway is that while DeFi should remain open and permissionless, allowing users to perform transactions freely, there are additional guardrails the industry can build to better protect users. Our team will be investigating ways to improve these safeguards going forward.

Trade. Predict. Win. Enter live quests, conquer Price Arena, beat Candle Rush & earn future airdrop. Backed by Sigma Capital, BlockTheory Capital and @anuragarjun from Avail. Join Now: predictions.blinq.fi/quests

@blinqfi @anuragarjun Congrats team 🔥

@CryptoNexus08 @mert @checkprice thanks man

@jswihart 🔥

Ready?

@mert @CryptoNexus08 @checkprice Give code

@CryptoNexus08 @checkprice holy

@virtualbacon 70k*

@CryptoMan_Ram Hey @grok why is uncle CZ so angry?

is this AI?

@mert yo they're rugging coffee now!

checkprice dot com now lets you watchlist commodities, stocks, and forex I even added agriculture for example, check out my lean hog

So… what’s in the Blinq beta? We thought we’d show you instead of telling you. Check it out here: predictions.blinq.fi

@Bao_Chau99 Dropping sooner than you think! Socials here —> x.com/blinqFi discord.com/invite/Pp978xW… t.me/blinqdotfi

@FibrousFinance @routerprotocol 🔥🔥

Fibrous is now integrated on @routerprotocol via Router's new OGA model! We are fully dedicated to pushing the best rates for same chain steps across Monad, HyperEVM and Base. More routes, better trades

Router OGA isn't your typical DEX aggregator like 1inch or bridge aggregator like Li.fi. it's a quiet cross-chain whisperer, thoughtfully enabling true any-token-to-any-token swaps across the multiverse of chains. While most stay comfortably within single-chain gardens, with cross-chain as a hesitant side step, OGA weaves the whole landscape: every major bridge (Relay, Near intents, Across, Chainflip, THORChain, Mayan, and more) alongside DEXes, touching EVMs, Bitcoin, Solana, Tron, Zcash, and whatever else blooms. A few pertinent OGA advantages to muse on: - One serene integration opens everything, gracefully managing same-chain or cross-chain paths without the usual tangle. - Splitting routes across bridges and sources yields prices that feel elegantly fair, even for trades of considerable scale. - Multiple providers per journey bring fewer hiccups and a calm reliability. - Flexible fees that allow healthy margins while keeping the experience smooth. Attached: a screenshot of some meaningful size moving with quiet ease. A whimsical challenge to the ecosystem; share your own screenshot of comparable volume on 1inch, Li.Fi, or anyone else blindly matching these metrics. Curious what others can showcase. This new year, let's make the world a better place together, starting with crosschain routing

$ASTER / Aster There’s plenty of drama surrounding $ASTER right now, so let me clear up the backend optics to explain why this aggressive slide is actually happening. One of the main reasons there is carnage on this chart is purely a result of people thinking they’re smarter than the trend. The chart is in a downtrend, and a large majority of $ASTER bulls have refused to accept it. Every time we get a 2% bounce, you can see retail tries to "front-run" the bottom by aggressively longing. But all they're doing is providing the fuel for the next liquidation candle. It’s a vicious cycle. Longs bid the dip, get trapped, and then get forced to puke their positions, which drives price into the next support level. And while retail tries to "hero buy," the top traders on Binance are aggressively de-risking their positions on $ASTER. The top trader long ratio has dropped to 61.3% from 70% in just a week, showing the pros are stepping aside while retail continues to feed the monster. They’re letting the retail "dip-buyers" do the heavy lifting (and the dying) until the liquidity is finally exhausted. Meanwhile, notice the Cumulative Net Shorts is relatively flat. This confirms that this isn't an aggressive short attack, but it's just the pure weight of trapped longs selling into a void because there's no real buy-side liquidity left. Now, price is trying to hold the $0.70 support. But if it can’t hold this zone, all of these late bullish longs who have been trying to recoup their losses by knife-catching are about to get flushed. Again. As long as the ratio remains this unbalanced with zero buyer support, the chart is looking at a fast trip toward the $0.61 lows.

@crypto_condom @ika_xbt @arkham "Dont let personal biases obscure your judgement sir." yeah sure xD

Yeah, I understand that. Zooko did a nice post on it too. Dont let personal biases obscure your judgement sir. I dont believe ZEC is scalable tech and thus its overvalued imo. I firmly believe, and history has demonstrated, that smart contract privacy solutions are a superior option for dark pools and anonymoized transactions vs a seperate and distinct privacy chain. I neither hate nor love it. Just facts.

gg well played by @arkham There goes the $ZEC privacy narrative. Lower.

@dajmeri @mert @Wealthsimple You can help recover ALL assets sent to a supported address owned by you, not "certain" assets. To me it doesn't sound like the support was lying, just seems like the whole team has a very limited understanding and almost no experience with onchain activity. Which is worse :)

@mert @Wealthsimple Multi-chain support for USDC, ETH, and other assets is coming early next year. Agreed that the current experience is lacking. And yes, we can help recover certain assets sent to the wrong network so let me flag to our team to assist. Can you please DM me?

i) brother asks for money ii) I ask his Solana address, he sends it iii) I send him USDC iv) his "exchange" (@Wealthsimple) does not support Solana USDC even though it supports SOL and says they "can't recover it" incredible that we're still running this scam in 2025 lmao