Blockchain retweetledi
Blockchain
20.5K posts

Blockchain retweetledi

Two KRWQ stablecoins are pulling Korea’s digital won race in different directions
cryptopolitan.com/tokensquare-bs…
English
Blockchain retweetledi
Blockchain retweetledi

Millie Taplin was celebrating her 18th birthday at a nightclub when a stranger handed her a vodka lemonade, saying, “Try this.”
After one sip, her body went numb, and she couldn’t move, fully conscious but trapped.
She was rushed to the hospital, where doctors suspected she’d been drugged.
Her mother later shared the footage as a warning: never accept drinks from strangers.
English
Blockchain retweetledi

🚀 Today's Top 3 Activity Gainers
🥇 @BSVAssociation leads with a strong +87% surge
🥈 @hedera follows closely with +86% growth
🥉 @RedbellyNetwork adds +23%
📊 chainspect.app/dashboard?gain…

English
Blockchain retweetledi
Blockchain retweetledi

Look how dishonest this is.
Proving someone wrote the white paper would be direct evidence of authorship of the white paper. That is the thing being proved. It would not, by magic, prove ownership of some arbitrary Bitcoin key.
That is the whole distinction Dave is trying to bury.
Authorship of a document and control of a cryptographic key are different evidential questions. If someone proves they wrote the white paper, the proof links them to the paper. If someone proves they control a key, the proof links them to the key at that moment. Neither proof automatically imports the other.
Dave’s trick is to bundle separate acts together under the label “Satoshi” and then pretend that proving one attributed act proves all attributed acts. That is nonsense.
The argument becomes:
“Satoshi wrote the white paper.”
“Satoshi supposedly generated certain keys.”
“Therefore, proof of one must validate the other.”
No. That is not logic. That is aggregation by folklore.
If you want to prove authorship, show authorship evidence. If you want to prove key control, show key-control evidence. If you want to prove that the author and the key-holder are the same person or group, show the bridge between them.
That bridge is exactly what is missing.
Saying “Satoshi means whoever did the things attributed to Satoshi” is a definitional scam. It lets Dave smuggle unproven acts into the same basket, then pretend the basket proves its contents.
Writing the white paper is an attributed act with one evidential pathway. Generating or controlling a Bitcoin key is another. You do not get to staple them together with a nickname and call it proof.
David 'JoelKatz' Schwartz@JoelKatz
If someone proved they wrote the white paper would that prove they had any connection to Satoshi? By your reasoning, it would not. All it would prove is that they did something attributed to Satoshi but for all we know the actual Satoshi didn't write the whitepaper and someone just Satoshi's pseudonym on it. See how silly that is? By "Satoshi", we mean whoever or whatever group did the things attributed to Satoshi. Writing the whitepaper is one of those things. Having generated certain keys is another.
English
Blockchain retweetledi

I think AI isn’t really smart, especially @grok. It just copies people’s opinions and outputs them. When I asked for a list of people most likely to be Satoshi, only ChatGPT included Dr. Craig Wright @CsTominaga
English
Blockchain retweetledi
Blockchain retweetledi
Blockchain retweetledi
Blockchain retweetledi

@BitcoinArchive He got something right... finally
English
Blockchain retweetledi

WIKILEAKS FOUNDER JULIAN ASSANGE: “Bitcoin is an extremely important innovation, but not in the way most people think.
Bitcoin's real innovation is a globally verifiable proof publishing at a certain time.
The whole system is built on that concept, and many other systems can also be built on it.
The block chain nails down history, breaking Orwell's dictum of 'He who controls the present controls the past and he who controls the past controls the future'.”



English
Blockchain retweetledi
Blockchain retweetledi

In the 2000s, Loni Willison was a stunning fitness model living the dream. She married a Baywatch actor, then everything imploded.
Divorced after 2 years, she was fired from her job, had a mental breakdown, and became a full blown meth addict.
By 2016, she was homeless on Venice Beach, scavenging trash, teeth rotted out, looking like a completely different person.
She rejects all help: “I don’t want help from anyone” Loni insists.
From magazine covers to dumpster diving in under a decade.


English
Blockchain retweetledi
Blockchain retweetledi
Blockchain retweetledi

We’re proud to welcome our member @BSVAssociation as a Diamond Sponsor of Nordic Blockchain Conference 2026.
BSV Association is a Switzerland-based non-profit organisation and global advocate for the BSV blockchain - advancing adoption of a scalable, energy-efficient public blockchain designed for enterprise and government use cases. Through developer support, education, and strategic partnerships, they are driving applications across data management, supply chains, and digital identity at a global scale.
We’re excited to join forces with BSV Association and continue building connections between the innovators, enterprises, and institutions driving the next wave of blockchain adoption - at NBC2026 and beyond.

English
Blockchain retweetledi
Blockchain retweetledi











