2-111

86 posts

2-111 banner
2-111

2-111

@valkandier

semi inactive account - ic: @yua37 lofter

Katılım Ekim 2020
61 Takip Edilen48 Takipçiler
2-111
2-111@valkandier·
@notnotnotdussy0 @mengya9918 The video attached is the artist’s “proof” that they posted on telegram in which they’ve coincidentally merged almost all layers and the file was made on the 11th when the art was originally posted on the 9th. There’s also SynthID watermarks found in several of their works
English
0
0
1
34
dusy:33
dusy:33@notnotnotdussy0·
@mengya9918 I’m confused. What is happening in this video and why does it prove that AI was used…?
English
1
0
0
33
ASWN00
ASWN00@aswn00·
Tell me to grow wings... And let's fly out of this stupid town! #deltatune
ASWN00 tweet media
English
217
10.1K
56.9K
2.9M
2-111
2-111@valkandier·
@FragolaBunny @banban131109 Also if we try your logic and test just the background, it doesn't get flagged. This is because the SynthID watermark is laid over the ENTIRE image and cutting certain parts out can make it unrecognizable. the watermark is built to withstand small transformations, not big ones.
2-111 tweet media
English
0
0
1
32
2-111
2-111@valkandier·
@FragolaBunny @banban131109 The SynthID is laid over the entire image, so yes if you cut part of it out the detector may not recognize it. if it was really just backgrounds, why did this one get flagged? are you going to say she photobashed the nearly non-existent background of this one too?
2-111 tweet media2-111 tweet media
English
1
0
2
49
2-111
2-111@valkandier·
@banban131109 @playcentermd this is funny because there was recently an AI artist that got exposed in the WHA fandom who used the exact same excuses about photobashing AI backgrounds and similarly could not produce the original photos when asked x.com/Yamaoeie/statu…
Yama💫@Yamaoeie

Dear @xenillxy, who has been accused of using AI to create art. The Knights of Moralis have found significant evidence that your recent “artworks” are AI GENERATED. They deleted their links on bio so I'm putting it here: VGEN: vgen.co/SovereignSolace More evidence below 👇🏻

English
0
0
4
488
バン
バン@banban131109·
@playcentermd her next pathetic excuse, again only in her tg channel: she claims it was just random AI BACKGROUNDS, but can’t even prove that, saying like a kid she’ll “wait till everyone calms down.” so she’s literally just waiting for ppl to forget. wtf haha
バン tweet media
English
2
6
137
24.1K
2-111
2-111@valkandier·
@FragolaBunny If you have any proof that it does have a higher fpr than whats been documented by deepmind research then id be fine with that. But i already knew that its false negative rate was higher, afaik it kinda has to be for them to meet that target of 0.1% fpr /gen
English
0
0
3
88
2-111
2-111@valkandier·
@FragolaBunny @aswn00 Basically No SynthID detected = odds are that it could still be AI generated SynthID detected = very high odds that its AI generated there's a reason why i said the fpr was 0.1% instead of saying it has a 99.9% accuracy, because these two things are separate.
English
1
0
4
124
2-111
2-111@valkandier·
@Alpacat2 Though ofc it would be a stronger case if it wasnt just deepmind's study but i struggled to find much else that would conduct a study on it in a similar way (and specifically on the image generation model and not text generation). Which article had the 2-8%? /gen
English
0
0
3
104
2-111
2-111@valkandier·
@Alpacat2 Its reportedly 0.1% from OpenAI's own research paper on it arxiv.org/pdf/2510.09263 Also they clearly arent just using AI to refine details the AI is doing most of the heavy lifting, otherwise they wouldnt be as hesitant to show any wips or layers at all
2-111 tweet media2-111 tweet media
English
1
0
6
229
2-111
2-111@valkandier·
@banban131109 omg that person that said she added the stripe of kris's shirt and noelle's checkers afterwards cause the AI didn't was right 😭
English
0
0
16
2.4K
バン
バン@banban131109·
@playcentermd small update: she keeps digging herself deeper on telegram. she says the textures caused the detection and showed "A LOT OF LAYERS" but they’re just color correction layers, not the actual art. yet even a screenshot of the b&w version STILL DETECTS A SYNTHID WATERMARK. thoughts?
バン tweet mediaバン tweet mediaバン tweet media
English
4
5
148
38.1K
M0b
M0b@DupontTito27024·
@valkandier @leyes_tomi I know lmao , look what they had the audacity to post on their telegram , only 5 days apart 💀
M0b tweet mediaM0b tweet media
English
1
0
3
196
2-111
2-111@valkandier·
praying they delete their account atp im so annoyed
English
0
0
1
62
2-111
2-111@valkandier·
i lowkey be using this account as a burner to fight with entitled people
English
0
0
0
51
2-111
2-111@valkandier·
@DupontTito27024 @leyes_tomi ^ also this guy DIDNT "drew that" lol the AI did 90% of the work if not 100% of it. No shade to Luaa but what they said is a little misleading because this more-than-likely goes way past just being rendered by AI
2-111 tweet media
English
1
0
5
232
M0b
M0b@DupontTito27024·
@leyes_tomi @Chromateded @playcentermd 2 is still true no matter the extent its used , and you forgot about 3 - feeding your art and training generative ai even though its currently killing the art industry .
English
2
0
4
363
2-111
2-111@valkandier·
@in_six_games @Chromateded like I said AI does most of the heavy lifting its not actually like traditional rendering? You can tell from how their AI works look completely different from their real art style in many ways. also ur weird af for implying it Would be fine if the AI just did normal rendering
2-111 tweet media
English
1
0
31
905
Katt
Katt@in_six_games·
@valkandier @Chromateded fuck rendering all my homies hate rendering. it's the most time consuming portion of the process
English
2
0
1
997
2-111
2-111@valkandier·
@Chromateded would actually argue that its worse. As an artist they are definitely fully aware of what AI takes from us, + the fact that they clearly have the resources and skill for digital art, but would rather resort to AI out of laziness. Also AI definitely does most the heavy lifting.
English
1
0
39
1.2K