Lars 🇪🇺🇳🇱

890 posts

Lars 🇪🇺🇳🇱 banner
Lars 🇪🇺🇳🇱

Lars 🇪🇺🇳🇱

@vanderberg88

Ave Europa, nostra vera patria! ἀλήθεια #nafo

Brussels Katılım Mart 2026
273 Takip Edilen108 Takipçiler
Lars 🇪🇺🇳🇱
Lars 🇪🇺🇳🇱@vanderberg88·
Mykhailo Rohoza@MykhailoRohoza

The Trump phenomenon: why did half of America believe a liar? Many people keep asking the same question: how did Donald Trump come to power? Why did such massive support go to a man widely seen as uneducated, irresponsible, and narcissistically self-obsessed? Why did intelligence, competence, and experience suddenly carry so little political weight — and what does that say about democracy itself? • Populism always sells simple answers. Where experts talk about complexity, risks, and nuance, populists shout slogans. “Build the wall.” “Bring back greatness.” A slogan is always shorter than analysis — and therefore more effective for masses tired of thinking, or who never wanted to think deeply in the first place. • Emotion defeats argument. Trump, like every demagogue, spoke not to reason but to emotion. His rhetoric was built on anger, resentment, and fear. He created enemies, promised revenge, and avoided complicated explanations. Like many populists before him, he relied less on programs and more on outrage and emotionally charged narratives. • Simplicity becomes the language of the “common people.” Intellectuals almost always lose in mass politics. Complex language irritates people. Many feel uncomfortable when they do not understand something, but instead of admitting it, they blame the speaker. The person who speaks more simply is seen as “one of us.” • Confidence is mistaken for competence. Human nature has not changed. People still confuse decisiveness with wisdom and confidence with knowledge. Trump became a perfect example of the Dunning–Kruger effect: a man with limited understanding who presents himself as a genius. Yet this blind self-confidence is exactly what many voters perceive as strength. • Populists surround themselves with weaker people. Demagogues and authoritarian-minded leaders fear intelligent independent thinkers. That is why they often surround themselves with loyal but less competent figures. Trump’s first administration was partially restrained by institutional inertia and traditional Republicans. Later, many critics argued he increasingly preferred loyalists, conspiracy theorists, and ideological fanatics over experienced professionals. • History keeps repeating itself. A society searching for easy answers repeatedly opens the door to demagogues. Instead of embracing the difficult reality of democracy — compromise, institutions, responsibility — people choose the illusion of simplicity. They want a “strong leader” who supposedly “knows how” and will finally “tell the truth,” even if that truth is largely fiction. • Knowledge itself becomes a disadvantage. One of the paradoxes of modern politics is that intellect often appears weak. Thoughtfulness creates doubt, and doubt annoys people. The one who analyzes seems uncertain. The one who promises certainty sounds convincing. For many voters, appearance matters more than reality. The lesson is simple and brutal: democracy without thoughtful voters is only a shell. As long as large parts of society continue believing in easy answers to complex problems, the Trump phenomenon — or something very similar to it — will keep returning in different countries and under different faces. And every time, it comes with the same promise: “I alone can fix it.” That is why democracy requires more than voting. It requires thinking. Without that, anyone with a slogan can become your master.

English
1
0
2
14
Sacrum Imperium 🇪🇺🇻🇦
@vanderberg88 This shows that an institutional and legal framework for international cooperation can exist if, and only if, there is a hegemon with an interest in defending it.
English
1
0
2
9
Lars 🇪🇺🇳🇱 retweetledi
Mohamad Safa
Mohamad Safa@mhdksafa·
This’s Cuba and there’s no electricity The U.S is starving millions of people in Cuba. The U.S. is laying siege cruelly cut off all fuel, power is out, leaving hospitals without electricity. Dialysis patients, babies in NICU, and others will die. This’s a crime against humanity.
English
622
6.9K
10.9K
128.3K
Lars 🇪🇺🇳🇱 retweetledi
European Democrats
European Democrats@democrats_eu·
According to the Financial Times, one report says two things Europe cannot ignore: Xi Jinping reportedly told Donald Trump that Putin may regret invading Ukraine, while Trump allegedly floated teaming up with China and Russia against the International Criminal Court. The contrast is brutal. Even Beijing sees Russia’s war as a trap; Trump sees international justice as the enemy. Europe must choose the opposite path: Ukraine, law, accountability.
European Democrats tweet media
English
5
22
46
1.2K
Lars 🇪🇺🇳🇱 retweetledi
Takeshi Kovacs
Takeshi Kovacs@PrzemekShura·
🇫🇷 Prezydent Francji oświadczył, że nakazał zwiększenie liczby nuklearnych ładunków bojowych w arsenale Piątej Republiki. Paryż nie zamierza już ujawniać realnych danych dotyczących swoich zapasów jądrowych — informacje te zostają objęte klauzulą tajności. Francja, która tradycyjnie deklarowała posiadanie około 290 głowic jądrowych i jako jedyne państwo zachodnie oficjalnie podawała dokładną liczbę swojego arsenału, podjęła decyzję o całkowitym utajnieniu tych statystyk. Decyzja o rozbudowie i utajnieniu potencjału nuklearnego jest bezpośrednią odpowiedzią Paryża na rosnące zagrożenie geopolityczne, wojnę w Europie Wschodniej oraz nuklearną retorykę Rosji. Francja jest obecnie jedynym państwem Unii Europejskiej, które posiada własną, niezależną od USA broń jądrową.
Polski
18
504
2.1K
43.6K
Lars 🇪🇺🇳🇱 retweetledi
Emmanuel Macron
Emmanuel Macron@EmmanuelMacron·
Sverige har valt Naval Groups FDI-fregatt för att modernisera sin marin. Jag tackar Sverige och uppskattar det förtroende som visats Frankrike. Efter Frankrikes beslut att utrusta sig med Saabs GlobalEye för att förnya sin flotta av radarspaningsflygplan (Awacs) är detta ett strategiskt beslut av stor betydelse som speglar det ömsesidiga förtroendet mellan våra två länder. Vårt partnerskap har dessutom fortsatt att stärkas under de senaste åren och sträcker sig ända fram till Sveriges deltagande i den framskjutna avskräckningen. Ett starkt och suveränt Europa inom Nato – det är vår syn på vårt gemensamma försvar och vår gemensamma säkerhet. Det byggs varje dag.
Svenska
96
259
1.5K
64.7K
Lars 🇪🇺🇳🇱
Lars 🇪🇺🇳🇱@vanderberg88·
"When the rules of the game change, you don't just watch. You help rewrite them." -Carney The Eu. Canada, Australia, Uk, south Korea and Japan. The new free world. Under trump the US is lost. We pray for the mid terms and '28. Those will decide where the US is truly heading.
English
0
0
1
20
Lars 🇪🇺🇳🇱 retweetledi
ᐅIΟϺΕᐅΕϟ
ᐅIΟϺΕᐅΕϟ@DaemonDiomedes·
Helleno-Futurism
ᐅIΟϺΕᐅΕϟ tweet media
Español
14
111
1.1K
12.2K
Lars 🇪🇺🇳🇱 retweetledi
Mykhailo Rohoza
Mykhailo Rohoza@MykhailoRohoza·
The Trump phenomenon: why did half of America believe a liar? Many people keep asking the same question: how did Donald Trump come to power? Why did such massive support go to a man widely seen as uneducated, irresponsible, and narcissistically self-obsessed? Why did intelligence, competence, and experience suddenly carry so little political weight — and what does that say about democracy itself? • Populism always sells simple answers. Where experts talk about complexity, risks, and nuance, populists shout slogans. “Build the wall.” “Bring back greatness.” A slogan is always shorter than analysis — and therefore more effective for masses tired of thinking, or who never wanted to think deeply in the first place. • Emotion defeats argument. Trump, like every demagogue, spoke not to reason but to emotion. His rhetoric was built on anger, resentment, and fear. He created enemies, promised revenge, and avoided complicated explanations. Like many populists before him, he relied less on programs and more on outrage and emotionally charged narratives. • Simplicity becomes the language of the “common people.” Intellectuals almost always lose in mass politics. Complex language irritates people. Many feel uncomfortable when they do not understand something, but instead of admitting it, they blame the speaker. The person who speaks more simply is seen as “one of us.” • Confidence is mistaken for competence. Human nature has not changed. People still confuse decisiveness with wisdom and confidence with knowledge. Trump became a perfect example of the Dunning–Kruger effect: a man with limited understanding who presents himself as a genius. Yet this blind self-confidence is exactly what many voters perceive as strength. • Populists surround themselves with weaker people. Demagogues and authoritarian-minded leaders fear intelligent independent thinkers. That is why they often surround themselves with loyal but less competent figures. Trump’s first administration was partially restrained by institutional inertia and traditional Republicans. Later, many critics argued he increasingly preferred loyalists, conspiracy theorists, and ideological fanatics over experienced professionals. • History keeps repeating itself. A society searching for easy answers repeatedly opens the door to demagogues. Instead of embracing the difficult reality of democracy — compromise, institutions, responsibility — people choose the illusion of simplicity. They want a “strong leader” who supposedly “knows how” and will finally “tell the truth,” even if that truth is largely fiction. • Knowledge itself becomes a disadvantage. One of the paradoxes of modern politics is that intellect often appears weak. Thoughtfulness creates doubt, and doubt annoys people. The one who analyzes seems uncertain. The one who promises certainty sounds convincing. For many voters, appearance matters more than reality. The lesson is simple and brutal: democracy without thoughtful voters is only a shell. As long as large parts of society continue believing in easy answers to complex problems, the Trump phenomenon — or something very similar to it — will keep returning in different countries and under different faces. And every time, it comes with the same promise: “I alone can fix it.” That is why democracy requires more than voting. It requires thinking. Without that, anyone with a slogan can become your master.
Mykhailo Rohoza tweet media
English
322
1K
2K
88.1K
Lars 🇪🇺🇳🇱 retweetledi
Gandalv
Gandalv@Microinteracti1·
The West Has Already Lost the Drone War. It Just Hasn’t Noticed Yet. Here is something that should ruin your Monday. A Ukrainian AI drone engineer has gone on record to explain, calmly and with considerable evidence, that Western military planning is not behind the times. It is not lagging. It is not in need of reform. It is dead. Obsolete. A relic propped up by expensive acronyms and men in uniforms who still think the tank is the apex predator of land warfare. Yaroslav Azhnyuk, founder of AI drone company The Fourth Law, has done the maths. FPV drones now account for somewhere between 70 and 80 percent of frontline casualties in Ukraine. Not artillery. Not missiles. Not the armoured columns that NATO has spent forty years and several fortunes preparing to counter. Small, cheap, autonomous flying machines that cost about as much as a decent restaurant dinner and kill with the precision of a surgeon. But here is where it gets genuinely terrifying. China can produce four billion FPV drones per year. Ukraine, a country that has been at war for three years and is building faster than anyone in the West, manages four million. That is the kind of number that makes you want to lie down on the floor and stare at the ceiling for a while. The West is not losing the AI arms race because it lacks the technology. It is losing because it is still arguing about procurement frameworks while the future arrives, uninvited, at four hundred kilometres per hour with a shaped charge attached. Latest 👇 gandalv.substack.com/p/ukraine-the-…
Gandalv tweet media
English
325
1.6K
4.1K
270K
Sam Browne
Sam Browne@SamBrowneBelts·
@EuropaAdAstra My greatest disgust with the left is that theyre liars who argue in bad faith, propagate what they know are lies for the sake of whatever they see as a greater good and are up their own ass convinced of so much that just isn't true.
English
1
0
2
69
Lars 🇪🇺🇳🇱
Lars 🇪🇺🇳🇱@vanderberg88·
The self-censorship was real and it cost Europe time. But the story now is that Europe is finding its voice, and backing it with policy. Strategic autonomy is a decision already being made.
English
0
0
1
17
Lars 🇪🇺🇳🇱
Lars 🇪🇺🇳🇱@vanderberg88·
Friedrich Merz said out loud what everyone was thinking: "The leadership claim of the U.S. is being challenged, perhaps already lost." Europe's leaders stopped restraining their public criticism.
English
1
0
1
27
Lars 🇪🇺🇳🇱
Lars 🇪🇺🇳🇱@vanderberg88·
Eu leaders spent 2025 staying quiet about Trump. Then something snapped. Carnegie's Stefan Lehne called it "the language of submission." ECFR documented how von der Leyen's silence "gave the impression of tacit approval." This wasn't diplomacy. It was self-censorship with a cost.
English
3
0
1
89
Lars 🇪🇺🇳🇱 retweetledi
European Democrats
European Democrats@democrats_eu·
Peace will not come from wishful thinking. @kajakallas is right: talks are stalled because Moscow still believes it can wait out democracy. It cannot. Russia is weaker than its propaganda claims, and Europe must push harder: sanctions, weapons for Ukraine, a united diplomatic front. China says it wants stability; then it must use its leverage on Putin. No more theatre, no false neutrality, no rewarding aggression. Stop the war. Choose peace.
English
43
82
210
1.9K
Lars 🇪🇺🇳🇱
Lars 🇪🇺🇳🇱@vanderberg88·
For most of us, identity is already borderless; we move, work, and hang out across the continent without thinking about it. But the law is stuck in the 20th century, guarded by a legal wall in the EU treaties that keeps us tied to a single nationality.
English
5
0
21
577