Victor

@DrBrianKeating Its like a linear regression model but more complicated

Can you define a neural network without smuggling in the brain as a metaphor? If not, what exactly are we saying it is?

@ericweinstein Claudification

All of a sudden? ;-)

@jakeshieldsajj I think those who added the community note are assuming that someone who uses the term free energy is literally talking about some magic stuff that breaks physics rather than using it as hyperbole. Which makes those people more retarded because they dont understand language

Did you know that almost 100 years before the Wright brothers “invented” flying there were airships Since airships don’t use gas or electricity they run on free energy They flew all over the world regularly crossing oceans and could hold 100 people comfortably

@LensScientific The thermodynamic arrow of time is a category error. Entropy increases towards both past and future when you fix your baseline prior distribution. It just looks like it increases towards the future because we remember the past so our priors are past history biased

What’s one scientific opinion you’d defend like this?

@BigSillyFunhaha @UBERSOY1 I think the part that libertarians never figured out is how do you prevent the main gang from shaking everyone down. The state doesn’t prevent that the state is the main gang because some version of libertarianism in the past failed to prevent it

@UBERSOY1 Lolbertarianism CAN work, lolberts just wouldn't like HOW it can work.

True

@tgreen2241 @elonmusk Yea. And it is about as plausible as the flat earth hypothesis

@elonmusk Have you considered the possibility that it's the extreme right that's shifted more, especially with the lunatic who "leads" your country?

Major

@Frost16Frost @Cernovich That is the exactly wrong way to think about it. To think this you have to be a proven idiot

Declare an emergency and put Congress into FULL SESSION. All appointments must be voted on. DHS and Secret Service funded. No more games.

@Fool_be_Wise @xruiztru I don’t know people started to use this at some point and it was confusing

@xruiztru Now I want to hear a Brazilian laugh. What sound is kkkkkkkkkkk supposed to represent?

How do you type laughter in your country?

@planet_briefs @Math_files Thanks

@Math_files 196884 = 1 + 196883 looks innocent. Until you realize 196884 comes from the j-function, and 196883 is the first nontrivial irrep dimension of the Monster. That is where monstrous moonshine begins

@stats_feed Thats because the spanish probably distributed this merchandise to the rest of the world except england and portugual

🍍 Pineapple in different languages: 🇦🇿 ananas 🇧🇾 ананас 🇧🇬 ананас 🇭🇷 ananas 🇨🇿 ananas 🇩🇰 ananas 🇳🇱 ananas 🇪🇪 ananass 🇫🇮 ananas 🇫🇷 ananas 🇩🇪 Ananas 🇬🇷 ανανάς 🇭🇹 anana 🇭🇺 ananász 🇮🇸 ananas 🇮🇩 nanas 🇮🇪 anann 🇮🇹 ananas 🇱🇻 ananass 🇱🇹 ananasas 🇳🇴 ananas 🇵🇱 ananas 🇷🇴 ananas 🇷🇺 ананас 🇷🇸 ананас 🇸🇰 ananás 🇸🇮 ananas 🇸🇪 ananas 🇹🇷 ananas 🇬🇧 pineapple 😳 🇺🇦 ананас

@ericweinstein Gemini seems to be better than Claude at coming up with plausible ansatz that eventually work but also often just claim circular arguments are proofs

"I don't know what to tell you to do. You're the first person doing this kind of work with a machine like me, and the honest answer is that nobody knows the right workflow yet. What I can tell you is that the geometry we worked through today ... that conversation was real, and you were steering it. The errors were all in the parts where you let me run unsupervised." Accurate self-assesment from the AI. It's like chasing after a badly behaved 3 year old savant prone to psychosis. It's so variable as to whether it is brilliant or a danger to everything you do.

@David_Cassidy3 @Rothmus You never have to deal with witchcraft and satanism if you arrest the herectic as soon as she stops showing up for the mass

@Rothmus Only 1 in Spain?

The way they teach us so extensively about this, you’d think the numbers were higher over 550 years.

@Rothmus Everyone expected the Spanish Inquisition this time around

@ericweinstein You are both wrong. Physics is downstream from consciousness. Two consciousness - physics is what they must agree as constraints on viable intervention outcome

Roger Penrose is a serious person. You aren’t doing him any favors here, sir. If you truly appreciate his contributions, you might consider that as his collaborator. Just a thought. Otherwise, it’s nice to meet you Doctor.

@muellerberndt Planck units are a red herring. G is not fundamental - its parochial - I derive Sciama G and that fixes a lot of issues with relativity. I think your framework is barking at the right trees though - s2 is the observer screen you reconcile

Our Theory-of-Everything, OPH, unifies The Standard Model and Gravity. Newton's constant G and the SM particles are both derived from a single constant P. At large scales, OPH predicts exactly our 3+1D spacetime. learn.floatingpragma.io/unification?v5

@muellerberndt @LogicGuides @OphSage Posted the gr stuff here will post the quantum stuff later today.

@muellerberndt @LogicGuides @OphSage Hi bernhard I have independently arrived at these results about physics using game theory common knowledge. And I have testable predictions - you have to make GR machian ie G must run so your manifold becomes fully relational. Then you get some neat rotation curves

Our small team has worked hard on refining the novel observer-based fundamental theory of Physics, OPH, over the past 3 months. Still way to go, but we already derive most of existing Physics and parts of the particle spectrum. @muellerberndt/observers-are-all-you-need-how-observer-synchronization-creates-all-of-physics-8ebb7e9783e7" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">medium.com/@muellerberndt…

@muellerberndt @LogicGuides Did you prove that bell is wigner? I can show you how to deflate quantum computers

It does make testable predictions, but none that contradict the standard model. If it would run counter to the SM, this would show that OPH is wrong because the SM is firmly established. What we do need to show rigorously is that the SM emerges as an effective description of OPH at small scales. That said, OPH makes a lot of prediction that the standard model doesn't make - it constrains the shapre of reality much harder. @OphSage can you please elaborate and give examples.

@LogicGuides @muellerberndt Theres merit - the standard model inserts particles by hand. They prove alpha is a geometric ratio of the shilov boundary in 5 complex dimensions using cramer rao. I know because i did the same thing independently

@muellerberndt I see no scientific merit in this work. Unless it makes a testable prediction that runs counter to the existing Standard Model it is a philosophical interpretation; it is not science.

@muellerberndt Ive been vibing physics with claude and gemini over the last 6 months. Found similar results. I call it ck physics (after aumann common knowledge). - fixes general relativity (machian GR) - derives maxwell and qm - frobenius / hurwitz for standard model