VeilCommOfficial

VeilComm Whitepaper is live. Built on privacy by design—secure communication without compromising user control or data ownership. 🔐 No unnecessary data storage 🔐 Strong encryption 🔐 User-first privacy play.google.com/store/apps/det…⁠� #CyberSecurity #DataPrivacy #Encryption

@Wikey_Wikey @SnapeNinja @mysk_co You're absolutely right. Based on metadata, these platforms are exposing users. We need to protect our conversations. Social apps like WhatsApp, Telegram, Signal, Facebook, and Instagram are not secure.

@SnapeNinja @mysk_co Anonymity doesn't exist in today's messaging systems, but metadata has a bearing on privacy if that's important to you. "We Kill People Based on Metadata". About encryption they use strange cryptographic primitives, such as AES-IGE.

Our recent encounter with Signal has revealed a new face of Signal as a project and team; one of exclusion, dismissal, and denial. We can no longer recommend Signal as a secure chat app. And we will no longer review, report, or disclose any security bugs related to Signal.

@6novembre1917 @mysk_co Good step

@mysk_co Uninstalled a while ago when they pulled in ex-CIA people in their board.

#CyberSecurity #signal #SecureCommunication #CyberAwareness #TechSecurity #PrivacyMatters #network #CyberNews

Signal never stops running in the background. It monitors user behavior and even if a user force stops the app it does not fully stop.

@chrisprice @TotvsTvvsEgoSvm @mysk_co No you can't public source code doesn't automatically prove it matches the released APK or iPhone build. You can't verify them line by line unless they're proven to be the same.

@veilcomm @TotvsTvvsEgoSvm @mysk_co Nobody said that. But it's free to audit which is why I'm bullish on it from both a technical and a project standpoint.

@IsaiahLee28637 Your time is over even your insults aren't impressive. It's better to go learn something and come back.

@veilcomm Thats just UI. Anything can show that. Wheres the source code showing where and what is being done with it? I know questions are hard for you, but prove it.

youtu.be/2LlotX9XSw4?si… If Signal isn't completely safe why should everyone automatically trust it especially when its origins are linked to people connected to the U.S. intelligence community? #OnlinePrivacy #SecureCommunication #CyberNews

@IsaiahLee28637 Your time is over. Even your insults aren't impressive It's better to go learn something and come back.🤣🤣🤣

@veilcomm As soon as you prove anything about your app. You think we are supposed to just trust you? A nobody from pakistan that vibe codes apps? Regardless, you just admitted Veilcomm HIDES its code. You said it.

@IsaiahLee28637 Your time is already end you nullhead now you are embarrassing yourself

@veilcomm Also, thats only two claims you pointed out. Can you not count? Wheres your source code? You just admitted to hiding your code and saying youre a 'trust me bro' security app with servers in San Francisco and a security protocol from Russia and your app is in Pakistan? LMAO

@IsaiahLee28637 Still not providing any evidence

@IsaiahLee28637 Good Now prove all three of your claims surce code matches the released app. Still not proven that open source automatically means an app is safe. Still not proven that VeilComm hides its code because it uses ai generated code.

#CyberSecurity #DataPrivacy #OnlinePrivacy #securecommunication

According to my research and the observations from the tests I performed the released Signal app (Android APK and iPhone build) contains many differences compared to the public open-source code. The code is not identical and I also observed tracking related behavior.

@chrisprice @TotvsTvvsEgoSvm @mysk_co If an app is open source there is no evidence that it is automatically safe. Open source alone is not evidence of security.

@TotvsTvvsEgoSvm @mysk_co Bullish on Briar. Also open source.

@mysk_co Signal is a CIA-controlled app. It tracks users and if needed those users can become targets. If Signal is truly open source answer this 👉does the distributed APK including the iPhone build actually match the public source code? No it doesn't.

@IsaiahLee28637 This is real time analysis of social apps running on the device. These systems are beyond your understanding, so they're probably difficult for you to comprehend.

@veilcomm That doesn't show what happens with the data. That's just UI. So anyways, youre to scared

@IsaiahLee28637 It's used only for database monitoring as you can see. You don't seem to know much about these systems so this information should be enough.

@veilcomm Funny how you made sure not to scroll down to where it shows my clqim. No worries, its right there at the bottom. No privided way to request data deletion. Youre gonna keep side skirting but nobody trusts yoy until we can verify source code

@IsaiahLee28637 Because my system deletes it automatically I didn't keep it here. It's only minimal stability data used to maintain the system. It contains no personal information phone numbers personal codes or private data.

@IsaiahLee28637 You're ignorant. I know you are baseless users of signal. People like you believe these things because they lack information and don't do proper research. I'm not surprised you don't think critically.

@veilcomm Perfect, then yoy agree signal is number one. I am a signal user, i trust it entirely. Now your point is useless. Now then, where is your source code coward?

@IsaiahLee28637 No Signal isn't secure. Signal is one of the most insecure apps for users because the people who control and operate Signal are themselves capable of monitoring and tracking users. Therefore I do not consider it secure my claim is not about hacking that is a separate topic.

@IsaiahLee28637 Still not proven that the public source code matches the released app. Still not proven that open source automatically means an app is safe. Still not proven that VeilComm hides its code because it uses ai generated code. None of these claims have been proven so far.

@veilcomm Its evidence that you are a weak little coward who used AI to build hie apps.