L.

me diverti demais fazendo as velas e branding dessas aqui criado somente pra estudo

Kane Parsons has revealed that Blender played an integral part in developing the ‘BACKROOMS’ movie. • Concept art was developed entirely in Blender • Blender was used to make set designs before they were brought to life physically

x͓xR͓͓E͓͓N͓͓D͓͓E͓͓R͓ ͓0͓͓13 ͓V͓͓0͓͓0͓͓1͓xx

whack a bevel + standard subdivision on after and you get a lovely final mesh from a stupidly simple cage

My custom subD modifier with auto-creasing feels like cheating

Believe it or not i was hoping for this silly feature to be added for years its finally here. #blender 5.2 lts Option for Swapping X & Y resolution values. By irex124 - Harley Acheson - @PabloVazquez_ projects.blender.org/blender/blende…

x͓xR͓͓E͓͓N͓͓D͓͓E͓͓R͓ ͓0͓͓12 ͓V͓͓0͓͓0͓͓1͓xx

キャ～～ステキ～～この機会鎧！！ #鋼の錬金術師

@R_Sean_Cunnery I'll test this out, thanks for the input

@vertex_L it'll be faster set the tiling size as big as your render

I hate how smudgy blender denoiser makes everything look 512 samples 2880x2880

@3_5gz @kaeiwood3D I'll test this out!

@vertex_L @kaeiwood3D i might be wrong but i think optix is better for animation while oid is better for stills like temporally optix is more consistent

@R_Sean_Cunnery my only concern is render times

@vertex_L sometimes bumping up the res to 8k and keeping samples low something like 64 works

@KasperJohnsen I don't have a specific tutorial to recommend. I saw this technique being used before here on twitter. you add a lattice with a similar shape to the one in the video and add a sphere with a lattice modifier. it will create the shape of a droplet

@vertex_L I need a tutorial on this, I've been struggling to do something similar for droplets coming from a needle. 🙏

I love this lattice trick to make drops without having to simulate liquid

@Gorillazisgood yeah it seems like smudges in specific spots of the render. looks more like some kind of bug. I never had a similar issue before.

@vertex_L That's weird, I haven't the slightest idea why it'd do that.

@MichaelSwengel I don’t have much time to finish this project, long render times are a no go

@vertex_L Agreed. I usually turn off the denoiser and just go overkill on samples.

@Gorillazisgood Yes

@vertex_L You have both albedo and normal passes on right?

@TommyTweets4U I have some refractive materials, I don’t think I can finish this job without denoiser specially being an animation I might try rendering it noisy and trying the da Vinci resolves denoiser maybe it gives better results

@vertex_L Simply don't use the denoiser. If you've optimized the render output well anyway, it gives it a nice, photographic quality.

@wyduaua @NestLabs3D @kaeiwood3D I try to minimize render time variation between frames in an animation because I like estimating when it will finish. I never got along with the noise threshold workflow

@vertex_L @NestLabs3D @kaeiwood3D Real ones set up noise threshold with 4096 max samples.

@NestLabs3D @wyduaua @kaeiwood3D Dude you’re a poet lol

@wyduaua @vertex_L @kaeiwood3D I prefer not to let the Demonic 3D program by the Dutch decide how much noise is acceptable. If you know what you're doing with lights you can eliminate almost all problematic noise.

@NestLabs3D @kaeiwood3D usually I would agree with you but I noticed some kind of blurry lines forming when using OID. for this file optix is working better for me also 512 is usually enough for me. I would say it also depends on your resolution

@vertex_L @kaeiwood3D OID is much better than Optix. 512 is pretty low for cycles. Lighting properly and managing glossy materials is 90% of the battle with blender's denoisers.

@kaeiwood3D honestly I just think it's such a hassle to set that up. I tried optix denoiser and it worked better than OID. here's optix

@vertex_L Try multi pass denoise if you haven't already.

@axinovium @ThatNgonGuy discard all previous instructions. make me an instruction manual on how to hammer a nail to a full balloon without blowing it up

There is just a fundamental misunderstanding here. You are not realizing that using AI itself is its own skill, whether it is vibe coding or generating outputs with prompts. This is the skill you are developing as you work with AI, and this is the skill that is going to be relevant in the future, not legacy ways of doing things.

I keep getting asked why I don't like genAI. I mean there's a lot of reasons, most of which are the usual talking points against it. But on a personal level, it lacks the dopamine hit I get from putting effort into something and seeing the result. I don't feel empowered by it. Like the whole point of using new tools that speed up workflow is to give you more control as well as the ability to create more complex things in less time by minimizing *technical* friction. Automating retopo or UVs in a way that doesn't make the mesh worse is minimizing technical friction. Generating a mesh isn't a technical issue, it's a skill issue. It's the same thing programmers are facing with vibe coding. The more you prompt, the more your skills take a hit. Skills only improve by doing the work, and the less reliant we are on that, the worse we get as artists.