Marc Busqué ☞ @[email protected]

I'm done here. Please, follow me at @waiting_for_dev" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">ruby.social/@waiting_for_d…. I'll leave this account open in case things change in the future. The sum of our actions counts, and I don't want to support a hate-speech supporter, liar, and immature human being whose only merit is being rich.

@sebwilgosz @hanamirb @HanamiMastery yeah, it'll help those who are not robots 😁

@waiting_for_dev do you think it's even worth to continue writing about @hanamirb under @HanamiMastery if It's all so well-known 😂? #openai

🫤

@Austio36 Thanks, @Austio36 🙂 Happy someone else found interesting the origins of the name 😁 Feel free to report back with feedback about Omnes!!

Trying out a new gem for PubSub in ruby. Also learned the background for the phrase Event Bus comes from :) Thanks @waiting_for_dev #why-is-it-called-omnes" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">github.com/nebulab/omnes#…

µs... mindblowing!

@jcb Thanks for reporting, @jcb. I'll look into it

@waiting_for_dev hello. just reading your posts about JWT auth, very helpful. I noticed your blog returns a 404 when the path ends in a /, which a handful of your links from GitHub have.

What have you done for cross-posting so far?

My Mastodon account is ready. You can follow me at @waiting_for_dev@ruby.social. I'd like to see how money can't buy everything.

@sebwilgosz @solnic29a There's no difference. When you reference `not` that's substituted by the parser for a function that takes a boolean and returns another boolean. Does it make sense? 🙂

@waiting_for_dev @solnic29a oh, thanks for the explanation! It's interesting, but I'm worried, we would need to have clear distinguish between `not` and `not()` - where the latter is calling, and first just referencing? Or do you think that Parser could figure it out based on context, as you shown on image?

Functional objects have definitely become a common idiom in #ruby. One thing I'd love is to have a way to coerce an object responding to "call" to a Proc. That way, we could have polymorphism between actual procs and functional objects, and the circle would be complete 😋

@sebwilgosz @solnic29a Yeah, but I mean JUST by its name. Please, look at the picture 🙂

@waiting_for_dev @solnic29a @waiting_for_dev I feel like I don't understand - isn't `add.method(:call)' exactly that? Referencing a method without invoking it?

@solnic29a Oh, yeah, that would be even better. Like Haskell does. Also, being able to reference a method by its name without invoking it (like a partial application with 0 arguments given) 😄

@waiting_for_dev I'd even go as far as to allow partial application of methods like in rom relations 😊

@josh_cheek @WanderingMole @joeldrapper @alexandre_ruban I'm not sure it's been improved, as I haven't read anything about it. I'm afraid it still means cleaning the method cache on runtime vs. load time. See #module-including-prepending-and-extending" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">github.com/haileys/old-we…

@WanderingMole @joeldrapper @alexandre_ruban I believe it's been improved since then, since there was a pattern a while back of extending objects all over the place. It had a name, but I forgot what it was. I personally disliked it, b/c it was difficult to discover why this one instance of whatever behaved differently.

Today I learned something new about Ruby: You can extend a module directly on an instance to access the methods of the module on this specific instance (the C part in the picture 🤯)

@zverok That's so great to have it as part of Ruby ❤️

Probably, my biggest contribution to Ruby so far. (Docs and changelog aside)

My OS update for September. A busy month in the personal, but still, I found some time 😄 waiting-for-dev.github.io/blog/2022/10/0…

@SrrimbizZ @euruko Sending DM 😁

@waiting_for_dev @euruko @waiting_for_dev hey, if you still need a ticket, I have one available!

I'd love to go to my first @euruko. Please, if you have a ticket but won't be able to attend, I'll be immensely grateful if you re-assign it to me 🙏 😁 (DM me if you need details like email).

I mean, a different fallback layer per layer, defaulting to the first one like now.

@ErgoDoxEZ, it'd be even more perfect if I could define a fallback layer other than the first one 😃

For the first time, I feel entirely "bilingual" between Linux and Mac, and I can work perfectly fine on either. @ErgoDoxEZ + a few simple tricks make my flow ALMOST identical in both systems.