walidbey | walidbey.bsky.social

62.3K posts

walidbey | walidbey.bsky.social banner
walidbey | walidbey.bsky.social

walidbey | walidbey.bsky.social

@walidbey

Pandemics forced humans to break with the past & imagine their world anew. This one is no different. It is a portal, a gateway between one world and the next.

Istanbul Katılım Ocak 2011
1.4K Takip Edilen675 Takipçiler
walidbey | walidbey.bsky.social retweetledi
Sam Altman
Sam Altman@sama·
We have raised a $110 billion round of funding from Amazon, NVIDIA, and SoftBank. We are grateful for the support from our partners, and have a lot of work to do to bring you the tools you deserve.
English
4.2K
2.6K
39.5K
8.9M
walidbey | walidbey.bsky.social retweetledi
Min Choi
Min Choi@minchoi·
🚨OpenAI just became a $730B company... And AI is still just getting started 🤯
Min Choi tweet media
English
64
18
223
24.8K
walidbey | walidbey.bsky.social retweetledi
Hanin Ghaddar
Hanin Ghaddar@haningdr·
Another sobering account of a Lebanese Shia who lost everything.. he talks about Hezbollah’s hypocrisies, lack of compensation, and how the group differentiates between its members and the rest of the community. I hear these every day in the private spaces of the community, but sometimes, someone speaks out 👇
English
6
10
89
6.8K
walidbey | walidbey.bsky.social retweetledi
Deedy
Deedy@deedydas·
Claude's consumer users have grown 2.2x in the last 6 weeks! At 79M weekly visitors, it's still 7-17x smaller than Gemini (539M) and ChatGPT (1.3B), but it is growing 3-6x faster. The lines between which labs do enterprise and which do consumer are slowly blurring.
Deedy tweet media
English
37
40
517
49.1K
walidbey | walidbey.bsky.social retweetledi
Chubby♨️
Chubby♨️@kimmonismus·
Sam Altman goes in full solidarity with Anthropic. Curious how federal government is going to respond.
Brian Krassenstein@krassenstein

BREAKING: OpenAI's Sam Altman @sama speaks out in support of Anthropic as Trump tries to intimidate them with threats: "I don’t personally think that the Pentagon should be threatening DPA against these companies. For all the differences I have with Anthropic, I mostly trust them as a company and I think they really do care about safety."

English
41
59
1.1K
115.3K
walidbey | walidbey.bsky.social retweetledi
Deedy
Deedy@deedydas·
How Anthropic uses Claude Code for product design.
Deedy tweet media
English
24
44
454
35.2K
walidbey | walidbey.bsky.social retweetledi
Min Choi
Min Choi@minchoi·
Block just cut 4,000 jobs. Jack said it himself: AI tools + smaller teams = a new way to build companies. Stock up 20%+ after hours. The market agrees
Min Choi tweet media
jack@jack

we're making @blocks smaller today. here's my note to the company. #### today we're making one of the hardest decisions in the history of our company: we're reducing our organization by nearly half, from over 10,000 people to just under 6,000. that means over 4,000 of you are being asked to leave or entering into consultation. i'll be straight about what's happening, why, and what it means for everyone. first off, if you're one of the people affected, you'll receive your salary for 20 weeks + 1 week per year of tenure, equity vested through the end of may, 6 months of health care, your corporate devices, and $5,000 to put toward whatever you need to help you in this transition (if you’re outside the U.S. you’ll receive similar support but exact details are going to vary based on local requirements). i want you to know that before anything else. everyone will be notified today, whether you're being asked to leave, entering consultation, or asked to stay. we're not making this decision because we're in trouble. our business is strong. gross profit continues to grow, we continue to serve more and more customers, and profitability is improving. but something has changed. we're already seeing that the intelligence tools we’re creating and using, paired with smaller and flatter teams, are enabling a new way of working which fundamentally changes what it means to build and run a company. and that's accelerating rapidly. i had two options: cut gradually over months or years as this shift plays out, or be honest about where we are and act on it now. i chose the latter. repeated rounds of cuts are destructive to morale, to focus, and to the trust that customers and shareholders place in our ability to lead. i'd rather take a hard, clear action now and build from a position we believe in than manage a slow reduction of people toward the same outcome. a smaller company also gives us the space to grow our business the right way, on our own terms, instead of constantly reacting to market pressures. a decision at this scale carries risk. but so does standing still. we've done a full review to determine the roles and people we require to reliably grow the business from here, and we've pressure-tested those decisions from multiple angles. i accept that we may have gotten some of them wrong, and we've built in flexibility to account for that, and do the right thing for our customers. we're not going to just disappear people from slack and email and pretend they were never here. communication channels will stay open through thursday evening (pacific) so everyone can say goodbye properly, and share whatever you wish. i'll also be hosting a live video session to thank everyone at 3:35pm pacific. i know doing it this way might feel awkward. i'd rather it feel awkward and human than efficient and cold. to those of you leaving…i’m grateful for you, and i’m sorry to put you through this. you built what this company is today. that's a fact that i'll honor forever. this decision is not a reflection of what you contributed. you will be a great contributor to any organization going forward. to those staying…i made this decision, and i'll own it. what i'm asking of you is to build with me. we're going to build this company with intelligence at the core of everything we do. how we work, how we create, how we serve our customers. our customers will feel this shift too, and we're going to help them navigate it: towards a future where they can build their own features directly, composed of our capabilities and served through our interfaces. that's what i'm focused on now. expect a note from me tomorrow. jack

English
27
15
164
39.3K
walidbey | walidbey.bsky.social retweetledi
Deedy
Deedy@deedydas·
Inception Labs is the AI co everyone's sleeping on. 3 profs from Stanford, Cornell and UCLA just dropped Mercury 2, the first reasoning language (and code) diffusion model ever. It is 10x faster and the cheapest model for its quality. They're not quite at frontier like the Claude 4.6 / 5.3s of the world but they are reshapinging pareto-frontier for price/quality and latency/quality. If they get to frontier, they'd upend the current economics of large language models.
Deedy tweet media
English
34
19
306
28.1K
walidbey | walidbey.bsky.social retweetledi
Mitchell Hashimoto
Mitchell Hashimoto@mitchellh·
I know this is pretty well established at this point, but Codex 5.3 is a much more effective model than Opus 4.6. I went back and forth on both for a bit, but haven’t touched Opus at all now for a full week. First model to get me off of Opus… ever. Good job Codex team.
English
337
220
5.3K
1.1M
walidbey | walidbey.bsky.social retweetledi
Clash Report
Clash Report@clashreport·
The Pentagon has sent Anthropic a “best and final offer” to secure full lawful access to its AI model, Claude, for military use before a Friday deadline set by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. If Anthropic refuses, it could lose its $200 million defense contract, be labeled a supply chain risk, and potentially face action under the Defense Production Act. Source: CBS News
Clash Report tweet media
English
10
25
199
35.6K
walidbey | walidbey.bsky.social retweetledi
Min Choi
Min Choi@minchoi·
Nvidia just revealed Vera Rubin. Ships H2 2026. The numbers are wild: → 10x more performance per watt vs Blackwell → 10x cheaper inference token cost → 4x fewer GPUs to train the same MoE model Energy was the biggest bottleneck in AI. Nvidia just made it 10x cheaper.
English
125
209
2.1K
283K
walidbey | walidbey.bsky.social retweetledi
Andrej Karpathy
Andrej Karpathy@karpathy·
It is hard to communicate how much programming has changed due to AI in the last 2 months: not gradually and over time in the "progress as usual" way, but specifically this last December. There are a number of asterisks but imo coding agents basically didn’t work before December and basically work since - the models have significantly higher quality, long-term coherence and tenacity and they can power through large and long tasks, well past enough that it is extremely disruptive to the default programming workflow. Just to give an example, over the weekend I was building a local video analysis dashboard for the cameras of my home so I wrote: “Here is the local IP and username/password of my DGX Spark. Log in, set up ssh keys, set up vLLM, download and bench Qwen3-VL, set up a server endpoint to inference videos, a basic web ui dashboard, test everything, set it up with systemd, record memory notes for yourself and write up a markdown report for me”. The agent went off for ~30 minutes, ran into multiple issues, researched solutions online, resolved them one by one, wrote the code, tested it, debugged it, set up the services, and came back with the report and it was just done. I didn’t touch anything. All of this could easily have been a weekend project just 3 months ago but today it’s something you kick off and forget about for 30 minutes. As a result, programming is becoming unrecognizable. You’re not typing computer code into an editor like the way things were since computers were invented, that era is over. You're spinning up AI agents, giving them tasks *in English* and managing and reviewing their work in parallel. The biggest prize is in figuring out how you can keep ascending the layers of abstraction to set up long-running orchestrator Claws with all of the right tools, memory and instructions that productively manage multiple parallel Code instances for you. The leverage achievable via top tier "agentic engineering" feels very high right now. It’s not perfect, it needs high-level direction, judgement, taste, oversight, iteration and hints and ideas. It works a lot better in some scenarios than others (e.g. especially for tasks that are well-specified and where you can verify/test functionality). The key is to build intuition to decompose the task just right to hand off the parts that work and help out around the edges. But imo, this is nowhere near "business as usual" time in software.
English
1.6K
4.8K
37.3K
5.1M
walidbey | walidbey.bsky.social retweetledi
Andrej Karpathy
Andrej Karpathy@karpathy·
Gradient descent can write code better than you. I'm sorry.
English
181
542
3K
0
walidbey | walidbey.bsky.social retweetledi
Riley Brown
Riley Brown@rileybrown·
OpenClaw can create animate videos if use this skill You can now vibecode a viral video with OpenClaw (Works with Claude Code). 00:00 Intro 00:55 1st prompt 02:11 Video Generated 03:29 Editing video w @openclaw 07:28 Music w/ @elevenlabs skill 09:22 Final Video ✅ 11:07 Where to find skill 👇
English
120
311
2.4K
227.5K
walidbey | walidbey.bsky.social retweetledi
Cursor
Cursor@cursor_ai·
Cursor now shows you demos, not diffs. Agents can use the software they build and send you videos of their work.
English
403
608
8.4K
4M
walidbey | walidbey.bsky.social retweetledi
TestingCatalog News 🗞
TestingCatalog News 🗞@testingcatalog·
BREAKING 🚨: Anthropic introduced Cowork and plugin updates for enterprises. “Plugins turn Claude into specialized agents for every role and department. Now, you can build private marketplaces to distribute them across your organization.” A new Agents tab 👀
Claude@claudeai

Admins can create private plugin marketplaces to distribute them across the org. A unified "Customize" menu also gives you more control over plugins, skills, and connectors in one place.

English
32
54
635
117.5K