Wardley Maps

6.5K posts

Wardley Maps banner
Wardley Maps

Wardley Maps

@wardleymaps

I help people achieve success in three steps: (1) Be consistently right (2) Build alliances (3) Make impact Operated by @kda

where you need me most Katılım Mayıs 2014
583 Takip Edilen2.4K Takipçiler
Wardley Maps
Wardley Maps@wardleymaps·
btw. closing open decision loops is most liberating feeling ever. More at @kda
English
1
1
2
121
Wardley Maps
Wardley Maps@wardleymaps·
Yeah, I did that. I also shut down all of the free mapping teaching. This stuff was increadibly draining as I was hoping it will become sustainable for far too long. At least, I have got some clarity and free cycles to think about other things.
English
1
0
2
75
Wardley Maps
Wardley Maps@wardleymaps·
I am on the verge of rejecting my next mapping talk. Teaching mapping is fun, but bills need to be paid.
English
1
0
4
189
Wardley Maps
Wardley Maps@wardleymaps·
@joa_pen @swardley @u3m Fair point, but you are also a seasoned mapper who had plenty of time to make up his mind. Newcomers see @swardley's statement sooner or later.
English
0
0
0
12
Joaquín Peña Fernández
@wardleymaps @swardley @u3m I get your point, but in my simple way of thinking this is a tool, an excellent tool for certain problems, works for me in certain problem? I use it, doesn't it fit well? I look for other tool. I do not have a moral imperative that brought me to use a screwdriver 🤣🤣🤣
English
1
0
0
22
Wardley Maps
Wardley Maps@wardleymaps·
the official mapping purpose "to get rid off consultants" does not sit with me. Here, I said it.
English
1
0
1
187
Wardley Maps
Wardley Maps@wardleymaps·
@joa_pen @swardley @u3m ...means there is no imperative to learn maps in a number of situations, like you being a consultant, or you collaborating with good consultants. which is hard to accept, because consultants are using maping to do some good :).
English
1
0
0
21
Wardley Maps
Wardley Maps@wardleymaps·
@joa_pen @swardley @u3m Your statement is fine :). I am saying something slightly different - current imperative wording says that mapping is for you if you feel enslaved by consultants. With Simon's additional explanation, there is no need to rebel if you do not feel enslaved. Which also...
English
1
0
0
22
Wardley Maps
Wardley Maps@wardleymaps·
@swardley @u3m I need confirmation if my understanding is correct. are you saying that mapping has no imperative for people who do not feel enslaved by consultants (f.e. see value in consultant's work or are consultants themselves) ?
English
1
0
1
35
Simon Wardley
Simon Wardley@swardley·
@u3m @wardleymaps Specifically, it's "rebel against consultants that enslave us" ... if they don't enslave, then there is no need to rebel.
Simon Wardley tweet media
English
1
0
1
51
Wardley Maps
Wardley Maps@wardleymaps·
@swardley which is a big hypothesis of course - as there could have been many more such things.
English
0
0
0
24
Wardley Maps
Wardley Maps@wardleymaps·
@swardley Nomadic cultures relied less on labour - their property customs were very different. Yet, the're a minority right now. Which means that somehow property-based approach was better suited for (at least short-term) evolutionary success.
English
1
0
0
28
Simon Wardley
Simon Wardley@swardley·
The entire economic system is built on a shared value of exclusion. This value enables property and hence trade i.e. it is your property, not my property. I marvel at the magical thinking that a system built on exclusion will magically eliminate exclusion. I would suggest people go watch Elysium (a film full of robots) in order to find out what a more realistic future is likely to be.
Dustin@r0ck3t23

Every economic system in human history was built on one assumption. Physical output is finite. Elon Musk is building the thing that makes that assumption wrong. Musk: “The Optimus numbers are so mind-blowing that you’re like, is this real? That’s why I wonder, what does money even mean at that point?” That is not a boast. That is a man who can already see what’s on the other side and has no language for it yet. Scarcity has been the operating system of civilization since the beginning. Every war ever fought, every empire ever built, every economic system ever designed. All of it was just a different strategy for managing limited physical output. Optimus is the first technology in history designed to make scarcity extinct. Musk: “I actually think the market for humanoid robots is in excess of 10 billion units, more than the number of humans.” Ten billion tireless workers. No fatigue. No failure. No human potential burned on work that was never meant for human hands. Every dangerous job that has ever killed a person. Every repetitive task that has ever consumed a life. Every physical burden that has ever stood between someone and the only work that actually requires being human. Optimus absorbs all of it. Musk: “If they do sell for 20,000 dollars, that’s 200 trillion dollars. This is just an insane number.” Two hundred trillion dollars is not a valuation. It is what civilization was leaving on the table every single year it ran on human muscle instead of something better. Poverty is not solved by redistributing wealth. It is solved by making the things that create wealth limitless. That is what this actually is. Not a robot. The last time scarcity gets to decide what humans are capable of.

English
2
5
27
3.1K
Wardley Maps
Wardley Maps@wardleymaps·
@swardley Elysium is a likely outcome, though. Possibly terrible outcome for humanity... but individuals will not see it as such, due to some things being seen as 'impossible'. And Matt Damon will not save us.
English
0
0
0
26
Wardley Maps
Wardley Maps@wardleymaps·
@swardley ... are basically the foundation on which a lot of other things have been built. Even CC-BY-SA is a continuation of the 'right to harvest' :D.
English
1
0
0
10
Wardley Maps
Wardley Maps@wardleymaps·
@AngelicaOung The situation has been fixed later by a change in the approach - the Parliament started each session from the agreement that majority shall be enough.
English
0
0
1
35
Wardley Maps
Wardley Maps@wardleymaps·
@AngelicaOung Liberum veto was rarely used because the practice was to find a working solution. The first use of it is actually one where Russia bribed one of the representatives to claim it and run away, blocking proceedings and making it impossible to find a consensus.
English
1
0
1
226
Angelica 🌐⚛️🇹🇼🇨🇳🇺🇸
I’ve been thinking about the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth lately. It’s really a delightfully idiosyncratic proto-democracy. The nobles of Poland and Lithuania decided to strip the monarchy of its hereditary nature and treat the king almost like a CEO position. After the old dynasty died out they literally talent-searched across Europe for a suitable foreign prince and then treated him more like an employee, complete with a kind of job contract. He couldn’t pass laws without parliament (the Sejm). The whole system was designed to stop the king from turning into a tyrant, especially at a time when most of Europe was absolute monarchy. And for a long time it actually worked. Part of the reason is that politics in the Commonwealth ran on consensus. The sejm had a culture of working together to reach unanimity. That’s where the infamous Liberum veto comes from. Any one noble could veto legislation. On paper that sounds insane, but it mostly worked because ppl almost never used it. The problem came once politics became more factional, the veto turned into the perfect sabotage tool. Foreign powers could simply bribe a single deputy to bring the Sejm to a grinding halt. Catherine the great got very good at this. She also got one of her lovers in as the last king so definitely some foreign interference heh. Aaaaand then she just partitioned it and poor Poland wasn’t a country for a looooong time after that. What makes the story interesting is that the rules themselves didn’t suddenly change. What changed was the political culture around them. The system was built on the assumption that elites would act with a certain level of restraint and shared responsibility. Once that assumption stopped being true, the safeguards became attack surfaces. I sometimes wonder if something similar is happening in the United States. The founders designed the American system with checks and balances to prevent executive overreach. But it was actually dependent heavily on norms that are not written down and are hard to put back after they erode for whatever reason.
Angelica 🌐⚛️🇹🇼🇨🇳🇺🇸 tweet mediaAngelica 🌐⚛️🇹🇼🇨🇳🇺🇸 tweet media
English
165
278
1.9K
241.6K
Wardley Maps retweetledi
Dr. Dominic Ng
Dr. Dominic Ng@DrDominicNg·
i regret to inform you that personal growth rarely comes from acquiring new knowledge and almost always from: - getting humiliated - showing up terrified and doing it anyway - admitting you might be the problem
English
286
12K
83.5K
1.2M
Wardley Maps
Wardley Maps@wardleymaps·
A good component on a map represents an 'affordance'. This is a concept known from design - and it means it invites some sort of action.
English
0
1
1
91
Tomasz Onyszko
Tomasz Onyszko@tonyszko·
@PernotLeplay Poland isn’t on this list but we have our replacement and it is widely used. You can pay on-line, in store and do direct transfers with it. It is called BLIK and is tested right now outside of Poland 🖖
English
4
1
62
10.5K