WebDevCody

9.1K posts

WebDevCody banner
WebDevCody

WebDevCody

@webdevcody

✝️ “love thy neighbor” 🤖 https://t.co/KTxsaun1ky

United States Katılım Ocak 2023
881 Takip Edilen26.2K Takipçiler
WebDevCody
WebDevCody@webdevcody·
@nick_woodward_ @dreamsofcode_io no, I'm not. show me code that handles all potential status code errors from a third party service vs one that doesn't. guess what, the robust code that handles all failure scenarios and properly retries, logs, rollback transactions will have more lines of code
English
1
0
1
51
WebDevCody
WebDevCody@webdevcody·
Why is there so much anti-LoC rhetoric? At some point, more features, edge cases, security, and reliability require more code. There’s no magic abstraction that lets you build an operating system in 500 lines. Unless you’re building a todo app, you’ll need lots of code.
English
52
1
86
12.8K
theognis
theognis@theognisSC2·
@webdevcody curious, why do you use /loop and not /goal?
English
1
0
0
177
WebDevCody
WebDevCody@webdevcody·
the biggest issue I have with using ai are the gaps and drift they leave when you make changes. a simple "/loop remove as much dead code from my project until you get it all" will show you that all the previous prompts you made with AI left a bunch of stuff.
English
13
3
76
4.8K
WebDevCody
WebDevCody@webdevcody·
@kevin_moechel Static analysis finds predefined patterns. AI can reason about intent and context. Will fallow audit find abandoned Terraform resources, overly broad IAM policies, obsolete feature flags, or code that still runs but no longer serves a purpose? They’re complementary tools.
English
0
0
1
133
Kevin Möchel
Kevin Möchel@kevin_moechel·
@webdevcody pnpm dlx fallow audit Why trust non-determinism to find something that's perfectly fine too evaluate with static analysis? And all the tokens wasted..
English
1
0
1
193
WebDevCody
WebDevCody@webdevcody·
@ahmed_eumar the P0-P1 I wouldn't ignore, especially if using frontier model to do the security audit
English
1
0
2
216
Ahmed Omar
Ahmed Omar@ahmed_eumar·
@webdevcody Most of my experience with this is one or two geniune issues and the rest are non-issues, false positives ,etc... Is this yor experience as well?
English
1
1
1
211
WebDevCody
WebDevCody@webdevcody·
"/loop continue to explore my codebase using sub agents for security issues and create a github issue for each one with the proper P0-P4 label"
English
2
1
69
5.6K
Alon Shrestha
Alon Shrestha@alonshrestha·
@webdevcody so? you mean code volume equal success. i'm more worried if you used ai to build this content.
English
1
0
0
295
WebDevCody
WebDevCody@webdevcody·
just remember, some kid in college with multiple Claude Code subscriptions using Fable 5 is producing more code in the past few weeks than you ever have in your entire 10+ software career.
English
122
11
400
49.8K
WebDevCody
WebDevCody@webdevcody·
@thingsdev14 yes, the model looks into something new to investigate each prompt from what I'm seeing
English
1
0
0
65
WebDevCody
WebDevCody@webdevcody·
the key to agentic coding
WebDevCody tweet media
English
7
0
26
2.2K
WebDevCody
WebDevCody@webdevcody·
"Hey, so welcome to the interview! before we start I just want to make sure you're ok that we use Gemini to record our conversation so that we can feed it to an LLM to determine if you're a good culture fit or not. Ok? First question, What’s your biggest weakness?"
English
20
3
142
14.8K
WebDevCody
WebDevCody@webdevcody·
These models ALWAYS stop short with every single prompt I have ever done. Even with well thought out workflow that guide the AI in phases, it will skip stuff and not get it all. The only way to use AI is to re-prompt it over and over again to check it's work.
English
0
1
5
597
Matt Pocock
Matt Pocock@mattpocockuk·
1. Delete the docs you create to explain your code 2. Take the tokens you save on updating those docs 3. Spend them on making your code self-explanatory
English
156
138
2.7K
312.8K
WebDevCody
WebDevCody@webdevcody·
@grantjordan nothing better than a human intentionally causing more work for the entire team because of "dogma"
English
1
0
2
670
Grant Jordan
Grant Jordan@grantjordan·
I like this take. Forked a repo recently to add a needed feature. CI failed because LoC was above 1250. But most of it was tests and documentation. Feature was solid but the maintainer refused unless I split it into multiple PRs simple because of an arbitrary LoC requirement. Totally arbitrary requirement based on human coding norms, not ai norms of today.
English
3
0
4
749
Theo - t3.gg
Theo - t3.gg@theo·
@ceo_on_bus "slop" accounts? My employees are quality shitposters thank you very much Separately, it's a requirement that all of my employees make fun of me regularly. My haters suck at it so someone's gotta do it right.
English
17
2
624
18.7K
Sarvesh (CEO_on_Bus)
Sarvesh (CEO_on_Bus)@ceo_on_bus·
does @theo has multiple slop accounts ? i won't dare to speak against my boss
Sarvesh (CEO_on_Bus) tweet mediaSarvesh (CEO_on_Bus) tweet media
English
5
0
41
21.6K
godilov
godilov@gnodilov·
@webdevcody It doesn't mean maximizing LOC for the sake of maximizing is the right thing. We are told now 100k+ LOC todo app is fine
English
1
0
6
672
me, B.S.
me, B.S.@normal_brandon1·
@webdevcody Like judging an artist by the number of art pieces they have.
English
3
0
12
776