
Fake
ᗯEᗷᔕᑎᗩᑕKEᖇ’ᔕ ᗩᑌTOᗰᗩT ᖴOᖇ TᕼE ᗯEᗷ ᗯᗩᑎᗪEᖇEᖇ ™ 🚀
17.6K posts

@websnacker
Unpacking global politics, media bias & cultural chaos. World Citizen. Wordsmith. Cineaste. Musicophile. Voyager. Founder @CineBloggers @AudioBloggers

Fake


Fake


Fake

Politico EU: Moscow proposed a quid pro quo to the U.S. under which the Kremlin would stop sharing intelligence information with Iran, such as the precise coordinates of U.S. military assets in the Middle East, if Washington ceased supplying Ukraine with intel about Russia. Two people familiar with the U.S.-Russia negotiations said that such a proposal was made by Russian envoy Kirill Dmitriev to Trump administration envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner during their meeting last week in Miami.


Moscow proposed a quid pro quo to the US under which the Kremlin would stop sharing intelligence information with Iran - such as the precise coordinates of US military assets in the Middle East - if the US ceased supplying Ukraine with intel about Russia. politico.eu/article/putin-…


Who Owns the Ganga? A River of Many Faiths, Not One. thewire.in/culture/who-ow…





@LauraLoomer @DalaiLama I think visiting India has been the best thing you’ve ever done - this break has done you so much good ❤️











I wouldn’t bet on Russia doing anything decisive now. I have lost that hope. Moscow has consistently hedged; from delaying S-300s to allowing Israeli strikes in Syria. Putin himself admitted Israel is “almost a Russian-speaking country” with ~2M ex-Soviets he must consider. An open admission that Russian speaking Israelis shape Kremlin decisions. That’s not an ally ready to go all-in. Iran, meanwhile, has shown how a sanctioned state can still impose real costs on stronger adversaries. Contrast that with Russia; a far bigger power fighting Ukraine cautiously while its generals get picked off and even an alleged attempt on Putin goes unanswered. China is the real variable. Beijing understands the sequence: if Iran falls, pressure shifts; maybe Cuba, then eventually Russia and China. The question isn’t about ideology; it’s timing. China won’t move for sentiment only when the cost of not acting exceeds the risk of acting. The only question is whether it steps in before or after the line reaches its doorstep.
